交通运输行政立法评估研究
发布时间：2018-08-08 16:43
【摘要】：改革开放以来,我国交通运输立法工作成果明显,基本上解决了无法可依的问题,为实现依法行政奠定了较为坚实的基础。大部制改革后,交通运输行业管理领域和执法门类都有所拓展,对交通运输主管部门提出了更高的要求和责任。因此,如何在降低立法成本的基础上,既加强立法项目实施效果监督,又改进立法问题是摆在交通运输行业亟待解决的课题。国际社会立法评估的经验告诉我们,通过统一规范的评估制度对已施行的立法项目进行评估,是提高立法质量的有效途径。交通运输部《关于开展交通立法后评估工作的指导意见》(交体法发(2009)33号)印发以来,行业内相继开展了一些有益探索,并收获了许多宝贵经验。然而,交通运输行业研究立法评估还不够深入,立法评估体制建设还不够统一规范,监督保障立法评估实施的措施相对缺乏等原因,导致部分单位和机构对开展立法评估不积极、不重视、不认可。 本文在简述交通运输立法评估理论、归纳交通运输立法评估现状、总结评估问题、分析国内和国外立法评估实例基础上,重点探索构建适合交通运输行业的立法评估制度。引言主要是对选取《交通运输行政立法评估研究》这个题目的原因进行简要说明,简述交通运输部对于开展立法评估的认识程度,以及行业内开展立法评估的现状。正文共四部分,具体框架如下：一是介绍交通运输立法评估制度的相关理论。从对交通运输行政立法评估概念的理解,到对一般特征和行业特征的归纳,再到对立法评估意义的分析；二是归纳国内交通运输行业开展立法评估工作的情况,并总结评估工作中存在的问题,为进一步规范、改进交通运输立法评估提供实证参考；三是通过对国内外立法评估实例的介绍和分析,总结他们的成果和不足,为尚处于起步阶段的交通运输行政立法评估提供学习和借鉴的依据；四是尝试构建适合交通运输行业的立法评估体制,体制建设涉及交通运输立法评估的主体、对象、标准、方法、程序等方面,努力通过建立完备、系统、科学的立法评估体制,规范交通运输行业立法评估工作的实施和管理,推进交通运输行业在立法评估工作的制度化和法制化进程。
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, our country traffic transportation legislation work achievement is obvious, basically has solved the question which cannot depend on, has laid a more solid foundation for realizing the administration by law. After the reform of the Ministry of Transport, the management field and the law enforcement category of the transportation industry have been expanded, and higher requirements and responsibilities have been put forward to the traffic and transportation departments. Therefore, on the basis of reducing the cost of legislation, it is an urgent task to strengthen the supervision of the effect of the implementation of the legislative project and to improve the legislation in the transportation industry. The experience of legislation evaluation in international society tells us that it is an effective way to improve the quality of legislation to evaluate the legislative items implemented through the unified and standardized evaluation system. Since the publication of the Ministry of Transport's guidance on the Post-Legislative Evaluation of Traffic (2009) 33, some beneficial explorations have been carried out in the industry, and many valuable experiences have been gained. However, the research on the legislative evaluation of the transportation industry is not deep enough, the construction of the legislative evaluation system is not uniform and standardized, and the measures to monitor and guarantee the implementation of the legislative evaluation are relatively lacking. As a result, some units and institutions to carry out legislative evaluation is not active, do not attach importance to, do not recognize. On the basis of summarizing the theory of legislative evaluation of traffic and transportation, summarizing the present situation of legislative evaluation of traffic and transportation, summing up the evaluation problems and analyzing the domestic and foreign cases of legislative evaluation, this paper focuses on the construction of a legislative evaluation system suitable for the traffic and transportation industry. The preface is mainly to briefly explain the reasons for selecting the topic of "Research on the Evaluation of Traffic and Transportation Administration and legislation", and briefly introduce the understanding degree of the Ministry of Transport to carry out the legislative evaluation and the present situation of carrying out the legislative evaluation in the industry. The main body has four parts, the specific frame is as follows: first, introduces the traffic transportation legislation appraisal system correlation theory. From the understanding of the concept of administrative and legislative evaluation of traffic and transportation, to the induction of general characteristics and industry characteristics, and to the analysis of the significance of legislative evaluation, the second is to sum up the situation of the domestic transportation industry in carrying out the legislative evaluation work. And summarizes the problems in the evaluation work, for further standardization, improve the traffic and transport legislation evaluation to provide empirical reference; third, through the introduction and analysis of domestic and foreign legislative evaluation examples, summed up their achievements and shortcomings, The fourth is to try to build a legislative evaluation system suitable for the transportation industry, which involves the subject, object and standard of the legislative evaluation of traffic and transportation. Methods, procedures, and other aspects, through the establishment of a complete, systematic and scientific legislative evaluation system to standardize the implementation and management of the legislative evaluation of the transportation industry, To promote the institutionalization and legalization of the legislative evaluation of the transportation industry.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1
本文编号：2172396
[Abstract]:Since the reform and opening up, our country traffic transportation legislation work achievement is obvious, basically has solved the question which cannot depend on, has laid a more solid foundation for realizing the administration by law. After the reform of the Ministry of Transport, the management field and the law enforcement category of the transportation industry have been expanded, and higher requirements and responsibilities have been put forward to the traffic and transportation departments. Therefore, on the basis of reducing the cost of legislation, it is an urgent task to strengthen the supervision of the effect of the implementation of the legislative project and to improve the legislation in the transportation industry. The experience of legislation evaluation in international society tells us that it is an effective way to improve the quality of legislation to evaluate the legislative items implemented through the unified and standardized evaluation system. Since the publication of the Ministry of Transport's guidance on the Post-Legislative Evaluation of Traffic (2009) 33, some beneficial explorations have been carried out in the industry, and many valuable experiences have been gained. However, the research on the legislative evaluation of the transportation industry is not deep enough, the construction of the legislative evaluation system is not uniform and standardized, and the measures to monitor and guarantee the implementation of the legislative evaluation are relatively lacking. As a result, some units and institutions to carry out legislative evaluation is not active, do not attach importance to, do not recognize. On the basis of summarizing the theory of legislative evaluation of traffic and transportation, summarizing the present situation of legislative evaluation of traffic and transportation, summing up the evaluation problems and analyzing the domestic and foreign cases of legislative evaluation, this paper focuses on the construction of a legislative evaluation system suitable for the traffic and transportation industry. The preface is mainly to briefly explain the reasons for selecting the topic of "Research on the Evaluation of Traffic and Transportation Administration and legislation", and briefly introduce the understanding degree of the Ministry of Transport to carry out the legislative evaluation and the present situation of carrying out the legislative evaluation in the industry. The main body has four parts, the specific frame is as follows: first, introduces the traffic transportation legislation appraisal system correlation theory. From the understanding of the concept of administrative and legislative evaluation of traffic and transportation, to the induction of general characteristics and industry characteristics, and to the analysis of the significance of legislative evaluation, the second is to sum up the situation of the domestic transportation industry in carrying out the legislative evaluation work. And summarizes the problems in the evaluation work, for further standardization, improve the traffic and transport legislation evaluation to provide empirical reference; third, through the introduction and analysis of domestic and foreign legislative evaluation examples, summed up their achievements and shortcomings, The fourth is to try to build a legislative evaluation system suitable for the transportation industry, which involves the subject, object and standard of the legislative evaluation of traffic and transportation. Methods, procedures, and other aspects, through the establishment of a complete, systematic and scientific legislative evaluation system to standardize the implementation and management of the legislative evaluation of the transportation industry, To promote the institutionalization and legalization of the legislative evaluation of the transportation industry.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 杨建顺;;论行政评价机制与参与型行政[J];北方法学;2007年01期
2 淳于淼泠,赵泽洪,贺芒;日本新一轮行政改革理念及现状[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2002年03期
3 郑文金;;立法后评估探讨——全国人大常委会立法后评估研讨会观点综述[J];楚天主人;2008年09期
4 任中平;朱开君;;敢于怀疑权威 善于发现问题 勇于探索创新——谈谈马克思主义哲学教学中创造性思维能力的培养[J];西华师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年04期
5 崔卓兰;杜一平;;我国行政规章的事后评估机制研究——规章制定权扩张与监督权萎缩的非对称性分析及其解决[J];法学评论;2011年05期
6 汪全胜;;立法后评估的“利益相关者”模式[J];法治研究;2010年01期
7 任则禹;;立法后评估的主体及其他[J];公民导刊;2010年06期
8 奚长兴;对法国公共政策评估的初步探讨[J];国家行政学院学报;2005年06期
9 龙晓林;;美国行政立法后评估概况[J];探求;2008年01期
10 俞荣根;;立法后评估:法律体系形成后的一项重要工作[J];西南政法大学学报;2011年01期
，本文编号：2172396
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/xingzhengfalunwen/2172396.html
