风险社会与行政国家再造:一个行政学的阐释框架
发布时间：2019-06-20 04:57
【摘要】：通过对风险社会以及古典行政学相关理论的分析,同时结合发达国家风险治理的国际经验,本文认为风险社会所诱发的行政国家的适应性激变,对传统行政国家的三大基础提出了不同程度的冲击和挑战,推动了风险国家的形成。作为一种新的治理类型,风险国家在国家的角色职能、国家能力、制度范式以及行政文化等方面,都与传统行政国家存在着明显的差异。作为当今世界最大的发展中国家,中国社会面临着社会各类风险的叠加效应,同时中国的国家建设面临着建设现代行政国家和融入风险国家的双重任务。本文认为只有采用"1+1"的综合融入式建构策略,中国才能有效地应对不同风险的叠加挑战,并将风险治理有机地融入到国家治理能力和体系现代化的进程之中。
[Abstract]:Through the analysis of the relevant theories of risk society and classical administration, and combined with the international experience of risk management in developed countries, this paper holds that the adaptive upheaval of administrative countries induced by risk society puts forward different degrees of impact and challenges to the three foundations of traditional administrative countries, and promotes the formation of risk countries. As a new type of governance, there are obvious differences between risk countries and traditional administrative countries in the role and function of the state, national capacity, institutional paradigm and administrative culture. As the largest developing country in the world, Chinese society is facing the superposition effect of all kinds of social risks. At the same time, China's national construction is facing the dual task of building a modern administrative state and integrating into a risky country. This paper holds that only by adopting the comprehensive integration construction strategy of "11" can China effectively cope with the superposition challenge of different risks and integrate risk management into the process of national governance ability and system modernization organically.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“基于RIA分析框架下的中国食品安全监管体系评估及优化研究”(项目号:71573264) 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目(项目号:16XNA003)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D630
[Abstract]:Through the analysis of the relevant theories of risk society and classical administration, and combined with the international experience of risk management in developed countries, this paper holds that the adaptive upheaval of administrative countries induced by risk society puts forward different degrees of impact and challenges to the three foundations of traditional administrative countries, and promotes the formation of risk countries. As a new type of governance, there are obvious differences between risk countries and traditional administrative countries in the role and function of the state, national capacity, institutional paradigm and administrative culture. As the largest developing country in the world, Chinese society is facing the superposition effect of all kinds of social risks. At the same time, China's national construction is facing the dual task of building a modern administrative state and integrating into a risky country. This paper holds that only by adopting the comprehensive integration construction strategy of "11" can China effectively cope with the superposition challenge of different risks and integrate risk management into the process of national governance ability and system modernization organically.
【作者单位】： 中国人民大学公共管理学院;
【基金】：国家自然科学基金项目“基于RIA分析框架下的中国食品安全监管体系评估及优化研究”(项目号:71573264) 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目(项目号:16XNA003)的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D630
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 鄂t，
本文编号：2502953
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/guanlilunwen/zhengwuguanli/2502953.html
