我国行政问责官员复出的规范化研究

发布时间：2018-06-28 14:36

本文选题：行政问责 + 对策　；参考：《扬州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：行政问责制的建设与发展是我国行政体制改革一道亮丽的风景线,自2003年大规模开展以来,取得相当不错的成绩,社会大众对行政问责所提交的成绩单也相对较为满意,然而伴随着行政问责制的蒸蒸日上的发展,无论理论还是实践起步都比较晚的被问责官员的复出似乎并非令人十分满意。实践中,行政问责官员非规范复出的案例比比皆是,各种暗箱操作,各种不按正常程序,社会大众对被问责官员的非规范复出也是深恶痛绝。长久以往,行政问责官员的非规范复出似乎更逐渐演变成一种潜规则,这样不仅削弱了社会大众对于政府的信任,我国政府长期建立的公信力就此逐步减弱,行政问责制所取得成效也被大打折扣。而在我国理论界,对于行政问责官员复出的研究更是稀缺,法学界对该课题的研究凤毛麟角,大多学者将视角都停在了行政问责课题的探究上。然而,行政问责官员复出的研究实际对于推动我国属于当下热门的行政问责制的建设只会锦上添花,画龙点睛。所以,我们必须重视对于行政问责官员复出课题相关的理论研究,而在有关该课题的诸多研究角度中,笔者以为我国行政问责官员复出的对策研究应该是非常重要的一个方面,只有如此,我们的行政问责建设才能日趋完善,行政体制改革才能收获显著成效。在本篇论文的研究中,笔者主要分为五大部分,首先是文章的导论,引入研究的主题,激起读者的兴趣。其次,通过对行政问责官员复出在我国的现状探析,本部分的内容最重要的是分析所存在的一些问题,分析其背后的原因。再次,撰写文章的理论部分。本部分主要是通过对行政问责官员复出进行一个界定,探究被问责官员复出的必要性以及其存在的重要理论。必须洞悉与行政问责官员复出相关的基础理论,才可以更深刻理解本文撰写主题。接下来,笔者将对如何规范行政问责官员复出进行透彻的解析。在这部分主要提出四大对策,主要是法律制度、程序设计、监督机制和文化建设几个方面。最后为本文的结语部分。本文的大致结构框架便是如此。笔者力求通过对规范行政问责官员复出的对策研究,对我国行政问责官员复出的法治建设提出自已的拙见,以此期望我国行政问责制的建设能够长远科学的发展,能够在法治的轨道上健康运行,从而为我国法治社会,和谐社会的建设扫清障碍,消除阻力,为我国的长治久安,人民的幸福生活保驾护航。
[Abstract]:The construction and development of administrative accountability system is a beautiful landscape of administrative system reform in our country. Since its large-scale development in 2003, it has achieved quite good results, and the public is relatively satisfied with the report card submitted by the administrative accountability system. However, with the development of the administrative accountability system, the return of the accountable officials, both in theory and practice, does not seem to be very satisfactory. In practice, the non-standard return of administrative accountability officials cases abound, a variety of dark box operation, a variety of non-normal procedures, the public is also abhorrent to the non-standard return of accountable officials. For a long time, it seems that the non-standard return of administrative accountability officials has gradually evolved into a hidden rule, which not only weakens the trust of the public in the government, but also weakens the credibility established by our government for a long time. The effectiveness of the administrative accountability system has also been greatly compromised. In the theoretical circle of our country, the research on the return of the administrative accountability officials is even scarcer, and the research on the subject is rare in the field of law. Most scholars stop to explore the subject of administrative accountability. However, the study of the return of administrative accountability officials will only add to the success of the construction of administrative accountability system, which is a hot issue in our country. Therefore, we must attach importance to the relevant theoretical research on the issue of the return of administrative accountability officials, and in the various research angles on this subject, the author thinks that the countermeasure study on the return of administrative accountability officials in China should be a very important aspect. Only in this way, our administrative accountability construction can be perfected day by day, and the reform of administrative system can achieve remarkable results. In the research of this thesis, the author mainly divides into five parts, first is the introduction of the article, introduces the research topic, arouses the reader's interest. Secondly, through the analysis of the current situation of the return of administrative accountability officials in our country, the most important part of this part is to analyze some existing problems and analyze the reasons behind them. Third, write the theoretical part of the article. This part is mainly through the administrative accountability officials return to a definition, to explore the need for accountability officials to return and its important theory of existence. In order to understand the theme of this article, we must have insight into the basic theories related to the return of administrative accountability officials. Next, the author will make a thorough analysis on how to standardize the return of administrative accountability officials. In this part, four countermeasures are put forward, including legal system, program design, supervision mechanism and cultural construction. The last part is the conclusion of this paper. This is the general framework of the structure of this paper. The author tries his best to put forward his own views on the rule of law construction of our country's administrative accountability officials by studying the countermeasures of standardizing the return of administrative accountability officials, so as to hope that the construction of administrative accountability system in our country can develop scientifically in the long run. It can run healthily on the track of rule of law, thus clear the obstacle for the construction of our country's rule of law society and harmonious society, eliminate the resistance, and protect our country's long-term stability and the people's happy life.
【学位授予单位】：扬州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D630.3

【相似文献】