管理效率的伦理冲突研究

发布时间：2018-08-22 21:16

【摘要】：管理效率的高低可以反映管理水平乃至于组织运行目标的实现。为了既定管理目标,如何提高管理效率一直是管理者们思考问题的重心所在。但是,如果将管理效率的提高抽象化,就会招致一系列伦理冲突。具体表现为：为了追求效率摒弃诚信,放弃公平,破坏环境。我们追求效率,却被效率所困。这是对效率的背叛。文章首先对于管理效率的特点,伦理价值进行相关讨论,提出管理效率本身是可以履行组织社会责任,实现人和自然的和谐共处。但是,在现实中恰恰反映出某种伦理冲突,集中表现为：一,效率和诚信；二,效率和公平；三,效率和可持续发展。对此,文章从个人主义、功利主义和工具理性等方面进行了分析。提出：个人主义认为一切的实践活动都是为了满足自身的生存和发展需要,以自身利益为出发点和归宿,必然导致伦理冲突。而功利主义会迫使管理者不断放大对有形利益的追逐,注重了当前利益,而非长远利益。工具理性强调了追求事物的最大功效,使得个人利益至上的思维达到了极致。三个方面相辅相成,促成了伦理冲突的形成。最后文章提出,伦理冲突的化解,还是要懂得尊重人性中的人文情怀。同时,我们要尽快建立有序的竞争机制和合理有效配置制度。只要这样,我们才可能树立正确的价值观,找到人和自然发展的平衡。管理效率的伦理冲突是一个极其复杂的问题,因为伦理本身的内容会随着不同的时间和空间而发生相应的变化。但是,对伦理冲突的重视并进行合理性的思考,才能让管理效率符合其为人类服务的意义。而当人性得到足够的尊重,才能实现更高的效率。两者相互影响,促进了人类的发展和社会的可持续。
[Abstract]:The level of management efficiency can reflect the level of management and even the realization of organizational operational goals. How to improve management efficiency is always the focus of managers' thinking in order to set management objectives. However, if the management efficiency is abstracted, it will lead to a series of ethical conflicts. In order to pursue efficiency, abandon honesty, give up fairness and destroy environment. We pursue efficiency, but we are trapped by efficiency. This is a betrayal of efficiency. Firstly, the paper discusses the characteristics and ethical value of management efficiency, and points out that management efficiency itself can fulfill the social responsibility of organization and realize the harmonious coexistence of man and nature. However, it reflects a kind of ethical conflict in reality, which mainly shows as follows: first, efficiency and honesty; second, efficiency and fairness; third, efficiency and sustainable development. In this paper, individualism, utilitarianism and instrumental rationality are analyzed. The author points out that individualism holds that all practical activities are designed to meet the needs of their own survival and development, and take their own interests as the starting point and destination, which will inevitably lead to ethical conflicts. Utilitarianism forces managers to enlarge their pursuit of tangible interests, focusing on immediate interests rather than long-term interests. Instrumental rationality emphasizes the maximum effect of pursuing things and makes the thinking of individual benefit supreme. The three aspects complement each other and contribute to the formation of ethical conflicts. Finally, the article points out that to resolve ethical conflicts, we should know how to respect the humanistic feelings in human nature. At the same time, we should establish an orderly competition mechanism and reasonable and effective allocation system as soon as possible. Only in this way can we establish correct values and find a balance between human and natural development. The ethical conflict of management efficiency is an extremely complex problem, because the content of ethics itself will change with different time and space. However, the importance of ethical conflict and rational thinking can make management efficiency conform to its significance of serving human beings. And when human nature gets enough respect, can achieve higher efficiency. The two influence each other and promote human development and social sustainability.
【学位授予单位】：广西大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：C93-02

【相似文献】