侵犯知识产权刑事犯罪入罪门槛问题研究

发布时间：2018-01-31 20:31

本文关键词： 知识产权犯罪犯罪门槛分门别类　出处：《法律适用》2016年12期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：加大知识产权司法保护力度一直是知识产权审判中坚持的重要司法精神。然而,就知识产权的刑事司法保护而言,应当强保护还是弱保护,理论界与实务界可谓是见仁见智。本文从实证数据入手,以我国法院审理的侵犯知识产权犯罪案件数量、给予刑事处罚的人数以及给予刑事处罚的刑期作为分析基点,反映出目前司法实务中对侵犯知识产权犯罪的处罚总体上呈现出一种扩大化、严重化的倾向。知识产权刑事司法保护的完善,应当在尊重侵犯知识产权犯罪客体特点的前提下,从注重严刑峻法的威慑力转而强调如何最大限度发挥知识产权刑事司法保护之效用,充分考虑刑法的谦抑性特点,分门别类地提高刑事犯罪门槛,辅之以其他的民事赔偿、行政制裁及刑事和解等替代措施。
[Abstract]:Strengthening the judicial protection of intellectual property has always been an important judicial spirit in intellectual property trials. However, as far as criminal judicial protection of intellectual property is concerned, whether to protect it strongly or weakly. The theoretical and practical circles can be said to be divided into different opinions. This paper starts with the empirical data and takes the number of criminal cases of intellectual property infringement tried by the courts in our country. The number of criminal punishment and the sentence of criminal punishment as the basis of analysis, reflecting the current judicial practice of the crime of intellectual property infringement penalties on the whole show a kind of expansion. The tendency of severity. The perfection of criminal judicial protection of intellectual property rights should be based on the respect of the characteristics of the object of crime against intellectual property rights. From focusing on the deterrent force of severe punishment to emphasizing how to maximize the effectiveness of criminal judicial protection of intellectual property, fully consider the modest characteristics of criminal law, and raise the threshold of criminal crime in different categories. It is supplemented by other alternative measures such as civil compensation, administrative sanctions and criminal reconciliation.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;重庆市第五中级人民法院;
【分类号】：D924.3
【正文快照】： 随着我国市场经济的不断发展,知识产权对经济发展的促进作用愈来愈大,加大知识产权保护力度一直以来作为我国的重要战略予以贯彻,而司法在保护知识产权的过程中又发挥着主导作用。随着我国在入世谈判中降低知识产权刑法保护门槛的承诺,在随后相关的司法解释中对刑事犯罪门槛进

【参考文献】