国家动员及其效果:以反腐败为例

发布时间：2018-04-22 05:11

本文选题：公共部门腐败行为 + 动员机制　；参考：《武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年01期

【摘要】：借鉴公共和私人官僚制理论分析思路,从现有文献中,可以归纳出动员式治理的三个动员机制:强化激励、行政控制和资源动员。以十八大以来的腐败治理为例,对Q市258个机构问卷调查数据的分析结果表明:反腐动员使得显性和隐性两类腐败行为发生频率都明显下降,且显性腐败行为治理效果更佳。两类腐败行为发生频率都受到十八大前发生频率的影响,体现出明显的路径依赖效应。三个动员机制均在反腐风暴中得到运用,但其效果有所不同。组织系统内部临时性资源动员未对腐败行为产生影响。问责力度和具有法治意义的行政控制都起到了抑制腐败行为的作用。反腐败这一自我革命型政治动员,其动员机制的特殊性值得强调。维持腐败惩处力度并进一步推动法治进程是腐败治理的有效方式。
[Abstract]:Based on the theoretical analysis of public and private bureaucracy, three mobilization mechanisms of mobilizing governance can be concluded from the existing literature: strengthening incentive, administrative control and resource mobilization. Taking corruption governance since 18th National Congress as an example, the results of questionnaire survey on 258 institutions in Q City show that anti-corruption mobilization makes the frequency of both explicit and implicit corruption obviously lower, and the governance effect of dominant corruption is better. The frequency of both kinds of corruption is influenced by the frequency before the 18th CPC Congress, which reflects the obvious path dependence effect. The three mobilization mechanisms have been used in the anti-corruption storm, but their effects are different. Temporary resource mobilization within the organizational system did not have an impact on corruption. Accountability and administrative control with the meaning of rule of law have played a role in curbing corruption. Anti-corruption, a self-revolutionary political mobilization, the particularity of its mobilization mechanism should be emphasized. Maintaining corruption punishment and further promoting the process of rule of law are effective ways to govern corruption.
【作者单位】：华侨大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金青年项目(11CGL094)
【分类号】：D035.4

【参考文献】