我国政府信息公开不作为的责任追究

发布时间：2018-06-01 11:22

本文选题：政府信息公开不作为 + 政治责任　；参考：《湖南师范大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：2008年5月1日,被称为“阳光法案”的《中华人民共和国信息公开条例》(以下简称《条例》)的出台,标志着我国政府信息公开工作进入了新的阶段,但是由于我国在这方面的研究起步晚,受传统思想的禁锢,信息公开工作仍然有着很多的不足之处。由于缺乏政府信息公开的内在动因和外在推力,我国信息公开方面虽然“有法可依”,但是,执法不严的现象严重,政府信息公开不作为已然成为阻碍我国公民政治参与的一大因素。对于政府信息公开不作为,政府肩负有怎样的责任?本文认为应该从政治责任、道德责任和法律责任三个方面来探究。目前对于政府信息公开不作为的法律责任的研究比较多,而道德责任和政治责任的研究相对较少;笔者认为,作为政府责任的法理基础,政治责任和道德责任的探究应该得到关注,政府作为公共服务的提供者,应该更多的从自身的“本职应当”的角度来认识政府信息公开的意义,所谓“积极的责任是责任实现的最理想方式”。其次在政府信息公开不作为的问责方面,受行政问责主客体责任不明确,问责动力不足,道德问责缺位,法律问责不够完善等因素的影响,政府信息公开不作为的问责工作难以开展,《条例》无法得到真正的执行落地。对于此现象,本文建议从加大宣传力度,培养信息公开不作为问责文化;明确问责主体责任意识,强化同体问责和异体问责;细化、明确问责客体范围;健全政府信息公开不作为问责法律体系等四个方面来加强政府信息公开不作为的问责工作。
[Abstract]:On May 1, 2008, the publication of the regulations of the people's Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as "regulations"), which is called "Sunshine Act", marked a new stage in the work of government information disclosure in China. However, due to the late start of our country's research in this area and the imprisonment of traditional ideas, the work of information disclosure still has a lot of shortcomings. Due to the lack of internal motivation and external thrust of government information disclosure, although there are "laws to be followed" in our country's information disclosure, the phenomenon of lax enforcement of the law is serious. The omission of government information disclosure has become a major factor hindering the political participation of citizens in our country. What is the responsibility of the government to make government information public? This article holds that it should be explored from three aspects: political responsibility, moral responsibility and legal responsibility. At present, there are more researches on the legal liability of government information disclosure omission, but less on moral responsibility and political responsibility. The exploration of political responsibility and moral responsibility should be paid attention to, and the government, as the provider of public service, should understand the significance of government information disclosure from the angle of its own "duty should". The so-called "positive responsibility is the most ideal way to achieve responsibility." Secondly, in the aspect of the accountability for the omission of government information disclosure, it is affected by the lack of clear responsibility of the subject and object of administrative accountability, the lack of motivation of accountability, the absence of moral accountability, the imperfect of legal accountability, and so on. The accountability of government information disclosure is difficult to carry out, and the regulations cannot be truly enforced. For this phenomenon, this paper suggests that we should strengthen publicity, cultivate the culture of non-accountability of information disclosure, make clear the responsibility consciousness of accountability subject, strengthen homogeneity accountability and heterogeneous accountability, refine and clarify the scope of accountability object. Improve the legal system of accountability of government information disclosure omission to strengthen the accountability work of government information disclosure omission.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D63

【相似文献】