邻避冲突的社会稳定风险研究
[Abstract]:According to international experience, in the process of modernization with industrialization and urbanization as the main symbol, because of the need to build a large number of industrial facilities and urban basic public service facilities, it is easy to break out many kinds of adjacent conflicts. In the rapid social transition period, China can not avoid this common international problem. The fact that China has entered the era of neighbor avoidance has been proved by the fact that the number and scale of these conflicts will increase in the coming period. Conflict avoidance is a conflict caused by the unfair distribution of adjacent facilities. The outbreak of neighborhood conflict will not only lead to the chaos of social order in a certain area, but also have an extremely adverse impact on the good order and harmonious development of the whole society. At the same time, we need to clearly realize that it is not that the risks of the adjacent facilities are too great to resolve, but that the public shows a sense of disapproval and anxiety about the attitude and behavior of the local government in the construction of the adjacent facilities. This has seriously affected the establishment of credibility and authority of local governments. Therefore, this paper explores the social stability risk of neighboring conflict avoidance, hoping that in a society where interests are constantly divided and risk distribution is more difficult to balance, we can manage the social stability risk of neighboring conflict avoidance society. Avoid conflict to the maximum extent and make the relationship between government and people more harmonious in the process of building adjacent facilities. This paper is divided into six chapters. The first chapter introduces the background and significance of the topic, combs and comments the domestic and foreign research literature on the risk of conflict avoidance and social stability, and introduces the research methods of this topic. The article points out the possible innovation and shortcomings. The second chapter defines the concept and theoretical basis, defines the two core concepts of adjacent facilities and conflict avoidance, social risk and social stability risk, defines the research object, taking the risk society theory as the background and the main analysis theory. On the basis of democratic consultation theory and good governance theory, the theoretical foundation of full text analysis is established. The third chapter points out the current situation of China stepping into a high-risk society through the analysis of the characteristics of China's social transformation. When it comes to the problem of adjacent avoidance, the numerous risks accumulated by "compressed" modernization have become an important inducement for the frequent occurrence of conflict avoidance in the immediate neighbourhood. These risks are manifested in the organized irresponsibility of environmental risks and the technological phobia caused by technological risks. The anxiety caused by people's excessive risk cognition and the crisis of local government trust under the cycle of risk-trust causality clearly explain the background of the generation of social stability risk in neighboring conflict avoidance society. The fourth and fifth chapters are the core chapters of this paper, respectively from the risk production, accumulation, diffusion, mutation and reproduction of these five aspects of the evolution of the risk of conflict avoidance social stability, and on the basis of the formation mechanism. Five types of social stability risk of adjacent conflict avoidance are put forward, including decision type social stability risk, fair social stability risk, interest appeal social stability risk, network rumor social stability risk and governance social stability risk. The sixth chapter puts forward the governance strategy of the social stability risk of avoiding conflict on the basis of the previous analysis, mainly from the two aspects of eliminating the risk of adjacent facilities and avoiding the risk of adjacent conflict, including the establishment of risk awareness. Some suggestions are put forward on how to respect and protect the rights and interests of the people, to establish the consultation system including citizen participation mechanism, information sharing mechanism, risk communication mechanism and so on, and to strengthen the service concept of local government to improve the responsiveness.
【学位授予单位】:南京大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘岩;;发展与风险:现代性的两歧——西方风险社会理论述析[J];北华大学学报(社会科学版);2010年04期
2 贾金玲;;转型期社会风险与当代中国社会政策选择[J];长白学刊;2008年06期
3 郭巍青;陈晓运;;风险社会的环境异议——以广州市民反对垃圾焚烧厂建设为例[J];公共行政评论;2011年01期
4 刘涛;杨琳瑜;;风险社会、虚拟社会管理与政府公信力建设[J];电子政务;2012年11期
5 谭爽;;邻避项目社会稳定风险的生成及防范——基于焦虑心理的视角[J];北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期
6 曹祖耀;秦春;;邻避设施及其社会稳定风险防范[J];中国工程咨询;2012年12期
7 冯周卓;黄震;;原生与次生:社会稳定风险的分类与治理[J];北京师范大学学报(社会科学版);2014年05期
8 王锋;胡象明;刘鹏;;焦虑情绪、风险认知与邻避冲突的实证研究——以北京垃圾填埋场为例[J];北京理工大学学报(社会科学版);2014年06期
9 张乐;童星;;事件、争论与权力:风险场域的运作逻辑[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2011年03期
10 冯必扬;;社会风险与风险社会关系探析[J];江苏行政学院学报;2008年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 本报记者 周雁凌 季英德 董若义;[N];中国环境报;2014年
2 本报见习记者 陈妍凌;[N];中国环境报;2015年
3 主讲人 南京大学政府管理学院教授 孔繁斌 本报记者 颜云霞 整理;[N];新华日报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 呼文敏;技术风险的社会根源及其规避对策[D];东北大学;2009年
2 王亚丽;风险社会中我国公共政策选择研究[D];南京师范大学;2013年
3 蔡园利;“风险社会”理论视域下政府职能转变问题研究[D];南京工业大学;2012年
4 梁玉婧;风险信息中的公正要素对权威信任的影响[D];辽宁师范大学;2013年
5 梁昀;基于利益相关者视角的政府重大决策社会风险评估研究[D];山西师范大学;2014年
6 李玉娟;利益相关者视角下邻避冲突解决机制研究[D];广东海洋大学;2014年
7 梁新;邻避冲突治理模式转换研究[D];南京大学;2014年
,本文编号:2387328
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2387328.html