刘勰文学发展观阐释研究
本文选题:《文心雕龙》 + 时序 ; 参考:《陕西理工大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:刘勰《文心雕龙》不仅是中国文论史上的高峰,在世界文论史上也有重要的地位和影响。文学与时代的关系,继承与革新的问题,是刘勰文学思想的重要内容。《文心雕龙》很多篇目都论及这一问题,本源论、创作论和批评论涉及到文学发展问题,文体论叙述各体文章的源流演变,是各体文章的发展史。刘勰文学发展思想集中而又系统地体现在《时序》和《通变》等篇。“时运交移,质文代变”,是刘勰对历代文学演变的总体描述,通过对文学发展史的梳理,论述历代文学是怎样演变的。“文变染乎世情,兴废系乎时序”,论述文学与社会的关系,指出文学发展的规律。刘勰指出文学发展要遵循一定的原则,感情真挚、内容真实和意义深刻是文学发展的思想标准,文风清新、文体简约和语言华美是文学发展的艺术标准。杜预“互举其义”是中国古典解释学的重要方法,这一方法包括“经传互证”与“文本内证”。“经传互证”是两个文本间互通有无,互为依据的解释;“文本内证”是在一个文本内互为补充,相互印证。《文心雕龙》很多内容都采用这一方法论述,本文也运用这一方法来阐释刘勰文学发展思想。西方阐释学循环理论,从施莱尔马赫“整体与部分”,到伽达默尔“时间距离”的意义等,对于我们深入领会刘勰文学发展观具有借鉴意义。伽达默尔将阐释看作现在与过去的对话,这种对话存在“个人视界”和“历史视界”,刘勰的文学发展思想也是文学阐释循环的结果,是“个人视界”与“历史视界”融合而形成的。本文第一章对刘勰文学发展观的主要内容和理论内涵作梳理;第二章以中国古典解释学“互举其义”的方法来剖析刘勰文学发展观,并以西方阐释学循环理论对刘勰思想作比较;第三章以中外阐释学理论为视角,观照刘勰文学发展思想,以突显刘勰文学发展观的理论价值。刘勰文学理论是中国传统文化的组成部分。以中国古典解释学为依据,以西方阐释学为参照,以逻辑自洽为原则,阐释刘勰文学发展观,是对中国古代文论魅力的再一次唤醒。挖掘刘勰文学理论的价值,对于当代文学创作和文学理论建设,增强文化自信具有重要的现实意义。
[Abstract]:Liu Xie's Wen Xin Diao long is not only the peak in the history of Chinese literary theory, but also has an important position and influence in the history of world literary theory. The relationship between literature and the times, the question of inheritance and innovation, is an important part of Liu Xie's literary thought. Many articles in Wen Xin Diao long deal with this issue. The theory of origin, creationism and criticism involve the development of literature. Stylistic theory narrates the origin and evolution of each style article, which is the history of each style article. Liu Xie's thoughts on literary development are concentrated and systematically embodied in time sequence and General change. It is Liu Xie's general description of the evolution of literature in the past dynasties. Through combing the history of literary development, the author discusses how the literature of each dynasty evolves. This paper discusses the relationship between literature and society and points out the law of literary development. Liu Xie pointed out that the development of literature should follow certain principles, such as sincere feelings, true content and profound meaning, which are the ideological standards of literary development, fresh style, simplicity of style and beauty of language are the artistic standards for the development of literature. Du Bei's "mutual reference of his meaning" is an important method of Chinese classical hermeneutics, which includes "transliteration of classics" and "textual evidence". "Meridian transmission and mutual proof" is the interpretation of the two texts based on each other, and the "textual evidence" complements and verifies each other in one text. Many parts of "Wen Xin Diao long" use this method to discuss. This article also uses this method to explain Liu Xie's literary development thought. The cycle theory of western hermeneutics, from "whole and part" to "time distance" of Gadamer, is of great significance for us to understand Liu Xie's view of literary development. Gadamer regards interpretation as a dialogue between the present and the past, which exists in the "personal horizon" and "historical horizon". Liu Xie's literary development thought is also the result of the cycle of literary interpretation. It is formed by the amalgamation of the personal horizon and the historical horizon. The first chapter combs the main contents and theoretical connotations of Liu Xie's literary development view, the second chapter analyzes Liu Xie's literary development view by the method of "mutual promotion of its meaning" in Chinese classical hermeneutics. The third chapter takes the Chinese and foreign hermeneutics theory as the angle of view to study Liu Xie's literary development thought, in order to highlight the theoretical value of Liu Xie's literary development view. Liu Xie's literary theory is an integral part of Chinese traditional culture. On the basis of Chinese classical hermeneutics, taking western hermeneutics as reference and logic self-consistency as principle, Liu Xie's literary development view is reawakened to the charm of ancient Chinese literary theory. Excavating the value of Liu Xie's literary theory is of great practical significance for contemporary literary creation and literary theory construction and strengthening cultural self-confidence.
【学位授予单位】:陕西理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I206.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谷鹏飞;;《文心雕龙》在美国汉学界的经典重构[J];文学评论;2016年06期
2 陈多友;冯斯我;;日本《文心雕龙》研究概述[J];广东外语外贸大学学报;2016年01期
3 韩经太;;论“名句”呈现“境界”——中国诗学阐释学重构的一种模型[J];甘肃社会科学;2016年01期
4 李春青;;“强制阐释”与理论的“有限合理性”[J];文学评论;2015年03期
5 李春青;;中国文化诗学的源流与走向[J];河北学刊;2011年01期
6 张慧敏;;从求“美政”之“偶”到丧俪之“骈”“文变染乎世情,兴废系乎时序”——刘勰《文心雕龙·时序》[J];中国文学研究;2010年02期
7 张宗刚;;《文心雕龙·通变》主旨再探[J];宜宾学院学报;2009年05期
8 王齐洲;;“君子谋道”:中国古代文学观念的主体意识——兼论中国早期知识分子的来历和特点[J];中山大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
9 伍长清;;试论《文心雕龙·时序》中统治者对文学发展的影响[J];新西部(下半月);2007年08期
10 马洁;;文变染乎世情 兴废系乎时序——《文心雕龙·时序》的文学史论认识[J];中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2007年02期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 韩经太;;守正出新:中华文化的诗性精神[N];中国社会科学报;2017年
2 邓新华;;发展中的中国文学解释学[N];文艺报;2006年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 佟永波;《文心雕龙》的文学史观及其接受研究[D];牡丹江师范学院;2014年
2 李优;《文心雕龙》文体论中的“通变”理论研究[D];湖北师范学院;2013年
3 曾广酬;刘勰的文学史论[D];复旦大学;2013年
4 王红霞;石家宜《文心雕龙系统观》辨要[D];内蒙古师范大学;2012年
5 丛丽丽;“通变”观与《文心雕龙》的创作论体系[D];山东大学;2009年
6 管继芬;刘勰“知音批评理论”研究[D];山东大学;2008年
,本文编号:2073745
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/2073745.html

