善治视野下邻避运动的政府应对
发布时间：2018-10-17 11:54
【摘要】：随着改革开放的日益深入和我国现代化建设的脚步加强,人民的生活水平也越来越高。为了满足人民精神和物质生活上的需求,政府需要建设大量的公共设施。这些公共设施有的能给民众带来身心愉悦,如：图书馆、开放式泳池等；有的却让人退避三舍,如：殡仪馆、垃圾焚烧厂等。虽然明知道政府建设此类设施是为了服务大众,但是因为其带来的一些负面影响,譬如：居住周边环境污染以及楼盘价值的贬值等,所以每当政府建设此类设施时总会受到居民的反对。这就是近年来在我国经常发生的“邻避运动”。邻避现象是随着城市发展而产生的,近年来受到越来越多学者专家的关注,而如何解决邻避运动也是对政府的一大挑战。本文共有七章。第一章绪论主要是通过查阅相关资料对国内外邻避运动研究现状进行梳理并展示本文的研究方法和路线以及创新和不足之处。第二章通过文献分析法,在对国内外学者关于邻避运动的研究文献进行大量阅读的基础上,界定了邻避运动、邻避设施和邻避冲突的内涵,并且对本文的支持理论：善治理论和网络化治理理论进行论述。第三章分析了在我国“新型城镇化”建设背景下,我国邻避运动产生的原因：经济、政策和心理原因以及其正负影响。第四章是本文的核心部分,以汉阳区锅顶山垃圾焚烧厂项目和广东化州丽岗镇政府火葬场建设项目为例,深入探讨了在利益价值链下,政府应对邻避运动的困境：邻避运动变成邻避冲突和政府被动屈服的取消邻避设施的建设,并剖析其产生原因：风险信息缺失、社区组织的自利目的、邻避情结的认知因素的先入为主、有关环保方面的法律救济制度的缺失、政府层面上决策体制的滞后以及政企未分。第五章通过比较分析法对美国邻避运动的对比研究而得到对我国政府处理邻避运动的启示。第六章结合我国邻避运动产生的实际原因以及上述两个案例邻避运动的实际困境,提出了解决城市发展中政府应对邻避问题而应该采取的治理模式：网络化治理模式。同时指出通过构建利益补偿机制、法律救济机制和协作治理机制来减少邻避运动变成邻避冲突的可能性；通过建立决策科学民主和信息公开原则来减少公众对邻避设施的邻避情结。第七章是对本文的总结。
[Abstract]:With the deepening of reform and opening up and the pace of modernization in China, the people's living standards are becoming higher and higher. In order to meet the spiritual and material needs of the people, the government needs to build a large number of public facilities. Some of these public facilities can bring people physical and mental pleasure, such as libraries, open swimming pools, but others let people avoid, such as funeral homes, incinerators and so on. Although it is well known that the government is building such facilities to serve the public, but because of some negative effects, such as the environmental pollution around housing and the depreciation of property values, etc. So every time the government builds such facilities, there is always opposition from the residents. This is the "neighborhood avoidance movement" that often occurs in our country in recent years. The phenomenon of neighborhood avoidance comes into being with the development of city. In recent years, more and more scholars and experts pay attention to it, and how to solve it is a great challenge to the government. There are seven chapters in this paper. The first chapter is an introduction to the current situation of the study of neighborhood avoidance movement at home and abroad by consulting relevant data and to show the research methods and routes as well as innovation and shortcomings of this paper. The second chapter through the literature analysis, on the basis of a large number of scholars at home and abroad on the basis of the study of the movement of neighborhood avoidance, the definition of adjacent avoidance movement, adjacent avoidance facilities and adjacent avoidance of conflict connotation. And the supporting theory: good governance theory and network governance theory are discussed. The third chapter analyzes the causes of the "new urbanization" construction in China: economic, policy and psychological reasons and its positive and negative effects. The fourth chapter is the core part of this paper, taking the project of Guodingshan garbage incinerator in Hanyang district and the construction project of government crematorium in Ligang town of Huazhou city as examples, the paper deeply discusses the value chain of benefits. The government should deal with the dilemma of the neighboring avoidance movement: the adjacent avoidance movement becomes the neighbor avoidance movement and the government passively succumbs to the construction of the adjacent avoidance facilities, and analyzes the causes: the lack of risk information, the self-interest purpose of the community organization, The cognitive factors of neighboring avoidance complex are preconceived, the legal relief system on environmental protection is lacking, the decision-making system is lagging behind at the government level, and the government and enterprises are not divided. In the fifth chapter, through the comparative analysis of the American neighborhood avoidance movement, we get the enlightenment to our government to deal with the neighbor avoidance movement. The sixth chapter combines the actual reasons of the neighboring avoidance movement in our country and the practical predicament of the two cases mentioned above, and puts forward the governance mode that the government should adopt to solve the problem of adjacent avoidance in the urban development: the network governance model. At the same time, it points out that the mechanism of interest compensation, the mechanism of legal remedy and the mechanism of cooperative governance are used to reduce the possibility of neighborhood avoidance turning into conflict avoidance. By establishing the principles of decision-making, scientific democracy and information disclosure, the public's neighbor-avoidance complex is reduced. The seventh chapter is the summary of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630
本文编号：2276573
[Abstract]:With the deepening of reform and opening up and the pace of modernization in China, the people's living standards are becoming higher and higher. In order to meet the spiritual and material needs of the people, the government needs to build a large number of public facilities. Some of these public facilities can bring people physical and mental pleasure, such as libraries, open swimming pools, but others let people avoid, such as funeral homes, incinerators and so on. Although it is well known that the government is building such facilities to serve the public, but because of some negative effects, such as the environmental pollution around housing and the depreciation of property values, etc. So every time the government builds such facilities, there is always opposition from the residents. This is the "neighborhood avoidance movement" that often occurs in our country in recent years. The phenomenon of neighborhood avoidance comes into being with the development of city. In recent years, more and more scholars and experts pay attention to it, and how to solve it is a great challenge to the government. There are seven chapters in this paper. The first chapter is an introduction to the current situation of the study of neighborhood avoidance movement at home and abroad by consulting relevant data and to show the research methods and routes as well as innovation and shortcomings of this paper. The second chapter through the literature analysis, on the basis of a large number of scholars at home and abroad on the basis of the study of the movement of neighborhood avoidance, the definition of adjacent avoidance movement, adjacent avoidance facilities and adjacent avoidance of conflict connotation. And the supporting theory: good governance theory and network governance theory are discussed. The third chapter analyzes the causes of the "new urbanization" construction in China: economic, policy and psychological reasons and its positive and negative effects. The fourth chapter is the core part of this paper, taking the project of Guodingshan garbage incinerator in Hanyang district and the construction project of government crematorium in Ligang town of Huazhou city as examples, the paper deeply discusses the value chain of benefits. The government should deal with the dilemma of the neighboring avoidance movement: the adjacent avoidance movement becomes the neighbor avoidance movement and the government passively succumbs to the construction of the adjacent avoidance facilities, and analyzes the causes: the lack of risk information, the self-interest purpose of the community organization, The cognitive factors of neighboring avoidance complex are preconceived, the legal relief system on environmental protection is lacking, the decision-making system is lagging behind at the government level, and the government and enterprises are not divided. In the fifth chapter, through the comparative analysis of the American neighborhood avoidance movement, we get the enlightenment to our government to deal with the neighbor avoidance movement. The sixth chapter combines the actual reasons of the neighboring avoidance movement in our country and the practical predicament of the two cases mentioned above, and puts forward the governance mode that the government should adopt to solve the problem of adjacent avoidance in the urban development: the network governance model. At the same time, it points out that the mechanism of interest compensation, the mechanism of legal remedy and the mechanism of cooperative governance are used to reduce the possibility of neighborhood avoidance turning into conflict avoidance. By establishing the principles of decision-making, scientific democracy and information disclosure, the public's neighbor-avoidance complex is reduced. The seventh chapter is the summary of this paper.
【学位授予单位】：华中师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 何艳玲;;“中国式”邻避冲突:基于事件的分析[J];开放时代;2009年12期
2 李小敏;;邻避事件引致地方政府公信力危机的成因分析及治理研究[J];企业家天地;2013年11期
3 王佃利;徐晴晴;;邻避冲突的属性分析与治理之道——基于邻避研究综述的分析[J];中国行政管理;2012年12期
4 刘小魏;姚德超;;新公民参与运动背景下地方政府公共决策的困境与挑战——兼论“邻避”情绪及其治理[J];武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2014年02期
，本文编号：2276573
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2276573.html
