海南森林公园旅游承载力研究

发布时间：2018-06-24 18:46

本文选题：森林旅游 + 森林公园　；参考：《海南师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：森林旅游作为一种极具特色的新兴旅游,具有巨大的环境效益、经济效益和社会效益。森林旅游承载力研究是森林旅游开发、规划与管理的重要工具。森林公园是森林旅游事业发展最重要的阵地,已经成为重要的旅游目的地之一。因此,正确地评价森林公园旅游承载力,对实现可持续发展框架下的森林旅游高效运营和管理起着至关重要的作用,同时也为森林旅游资源开发和环境保护提供决策依据。海南是我国重要热带地区,热带森林资源丰富。海南森林旅游不仅在全国森林旅游体系中占有重要地位,同时还具有十分巨大的发展潜力。因此,开展海南森林公园旅游承载力研究,对海南森林旅游可持续发展具有至关重要的作用。本研究首先通过对国内外森林旅游承载力研究相关文献进行梳理,归纳总结森林旅游承载力的相关概念、定义、构成和评价方法;其次,基于森林旅游承载力评价相关理论,在海南选取1个国家级和1个市县级森林公园为实证案例,具体为海南七仙岭温泉国家森林公园和三亚亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园,结合实地踏勘和问卷调查,测算并评价案例景区的旅游承载力;最后,结合理论研究与实证案例研究,从景区最大承载力提升方向和游客流量控制联动系统等方面,对海南森林公园资源空间承载力、经济承载力、社会承载力提出调控对策和建议。研究结果表明:(1)旅游资源空间承载力:根据七仙岭温泉国家森林公园和亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园地形特点和布局模式,采用线状模型对其空间承载力进行测算,七仙岭温泉国家森林公园瞬时资源空间承载力为2765人,日合理资源空间承载力为8295人;亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园瞬时资源空间承载力为10000人,日合理资源空间承载力为20000人。(2)旅游经济承载力:根据对游客进行抽样问卷调查的结果,选取停车位和公共厕所数量对实证案例景区设施承载力进行测评,七仙岭温泉国家森林公园停车场瞬时设施承载力为109辆,日合理设施承载力为6650人,公共厕所设施承载力为11475人和5100人,故其日合理经济承载力为5100人;亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园停车场瞬时设施承载力为284辆,日合理设施承载力为8746人,公共厕所设施承载力为54000人和24000人,故其日合理经济承载力为8746人。(3)旅游社会承载力:两个案例景区均距市区较远,景区附近居民点较少,森林公园旅游活动也未对当地居民生活、工作产生不利影响,反而在一定程度上促进了本地社会经济的发展,本地居民对森林公园旅游活动普遍肯定和欢迎,其居民心理承载力可视为无穷大。以视觉、听觉、触觉和行动感受四个方面的游客体验满意程度作为评价指标,以游客最为敏感的感受获得权重。在此基础上计算,得到七仙岭温泉国家森林公园的瞬时游客心理承载力为1525人,日合理游客心理承载力为4575人,瞬时最适游客心理承载力为730人,日最适游客心理承载力为2190人。亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园的瞬时游客心理承载力为9721人,日合理游客心理承载力为19442人,瞬时最适游客心理承载力为1968人,日最适游客心理承载力为3936人。因此,七仙岭温泉国家森林公园和亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园日合理社会承载力分别为4575人和19442人。(4)实证案例比较分析:从旅游空间承载力来看,七仙岭温泉国家森林公园与亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园旅游空间承载量相差较大,主要是由于景区布局模式、游道线路布局及游览线路方向上的不同造成。从旅游设施承载力来看,七仙岭温泉国家森林公园明显差于亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园,主要是受4A级景区评定时间影响较大,七仙岭温泉国家森林公园开发时间较晚,基础设施投入不足,其旅游设施承载力较差。目前,居民心理承载力尚未成为七仙岭温泉国家森林公园和亚龙湾热带天堂森林公园发展的限制性因素,而两者游客心理承载力存在较大差异,特别是最适心理承载力差异较大,主要是由于两个景区游客的出游方式有差异,在旅游目的、停留时间上也明显不同,游客满意程度差异较大。(5)对策与建议:针对2个实证案例的旅游承载力测算与比较分析,对于森林公园旅游承载力的调控,一方面,通过提升景区最大承载力,包括提高空间和设施承载量和提升居民与游客心理承载量;另一方面,建立游客流量控制联动系统调控,包括政府外部系统和景区内部系统调控。
[Abstract]:Forest tourism, as a special kind of new tourism, has great environmental benefits, economic and social benefits. The study of forest tourism carrying capacity is an important tool for forest tourism development, planning and management. Forest Park is the most important position in the development of forest tourism and has become one of the important tourist destinations. The evaluation of the tourist capacity of Forest Park is very important for the efficient operation and management of Forest Tourism under the framework of sustainable development. It also provides a decision basis for the development of forest tourism resources and environmental protection. Hainan is an important tropical area in China, and the tropical forest resources are rich. Hainan forest tourism is not only in the country. In the forest tourism system, it occupies an important position and has great potential for development. Therefore, it is very important for the sustainable development of the forest tourism in Hainan to carry out the research on the tourism carrying capacity of the Forest Park in Hainan. First, the research is summarized and summarized by the related literature on the research of the carrying capacity of forest tourism at home and abroad. The related concepts, definitions, composition and evaluation methods of forest tourism carrying capacity; secondly, based on the related theories of forest tourism carrying capacity evaluation, 1 national and 1 city county-level Forest Park are selected in Hainan as an empirical case, specifically for the seven Xian Ling hot spring national Forest Park in Hainan and Sanya Yalong Bay tropical paradise. Survey and questionnaire survey, calculate and evaluate the tourist carrying capacity of the case scenic area; finally, combining theoretical research and empirical case study, from the aspect of the direction of the maximum carrying capacity and the control of tourist flow, the paper puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions on the spatial carrying capacity, economic load capacity and social carrying capacity of the Forest Park in Hainan. The results show that: (1) the spatial carrying capacity of tourism resources: according to the topography characteristics and layout patterns of the seven Xian Ling hot spring national Forest Park and Yalong Bay tropical paradise Forest Park, the spatial bearing capacity of the seven Xian Ling hot spring countries is calculated by the linear model, and the spatial bearing capacity of the instantaneous resources of the seven Xian Ling hot springs is 2765. The force is 8295 people; the spatial carrying capacity of the instantaneous resource space of Yalong Bay tropical paradise Forest Park is 10000 people, and the daily rational resource space carrying capacity is 20000 people. (2) the tourist economic bearing capacity: according to the survey result of the sampling survey on tourists, the parking space and the number of public toilet are selected to evaluate the bearing capacity of the demonstration case scenic area, seven Xian Ling temperature. The instantaneous facilities bearing capacity of the park of the spring national Forest Park is 109, the carrying capacity of the daily reasonable facilities is 6650, the carrying capacity of the public toilet facilities is 11475 and 5100, so the daily reasonable economic carrying capacity of the park is 5100, and the instantaneous facilities carrying capacity of the Yalong Bay Park's Forest Park park are 284 vehicles, and the daily reasonable facilities carrying capacity of 8746 people. The carrying capacity of the toilet facilities is 54000 people and 24000 people, so the reasonable economic carrying capacity of its day is 8746 people. (3) the social carrying capacity of tourist Society: two case scenic spots are far away from the urban area, and the residents in the vicinity of the scenic spot are less. The Forest Park tourism has not had a negative impact on the local residents and work production. On the contrary, it has promoted the local society to a certain extent. With the development of the economy, local residents generally affirm and welcome the tourist activities of Forest Park. Their residents' psychological bearing capacity can be regarded as infinity. The tourist experience satisfaction of four aspects of vision, hearing, touch and action is regarded as the evaluation index, and the most sensitive feelings of tourists are weighted. On this basis, the seven Xian Ling is calculated. The psychological bearing capacity of the instantaneous tourists in the hot spring national Forest Park is 1525, the psychological carrying capacity of the Japanese tourists is 4575, the instantaneous most suitable psychological bearing capacity is 730, and the psychological bearing capacity of the most suitable tourists is 2190. The psychological bearing capacity of Yalong Bay's Forest Park's instantaneous tourists is 9721, and the psychological carrying capacity of the Japanese tourists is 19 442 people, the instantaneous optimum tourist psychological bearing capacity is 1968 people, and the most suitable tourist psychological bearing capacity is 3936. Therefore, the reasonable social carrying capacity of the seven Xian Ling hot spring national Forest Park and Yalong Bay tropical paradise Forest Park is 4575 and 19442 respectively. (4) an empirical case analysis: from the view of the tourist space carrying capacity, the seven Xian Ling hot spring countries The space carrying capacity of home Forest Park and Yalong Bay tropical paradise Forest Park is quite different, mainly due to the layout pattern of scenic spots, the layout of the route route and the different direction of the tour route. From the bearing capacity of the tourist facilities, the seven Xian Ling hot spring countries are obviously worse than the tropical paradise. The evaluation time of 4A level scenic area has great influence. Seven Xian Ling hot spring national Forest Park is late in development time, insufficient infrastructure investment and poor carrying capacity of tourism facilities. At present, the psychological bearing capacity of residents has not become the limiting factor for the development of Forest Park in the seven Xian Ling hot Spring National Forest Park and Yalong Bay tropical paradise, and the tourists' Psychology There are great differences in carrying capacity, especially the most suitable psychological bearing capacity difference, mainly due to the difference in the way tourists travel in two scenic spots, in the tourist destination, the stay time is also obviously different, the tourist satisfaction degree is different. (5) the countermeasures and suggestions: for the 2 cases of tourism carrying capacity measurement and comparative analysis, for Sen On the one hand, the control of tourism carrying capacity of Forest Park, on the one hand, by raising the maximum carrying capacity of the scenic area, including improving the capacity of space and facilities and improving the psychological bearing capacity of the residents and tourists; on the other hand, establishing the control of the linkage system of tourist flow control, including the external system of the government and the internal system control of the interior of the scenic area.
【学位授予单位】：海南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F592.7

【参考文献】