基于公共管理视角的人民监督员管理研究

发布时间：2018-01-09 04:31

本文关键词：基于公共管理视角的人民监督员管理研究　出处：《山东大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：政治学中常说"权力导致腐败,绝对的权力导致绝对的腐败" ①,由此可见对权力进行监督与制约的重要性。检察机关作为我国的法律监督机关,自身还承担侦查、起诉等多项职权,现实中就面临"谁来监督监督者"的问题。人民监督员制度,是我国检察机关2003年以"自我革命"的勇气主动推出的新生制度,通过选任公民参与案件监督或就检察工作提出意见建议的方式,实现对检察机关的有效监督。十三多年来,该制度经历了先期试行、全面推行、深化改革等多个阶段,由最初的检察机关自行选任,发展到2014年开始试点、2016年要求全面推开的司法行政机关管理模式;由最初的人民监督员根据检察机关的要求进行"被动监督",发展到现在人民监督员甚或其他人员也可申请启动监督;由最初的只能监督"三类案件"、"五种情形",发展到现在能监督"11种情形"。发展中的人民监督员制度可谓是对检察权运行监督机制的创新探索,契合政治民主、人权保障、司法公正等多种价值诉求。然而,任何制度都是逐步发展完善,任何改革都不可能一蹴而就,尤其是目前管理方式的改革,对司法行政机关来说是一个全新的命题。因此,本文拟从人民监督员制度的性质定位出发,用公共管理的知识去探究如何做好人民监督员的管理。在内容方面,本文首先对人民监督员管理的相关基础理论进行了研究,从人民监督员的概念及理论基础、人民监督员制度的性质定位及重要意义、人民监督员管理的概念界定及主要内容三个层次,确定了人民监督员管理的研究根基。在此基础上,重点回落到对人民监督员管理的历史沿革和现状分析,通过对发展历程、不同管理模式的比较,推导出司法行政机关管理模式是现阶段相对合理的选择,同时以S市司法行政机关管理人民监督员的实践为例,综观了司法行政机关管理人民监督员的具体情况。通过现状分析,本文提出了在管理实践中存在的各种问题,并探寻了问题背后的深层次原因。为解决现存问题,又探寻了国内外较为接近的制度,比较分析了日本检察审查会制度、美国大陪审团制度、我国人民陪审员制度、香港廉政公署咨询委员会制度及我国政府特邀监督员制度在管理方面的经验做法。最后,结合A省司法行政机关对全省人民监督员开展的调查问卷,进一步提出了改革完善我国人民监督员管理的对策建议。本文最主要的创新之处在于,从人民监督员制度的性质定位出发,从司法行政机关管理人民监督员的实际运行状况入手,从公共管理的视角进行研究,丰富了人民监督员管理的相关内容。
[Abstract]:In politics, it is often said that "power leads to corruption, absolute power leads to absolute corruption" 1.This shows the importance of supervision and restriction of power. The procuratorial organ is the legal supervisory organ of our country. In fact, it faces the problem of "who will supervise the supervisor" and the system of people's Supervisor. In 2003, the procuratorial organs of our country put forward the new system with the courage of "self-revolution", through the way of selecting citizens to participate in the supervision of cases or to put forward opinions and suggestions on procuratorial work. For more than 13 years, the system has experienced many stages, such as pilot, comprehensive implementation, deepening reform, and so on, which was selected by the original procuratorial organs. In 2014, the pilot project was started, and on 2016, the mode of administration of judicial administration was put forward. "passive supervision" was carried out by the original people's supervisors according to the requirements of the procuratorial organs, and now the people's supervisors or even other personnel can also apply for the initiation of supervision; From "three kinds of cases" and "five cases" to "11 situations", the developing people's Supervisor system is an innovative exploration of the supervisory mechanism of the operation of procuratorial power. Political democracy, human rights protection, judicial justice and other values. However, any system is gradually developed and improved, any reform can not be achieved overnight, especially the current management reform. It is a new proposition for judicial administrative organs. Therefore, this paper intends to use the knowledge of public management to explore how to do well in the management of people's supervisors from the perspective of the nature of the people's Supervisor system. Firstly, this paper studies the basic theory of the management of the people's supervisors, from the concept and theoretical basis of the people's supervisors, the nature of the people's supervisors and the significance of the system. This paper defines the concept and main content of the management of people's supervisors, and determines the research foundation of the management of people's supervisors. On this basis, the emphasis falls back to the historical evolution and analysis of the present situation of the management of people's supervisors. Through the comparison of the development course and the different management models, the author deduces that the judicial administrative organ management mode is a relatively reasonable choice at the present stage, and takes the practice of the administration of the people's supervisor of the judicial administrative organ in S city as an example. Through the analysis of the current situation, this paper puts forward various problems in the management practice. In order to solve the existing problems, and to explore the closer system at home and abroad, the comparative analysis of the Japanese procuratorial review committee system, the United States grand jury system. China's people's jury system, the Hong Kong Independent Commission against Corruption Advisory Committee system and our government's system of specially invited supervisors in the management of the experience. Finally. Combining with the questionnaire of the judicial administrative organs of A province to the people's supervisors of the whole province, this paper further puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions to reform and perfect the management of the people's supervisors in our country. The main innovation of this paper lies in the following. From the point of view of the nature of the people's Supervisor system, starting with the actual operation of the judicial administrative organs to manage the people's Supervisors, and studying from the perspective of public administration, this paper enriches the relevant contents of the people's Supervisors' management.
【学位授予单位】：山东大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.3

【相似文献】