论专利侵权判定视野下权利要求的解释

发布时间：2018-04-05 16:38

本文选题：权利要求书　切入点：权利要求解释　出处：《广西民族大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着我国知识产权战略的实施，发展自主知识产权越来越得到人们的重视。专利制度作为知识产权的重要制度理应得到重视。专利权利要求解释是维护专利权人专利权的重要依据，是衡量一国专利发展水平的重要指标。文章以专利权利要求解释为线索，，对专利权利要求解释的概念与性质进行界定，对有权作出专利权利要求解释的主体进行评析，论述了专利权利要求解释的解释原则和侵权判定标准，最后结合我国当前立法现状提出建议。以期我国自主专利发展取得更高成就。全文共分四部分：第一部分对专利权利要求解释做了理论奠基。对专利权利要求解释的概念和性质做了界定。提出法院是进行专利权利解释的适格主体，对专利权利解释必要性进行分析，认为对专利权利进行合法合理的解释是专利制度发展的不竭动力。第二部分对专利权利解释的原则进行论述，介绍了“周边限定”、“中心限定”、“折中原则”等解释原则。提出了专利权利解释的贯常解释方法。第三部分介绍了专利权利解释的侵权判定方式。在不同判定原则下，对专利是否构成侵权的判定有不同的法律后果。第四部分结合我国当前的立法状况，寻求立法之空白。提出了法律完善建议。
[Abstract]:With the implementation of intellectual property strategy in China, people pay more and more attention to the development of independent intellectual property rights.Patent system as an important system of intellectual property rights should be attached importance to.The interpretation of patent claims is an important basis for maintaining patent rights of patentee and an important index to measure the level of patent development in a country.This paper defines the concept and nature of the interpretation of patent claims and comments on the subjects who have the right to interpret patent claims, taking the interpretation of patent claims as a clue.This paper discusses the interpretation principle of patent claim interpretation and the judgment standard of infringement, and finally puts forward some suggestions combined with the current legislation situation of our country.Expect our country independent patent development to obtain higher achievement.The full text is divided into four parts:The first part lays a theoretical foundation for the interpretation of patent claims.The concept and nature of the interpretation of patent claims are defined.It is pointed out that the court is the appropriate subject for the interpretation of patent rights. The necessity of the interpretation of patent rights is analyzed, and the legal and reasonable interpretation of patent rights is considered to be the inexhaustible motive force for the development of patent system.The second part discusses the principles of patent right interpretation, including peripheral limitation, central limitation and compromise principle.This paper puts forward the method of consistent interpretation of patent right interpretation.The third part introduces the way of infringement adjudication of patent right interpretation.Under different judgment principles, there are different legal consequences on whether a patent constitutes an infringement.The fourth part combines our country's current legislative situation, seeks the blank of legislation.Some suggestions for the perfection of the law are put forward.
【学位授予单位】：广西民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.42

【参考文献】