温州“考绩法”在政府绩效评估中的应用研究
发布时间：2018-10-23 19:11
【摘要】：考绩,一个古老而常新的话题。早在我国先秦文献《尚书·舜典》中,就有对官吏实行“考绩”的介绍。在当今世界各国,考绩,更是对政府绩效和公务绩效进行考察评定、奖优罚劣时普遍采用的一种方式。近30年来,几乎全球所有政府和专家都将目光投向政府绩效评估研究,看好其巨大的理论研究意义和实践推广意义。在美国、英国、德国、日本等西方发达国家,都已经把政府绩效评估作为行政改革的突破口和“利器”。科学管理、民主管理、绩效管理已然成为政府推进各项改革的“总抓手”。“考绩”也成为公共管理的核心内容之一。 随着国内外研究实践的不断深入,政府绩效评估发挥了多方面作用,特别在提高政府效能、推动行风建设、促进信息公开、优化政府形象等方面,效果十分明显,在一定程度上形成了正确、良好的激励导向,对虚报浮夸、急功近利等情况,尤其是一些劳民伤财的形象工程和政绩工程也起到了有效的遏制作用。在各地各部门的实践中,涌现出了许多极具特色、各具优点的先进典型,大家不仅按照绩效评估的普遍要求进行操作,还在实践中融入个性化的探索,对完善理论体系和加快实践探索都起到了很好的促进作用。 温州是改革开放的先行区,在体制机制改革方面总能先行一步。为了确保完成“十二五”发展任务,更好地调动各地各部门、包括所有政府工作人员的积极性和干事创业热情,温州市委、市政府在紧密调研、校地合作的基础上,经过3个月的酝酿研究,终于在2011年1月份正式制定出台了《2011年度县(市、区)考绩法》、《2011年度市直单位考绩法》,是温州市对政府绩效评估工作的有益探索与尝试。该绩效考核评估办法在考核模式、内容设置、目标定位、考评方式、考核主体、考核导向等各方面都进行了大胆创新和大幅突破,尤其是该办法把政府绩效评估结果与干部的选拔任用和薪酬待遇相挂钩,极大地激励干部干事创业热情,这探索不仅是对“如何以科学的考核促进科学发展”重大命题的探索,更是对干部人事制度改革的深入思考和实践。相信这次探索实践的过程,会给政府绩效评估的理论研究和实践探索提供新的参考样本,也必将对面上的行政管理体制改革作出更多更大的贡献。 本文基于这些现行理论研究和实践经验,对温州近年来实施的“考绩法”进行综合分析研究,重点研究考谁的绩、考哪些绩、怎么考绩、结果怎么用等问题,引导广大领导干部进一步解放思想、转变作风,激发干事创业、创先争优的热情,力争扭转现有干部队伍中“先来后到”、“干多干少一个样,干好干坏一个样”等状况,通过考绩倒逼干部把工作作为一种事业为之奋斗,为政府绩效评估体系补上“一砖一瓦”。
[Abstract]:Performance appraisal is an old and often new topic. As early as in China's pre-Qin literature Shangshu Shun Dian, there is an introduction to the performance appraisal of officials. In today's world, performance appraisal is a common way to evaluate government performance and official performance. In the past 30 years, almost all the governments and experts all over the world have turned their attention to the research of government performance evaluation, which has great theoretical and practical significance. In the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan and other western developed countries, government performance evaluation has been regarded as a breakthrough and a "sharp weapon" in administrative reform. Scientific management, democratic management and performance management have become the "overall grasp" for the government to promote various reforms. Performance appraisal has also become one of the core contents of public administration. With the deepening of research and practice at home and abroad, government performance evaluation has played many roles, especially in improving the efficiency of the government, promoting the construction of customs, promoting the disclosure of information, optimizing the image of the government, and so on. To a certain extent, it has formed the correct, good incentive guidance, and has played an effective role in curbing the false exaggeration, eager achievement and instant benefit, especially in some image projects and achievements projects that have wasted people's money and people's wealth. In the practice of various departments in various places, there have emerged many advanced examples with their own characteristics and advantages. They not only operate in accordance with the general requirements of performance evaluation, but also incorporate individualized exploration in practice. To improve the theoretical system and speed up the exploration of practice has played a good role in promoting. Wenzhou is the leading area of reform and opening up, in the system and mechanism reform can always be a step ahead. In order to ensure the completion of the 12th Five-Year Plan development task and better mobilize the enthusiasm and enthusiasm of all local departments, including all government staff, Wenzhou Municipal Committee and Municipal Government, on the basis of close investigation and cooperation between schools and localities, After three months of gestation and research, the county (city, district) performance appraisal law of 2011 and the performance appraisal law of municipal direct-unit in 2011 were formulated in January 2011, which is a beneficial exploration and attempt to evaluate the government's performance in Wenzhou City. The performance appraisal method has made bold innovations and substantial breakthroughs in various aspects, such as assessment mode, content setting, target orientation, evaluation method, assessment subject, assessment orientation, and so on. In particular, this method links the results of government performance evaluation with the selection, appointment and salary of cadres, which greatly encourages cadres and officers to start a business. This exploration is not only an exploration of the important proposition of "how to promote scientific development with scientific assessment". It is to cadre personnel system reform deep thinking and practice. It is believed that the process of this exploration and practice will provide a new reference sample for the theoretical and practical research of government performance evaluation, and will certainly make more and more contributions to the reform of administrative management system. Based on the current theoretical research and practical experience, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the performance Appraisal Law, which has been implemented in Wenzhou in recent years, with an emphasis on the study of who's achievements, what achievements, how to evaluate performance, how to use the results, and so on. Leading the broad masses of leading cadres to further emancipate their minds, change their style of work, stimulate their entrepreneurial work, create enthusiasm for excellence, and strive to reverse the existing cadre ranks of "first come first, then come first," do more than do less, do a good job, and do a good job, "and so on. Through performance appraisal, cadres are forced to fight for their work as a career and complement the government performance evaluation system with "brick by brick".
【学位授予单位】：江西农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D630
本文编号：2290220
[Abstract]:Performance appraisal is an old and often new topic. As early as in China's pre-Qin literature Shangshu Shun Dian, there is an introduction to the performance appraisal of officials. In today's world, performance appraisal is a common way to evaluate government performance and official performance. In the past 30 years, almost all the governments and experts all over the world have turned their attention to the research of government performance evaluation, which has great theoretical and practical significance. In the United States, Britain, Germany, Japan and other western developed countries, government performance evaluation has been regarded as a breakthrough and a "sharp weapon" in administrative reform. Scientific management, democratic management and performance management have become the "overall grasp" for the government to promote various reforms. Performance appraisal has also become one of the core contents of public administration. With the deepening of research and practice at home and abroad, government performance evaluation has played many roles, especially in improving the efficiency of the government, promoting the construction of customs, promoting the disclosure of information, optimizing the image of the government, and so on. To a certain extent, it has formed the correct, good incentive guidance, and has played an effective role in curbing the false exaggeration, eager achievement and instant benefit, especially in some image projects and achievements projects that have wasted people's money and people's wealth. In the practice of various departments in various places, there have emerged many advanced examples with their own characteristics and advantages. They not only operate in accordance with the general requirements of performance evaluation, but also incorporate individualized exploration in practice. To improve the theoretical system and speed up the exploration of practice has played a good role in promoting. Wenzhou is the leading area of reform and opening up, in the system and mechanism reform can always be a step ahead. In order to ensure the completion of the 12th Five-Year Plan development task and better mobilize the enthusiasm and enthusiasm of all local departments, including all government staff, Wenzhou Municipal Committee and Municipal Government, on the basis of close investigation and cooperation between schools and localities, After three months of gestation and research, the county (city, district) performance appraisal law of 2011 and the performance appraisal law of municipal direct-unit in 2011 were formulated in January 2011, which is a beneficial exploration and attempt to evaluate the government's performance in Wenzhou City. The performance appraisal method has made bold innovations and substantial breakthroughs in various aspects, such as assessment mode, content setting, target orientation, evaluation method, assessment subject, assessment orientation, and so on. In particular, this method links the results of government performance evaluation with the selection, appointment and salary of cadres, which greatly encourages cadres and officers to start a business. This exploration is not only an exploration of the important proposition of "how to promote scientific development with scientific assessment". It is to cadre personnel system reform deep thinking and practice. It is believed that the process of this exploration and practice will provide a new reference sample for the theoretical and practical research of government performance evaluation, and will certainly make more and more contributions to the reform of administrative management system. Based on the current theoretical research and practical experience, this paper makes a comprehensive analysis of the performance Appraisal Law, which has been implemented in Wenzhou in recent years, with an emphasis on the study of who's achievements, what achievements, how to evaluate performance, how to use the results, and so on. Leading the broad masses of leading cadres to further emancipate their minds, change their style of work, stimulate their entrepreneurial work, create enthusiasm for excellence, and strive to reverse the existing cadre ranks of "first come first, then come first," do more than do less, do a good job, and do a good job, "and so on. Through performance appraisal, cadres are forced to fight for their work as a career and complement the government performance evaluation system with "brick by brick".
【学位授予单位】：江西农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 陈旭东;公共选择视角下的公共预算理念[J];当代财经;2005年07期
2 张金芬;;完善我国地方政府绩效评估的途径分析[J];当代世界与社会主义;2010年04期
3 胡税根;金玲玲;;我国政府绩效管理和评估法制化问题研究[J];公共管理学报;2007年01期
4 马亮;;官员晋升激励与政府绩效目标设置——中国省级面板数据的实证研究[J];公共管理学报;2013年02期
5 包国宪;周云飞;;政府绩效评价的价值载体模型构建研究[J];公共管理学报;2013年02期
6 蔡立辉;西方国家政府绩效评估的理念及其启示[J];清华大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 陈巍;绩效评估与政府责任机制创新研究[D];湘潭大学;2013年
，本文编号：2290220
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/gonggongguanlilunwen/2290220.html
