免职衍生为问责手段的误区及化解

发布时间：2018-10-23 15:18

【摘要】：从法律上来看,免职是一种正常的人事任免手段,不具备惩戒性;问责则要求官员对其行为作出解释以及回应,并对违反公共职责的官员实施一定的惩罚,具有一定的惩戒性。"官本位"的政治文化影响、我国现有的问责法律制度中对官员"免职"的责任定位不明确、官员问责制度本身的不完善是免职被衍生为问责手段的主要成因。以30个案例分析指出,免职被衍生为行政问责手段将产生执法过程随意性大、"免职"官员的复出成为常态、免职被异化为庇护官员(尤其是高官)的保护伞等一系列问题。应纠正目前法律中对免职的各种模糊规定,明确免职的人事管理性质,取消"免职"作为问责官员的惩罚形式,统一规范我国官员问责的形式、内容及程序,从制度上建立起切实有效的官员问责机制。
[Abstract]:From the legal point of view, dismissal is a normal means of appointment and removal of personnel without disciplinary nature; accountability requires officials to explain and respond to their actions and to impose certain penalties on officials who violate their public duties, with a certain degree of disciplinary nature. ". Under the influence of the political culture of officialdom standard, the position of "removal from office" in the present legal system of accountability of our country is not clear, and the imperfection of the system of official accountability itself is the main reason why the removal of duty is derived as a means of accountability. With 30 case studies, it is pointed out that a series of problems will arise from the derivation of dismissal as a means of administrative accountability, such as the arbitrariness of the law enforcement process, the return of "deposed" officials to normal, and the alienation of dismissal into the protective umbrella of sheltered officials (especially senior officials), and so on. It is necessary to correct the various vague provisions of the current law on removal from office, to clarify the nature of personnel management of the dismissal, to abolish "removal" as a form of punishment for accountable officials, and to unify and standardize the forms, contents and procedures of the accountability of officials in our country. From the system to establish an effective and effective accountability mechanism for officials.
【作者单位】：中南大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学青年基金“公共服务提供的社会问责机制研究:影响因素与应用模式”(71303262) 国家留学基金委资助项目“中国官员问责制研究”(201306375014) “十二五”湖南省重点学科资助项目(湘教发[2011]76号)
【分类号】：D922.11

【参考文献】