昆明市集中行政复议权实践研究

发布时间：2019-02-27 07:04

【摘要】：在加快建设法治政府、创新社会治理的形势下,国务院高度重视改革行政复议体制,在实践中以集中行政复议审理权为重点,以建立行政复议委员会为突破口推进行政复议体制改革。从实践的地区看,在健全行政复议机构,配齐行政复议人员,建立经费装备保障机制,提高行政复议公信力等方面取得了很大的效果。集中行政复议审理权,建立行政复议委员会已逐渐成为我国改革行政复议体制的主导方向。从昆明市改革行政复议体制看,2012年才在辖属五个县(市)、区探索实践集中行政复议权,此项实践已落后于国内其他城市。但由于实践的县(市)区行政复议案件少或没有行政复议案件,集中行政复议权没有实践的基础条件,加之未触及机构、人员、经费保障机制等改革,效果并不理想。从现实情况看,昆明市行政复议存在审理模式单一、职能分散、机构缺乏中立性、人员职业化、专业化程度不高等问题。行政复议案件呈现疑难、复杂、群体性的倾向,案件类型多样,审理难度加大,行政复议审理机制改革的滞后与行政复议现实问题的双重叠加,导致行政复议审理机制不适应社会矛盾的化解,与社会公众的行政复议需求形成巨大反差,大量本应通过法律途径解决的行政纠纷脱离法律途径之外,行政复议久拖不决,上访、闹访、缠访现象突出。本文通过研究国外集中行政复议制度和省外集中行政复议审理权的实践,结合昆明市行政复议存在的问题和集中行政复议权的优势,提出集中行政复议权实践对策建议,以期为昆明市集中行政复议权实践贡献一丝绵薄之力。
[Abstract]:Under the situation of speeding up the construction of a government ruled by law and innovating social governance, the State Council attaches great importance to reforming the administrative reconsideration system, focusing on centralizing the power of administrative reconsideration in practice. To establish an administrative review committee as a breakthrough to promote the reform of the administrative review system. From the point of view of practice, great effect has been achieved in perfecting administrative reconsideration institutions, matching administrative reconsideration personnel, establishing funding and equipment support mechanism, and improving the credibility of administrative reconsideration. Centralizing the power of administrative reconsideration and establishing the administrative reconsideration committee have gradually become the leading direction of the reform of the administrative reconsideration system in our country. From the perspective of the reform of administrative reconsideration system in Kunming, it is only in 2012 that five counties (cities) are under its jurisdiction. The practice of district exploration and centralization of administrative review power has lagged behind other cities in China. However, because there are few administrative reconsideration cases or no administrative reconsideration cases in the county (city) district in practice, the centralized administrative review power has no basic conditions of practice, and it has not touched on the reform of institutions, personnel, funds guarantee mechanism, etc., and the effect is not satisfactory. In reality, there are some problems in the administrative reconsideration of Kunming, such as single trial mode, decentralized functions, lack of neutrality of institutions, professionalism of personnel, and low degree of specialization, etc. The administrative reconsideration cases are difficult, complex, group-oriented, diverse in types, more difficult to hear, the lag in the reform of the administrative reconsideration hearing mechanism and the double superposition of the practical problems in administrative reconsideration. As a result, the administrative reconsideration hearing mechanism does not adapt to the resolution of social contradictions, and is in great contrast to the needs of the public for administrative reconsideration. A large number of administrative disputes that should have been resolved through legal means are separated from the legal channels, and administrative reconsideration is delayed for a long time. Petitioning, visiting, tangling the phenomenon prominent. Through studying the practice of the foreign centralized administrative reconsideration system and the centralized administrative reconsideration right outside the province, combining the problems existing in the administrative reconsideration in Kunming and the advantages of the centralized administrative reconsideration power, this paper puts forward some practical countermeasures and suggestions on the centralized administrative reconsideration power. It is expected to contribute a little strength to the practice of the central administrative review power in Kunming.
【学位授予单位】：云南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.11;D630

【参考文献】