雇主品牌与工作场所反生产行为关系实证研究
发布时间：2019-08-05 12:32
【摘要】：组织公民行为的对立面—反生产行为在企业中已普遍存在,且具有多样性、隐蔽性和破坏性等特征,愈发引起研究者和管理者的高度关注。本文基于在职员工的雇佣体验,以"行为认知"为主线,探索内外部结合视角的雇主品牌与员工反生产行为之间的关系。文章以北疆地区国有企业为例,通过对230份问卷处理分析,得出相关结论,以为雇主品牌对工作场所员工反生产行为具有显著负向影响,但其具体维度对反生产行为的作用有所不同。
[Abstract]:The opposite of organizational citizenship behavior-anti-production behavior has been widespread in enterprises, and has the characteristics of diversity, concealment and destruction, which has attracted more and more attention of researchers and managers. Based on the employment experience of in-service employees and taking "behavior cognition" as the main line, this paper explores the relationship between employer brand and employees' anti-production behavior from the perspective of internal and external integration. Taking the state-owned enterprises in northern Xinjiang as an example, through the analysis of 230 questionnaires, this paper draws the conclusion that the employer brand has a significant negative impact on the anti-production behavior of employees in the workplace, but its specific dimensions have different effects on the anti-production behavior.
【作者单位】： 石河子大学经济与管理学院;
【基金】：新疆兵团软科学规划项目,兵团中小企业核心竞争力,项目编号:2011BB029
【分类号】：F272.92;F224
[Abstract]:The opposite of organizational citizenship behavior-anti-production behavior has been widespread in enterprises, and has the characteristics of diversity, concealment and destruction, which has attracted more and more attention of researchers and managers. Based on the employment experience of in-service employees and taking "behavior cognition" as the main line, this paper explores the relationship between employer brand and employees' anti-production behavior from the perspective of internal and external integration. Taking the state-owned enterprises in northern Xinjiang as an example, through the analysis of 230 questionnaires, this paper draws the conclusion that the employer brand has a significant negative impact on the anti-production behavior of employees in the workplace, but its specific dimensions have different effects on the anti-production behavior.
【作者单位】： 石河子大学经济与管理学院;
【基金】：新疆兵团软科学规划项目,兵团中小企业核心竞争力,项目编号:2011BB029
【分类号】：F272.92;F224
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 雍少宏;朱丽娅;;益组织行为与损组织行为:中国特征的角色外行为模型及其经验实证[J];管理学报;2013年01期
2 张建卫;刘玉新;;企业反生产行为:概念与结构解析[J];心理科学进展;2009年05期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 肖友琴;程刚;;反生产行为研究亟待解决的几个问题[J];广西广播电视大学学报;2012年02期
2 谭亚莉;廖建桥;李骥;;管理者非伦理行为到组织腐败的衍变过程、机制与干预:基于心理社会微观视角的分析[J];管理世界;2011年12期
3 肖友琴;程刚;;企业员工反生产行为结构的实证研究[J];贵州师范学院学报;2012年05期
4 吴粒;张晓俊;陆小丽;彭慧平;;会计师事务所伦理气氛类型研究[J];财会通讯;2014年07期
5 高雪原;;人格与反生产行为关系研究综述[J];经营管理者;2014年07期
6 王妍媛;陈同扬;;80后员工的反生产行为研究及其管理应对[J];生产力研究;2012年05期
7 焦s，
本文编号：2523124
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/pinpaiwenhualunwen/2523124.html
