个人环境致害行为法律规制研究
发布时间：2018-07-18 08:50
【摘要】：随着社会经济的发展,环境污染主体已经从公司、企业逐步转为个人。个人环境致害行为在国内外没有完整的法律体系进行规制。其一般是依据客观实际制定单行法规或者采用诉讼的机制去处理具体个人环境致害行为的问题。本文旨在明确个人环境致害行为的概念,并且结合我国环境保护法、侵权责任法相关法律法规和实践情况,分析规制个人环境致害行为的必要性和可行性,同时在借鉴德国、美国关于个人环境致害行为规制经验的基础上,为构建我国个人环境致害行为法律规范提供参考意见。本文正文由四章构成:第一章对个人环境致害行为的概念和分类进行分析,并且对个人环境致害行为规制的法律和经济学基础进行分析,得出进行规制的必要性以及规制的注意要素;第二章从个人环境致害行为立法透析和现状检视两个方面分析,通过对我国关于个人环境致害行为的理论研究进行分析以及对现有法律法规存在不足的分析,在对我国关于该问题现状关注的基础上,得出关于该问题理论上是具有正当性的,是符合时代发展潮流的结论。第三章对个人环境致害行为进行域外考察,结合德国、美国关于该问题的立法规制,总结经验,作为我国对该问题规制的参考。第四章从个人环境致害行为立法规定的建立、相关法律保障制度与思想观念修正、引进域外经验改善目前现状三个方面分析了我国个人环境致害行为法律规制的构想。从三个层面分别提出对个人环境致害行为进行规制的意见,具有参考价值。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, the main body of environmental pollution has changed from company and enterprise to individual. There is no complete legal system to regulate the behavior of personal environmental harm at home and abroad. It is generally based on the objective reality to formulate separate laws or to use the mechanism of litigation to deal with specific personal environmental harm behavior. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the concept of personal environmental harm behavior, and to analyze the necessity and feasibility of regulating individual environmental harm behavior by combining the relevant laws and regulations of our country's environmental protection law, tort liability law and practice, and at the same time using Germany for reference. On the basis of the experience of the regulation of personal environmental harm in the United States, this paper provides some suggestions for the construction of the legal norms of personal environmental harm in our country. The text is composed of four chapters: the first chapter analyzes the concept and classification of personal environmental harm behavior, and analyzes the legal and economic basis of the regulation of personal environmental harm behavior. The necessity of regulation and the essential factors of regulation are obtained. The second chapter analyzes the legislation of personal environmental harm from two aspects: legislation analysis and current situation inspection. Through the analysis of the theory of personal environmental harm behavior in our country and the deficiency analysis of the existing laws and regulations, on the basis of paying close attention to the current situation of the problem in our country, we can draw a conclusion that the theory of this problem is legitimate. Is in line with the trend of development of the times. The third chapter carries on the outside investigation to the personal environmental harm behavior, unifies the Germany, the United States about this question the legislation regulation, summarizes the experience, serves as our country to this question regulation reference. The fourth chapter analyzes the conception of the legal regulation of personal environmental harm behavior in China from the following three aspects: the establishment of the legislative provisions of personal environmental harm, the revision of the relevant legal protection system and the ideological concept, and the introduction of extraterritorial experience to improve the present situation. It has reference value to put forward the suggestion of regulating personal environmental harm behavior from three aspects.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.68
本文编号：2131387
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, the main body of environmental pollution has changed from company and enterprise to individual. There is no complete legal system to regulate the behavior of personal environmental harm at home and abroad. It is generally based on the objective reality to formulate separate laws or to use the mechanism of litigation to deal with specific personal environmental harm behavior. The purpose of this paper is to clarify the concept of personal environmental harm behavior, and to analyze the necessity and feasibility of regulating individual environmental harm behavior by combining the relevant laws and regulations of our country's environmental protection law, tort liability law and practice, and at the same time using Germany for reference. On the basis of the experience of the regulation of personal environmental harm in the United States, this paper provides some suggestions for the construction of the legal norms of personal environmental harm in our country. The text is composed of four chapters: the first chapter analyzes the concept and classification of personal environmental harm behavior, and analyzes the legal and economic basis of the regulation of personal environmental harm behavior. The necessity of regulation and the essential factors of regulation are obtained. The second chapter analyzes the legislation of personal environmental harm from two aspects: legislation analysis and current situation inspection. Through the analysis of the theory of personal environmental harm behavior in our country and the deficiency analysis of the existing laws and regulations, on the basis of paying close attention to the current situation of the problem in our country, we can draw a conclusion that the theory of this problem is legitimate. Is in line with the trend of development of the times. The third chapter carries on the outside investigation to the personal environmental harm behavior, unifies the Germany, the United States about this question the legislation regulation, summarizes the experience, serves as our country to this question regulation reference. The fourth chapter analyzes the conception of the legal regulation of personal environmental harm behavior in China from the following three aspects: the establishment of the legislative provisions of personal environmental harm, the revision of the relevant legal protection system and the ideological concept, and the introduction of extraterritorial experience to improve the present situation. It has reference value to put forward the suggestion of regulating personal environmental harm behavior from three aspects.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.68
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 吴卫星;;我国环境权理论研究三十年之回顾、反思与前瞻[J];法学评论;2014年05期
2 王曦;谢海波;;论环境权法定化在美国的冷遇及其原因[J];上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年04期
3 陈海嵩;;国家环境保护义务的溯源与展开[J];法学研究;2014年03期
4 陶伦康;;公民个人环境行为监管法律制度创新研究——以低碳经济为视角[J];现代法学;2011年03期
5 刘超;;权利冲突视野中的环境侵权救济路径选择——一个类型化的分析视角[J];广西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2010年01期
6 吕忠梅;;环境侵权的遗传与变异——论环境侵害的制度演进[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2010年01期
7 陈贻健;;生态马克思主义的异化消费观与环境法的反思[J];行政与法;2009年12期
8 胡元聪;;论消费领域外部性的经济法解决——基于公民环境权法制保障[J];现代经济探讨;2009年09期
9 王艳;;试析我国病态消费行为的形式、实质和危害——兼论科学消费模式的构建[J];湖北经济学院学报(人文社会科学版);2009年08期
10 乔瑜;;美国社会的个人主义与环境保护观念的关系[J];首都师范大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
，本文编号：2131387
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2131387.html
