当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 古代文学论文 >

宋代前期理学家诗研究

发布时间:2018-12-13 23:10
【摘要】:“理学”是中国独有的概念,在阐释上一般有广义和狭义之分,根据任继愈先生的《中国哲学史》,广义上的理学是“我国特定时期公元十世纪到十九世纪中叶的哲学史断代的统称”包含了宋代以后封建历史的整个思想史。狭义的“理学”则指以周敦颐、邵雍、张载、程颢、程颐等学者通过自己的体悟,融合中国以往儒释道哲学,以“性”“道”“命”“器”等命题范畴为核心,以成就“内圣外王”之道为目的“新儒学”。它是儒学借鉴道家佛家思想形成的,是中国儒释道文化进一步合流的产物。宋代印刷术发达,书籍刊行量较前代大增,再加上朝野尚儒重文之风,故宋朝学术发达,诗文均有很大成就,不少理学家便跻身文坛,写了大量诗歌,而其诗歌创作也沾染理学,铺陈义理,于是便产生了“理学家诗”这一诗歌体裁。本文第一章介绍了宋代前期理学家的定义和创作群体概况,其创作诗人分别是宋初三先生孙复、石介、胡瑗及“北宋五子”——周敦颐、张载、邵雍、二程,还有虽理学贡献不大而诗歌创作不容忽视的陈襄。本文第二章列举了前期理学家诗的题材及主题,分别是咏怀述志类、赠答酬唱类、诗咏史叹今类、纪游写景类、以及其他题材,在介绍各个题材时分别列举其经常表现的主题。本文第三章分析了这一时期理学家诗的创作风貌,并将其归结到以下三点:在诗歌艺术上不事雕琢,诗不求工。呈现出古雅质朴的诗风,有意与古诗相靠拢;在创作手法上多议论,好说理;在诗歌旨趣上多以儒家教义为旨归,呈现出温柔敦厚的品格。本文第四章分析了宋代前期理学家诗的历史地位和影响,本文认为宋代前期理学家诗在中国哲理诗有着不可忽视的地位,与两晋玄言诗、隋唐佛理诗遥遥相对,开创了中国儒家哲理诗的先河。而其又对后来理学家诗的写作具有范式作用,包括对整个宋诗的说理性特点及雅好平淡的审美取向具有很大影响。
[Abstract]:"Neo-Confucianism" is a unique concept in China, which is generally divided into broad sense and narrow sense in interpretation. According to Ren Jiyu's History of Chinese philosophy, In a broad sense, Neo-Confucianism is a general term for the history of philosophy from the tenth century to the middle of the 19th century in the specific period of AD in China, including the whole ideological history of the feudal history after the Song Dynasty. "Neo-Confucianism" in the narrow sense refers to Zhou Dunyi, Shao Yong, Zhang Zai, Cheng Hao, Cheng Yi and other scholars through their own understanding, fusion of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism philosophy in the past in China, with "nature", "Tao", "fate" and "apparatus" as the core. "Neo-Confucianism" aims at the achievement of the "inner, holy and external kings". It is the result of the further integration of Confucianism, Buddhism and Taoism. In the Song Dynasty, the printing technique was developed, the number of books published was much higher than that of the previous dynasties, and in addition, the government and the opposition were still Confucianism and heavy literature. Therefore, the Song Dynasty had developed academically and had great achievements in poetry, so many Neo-Confucianism had entered the literary world and written a large number of poems. And his poetry creation is also tainted with Neo-Confucianism, spreading righteousness, so the poem of Neo-Confucianism came into being. The first chapter introduces the definition of the Neo-Confucianism and the general situation of the creation group in the early Song Dynasty. The poets are Sun Fu, Shi Jie, Hu Yuan and "five sons of the Northern Song Dynasty"-Zhou Dunyi, Zhang Zai, Shao Yong, Ercheng, respectively. There is also Chen Xiang, who has made little contribution to poetry and can not be ignored. The second chapter enumerates the themes and themes of the early Neo-Confucianism poems, respectively, which are the chronology of Huai, the type of reply and singing, the type of poetry singing history, the type of travel and writing scenery, and other themes, which are often shown in the introduction of each subject matter. The third chapter analyzes the style and features of the Neo-Confucianism poems in this period, and puts them down to the following three points: there is no carving in the art of poetry, and no work in poetry. It presents an elegant and simple style of poetry, deliberately close to the ancient poetry; more argumentation in the creative techniques, good reasoning; and the Confucian doctrine as the purport of poetry, showing a gentle and honest character. The fourth chapter analyzes the historical position and influence of the Neo-Confucianism poetry in the early Song Dynasty. The author thinks that the Neo-Confucianism poetry in the early Song Dynasty has an important position in the Chinese philosophical poetry, which is opposite to the metaphysical poems in the two Jin dynasties and the Buddhist poems in the Sui and Tang dynasties. Created the first Chinese Confucian philosophy poetry. And it also has the paradigm function to the later Neo-Confucianism poetry writing, including to the entire Song poetry said the rationality characteristic and the elegant good insipid esthetic orientation has the very big influence.
【学位授予单位】:宁夏大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:I207.22

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 金程宇;《〈全宋诗〉补》榷正[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2003年06期

2 黄新光;《全宋诗·黎廷瑞诗》点校献疑[J];南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年01期

3 过常职;《全宋诗·王之道诗》订误[J];巢湖学院学报;2005年01期

4 李裕民;对《全宋诗补榷正》的几点辨证[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年02期

5 周小山;;《补〈全宋诗〉沈遘诗六十四首》质疑[J];古籍整理研究学刊;2012年02期

6 宋建昃;一部稀见的抄本──《全宋诗话》[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2001年06期

7 王新霞;;《全宋诗·苏辙》考辨二则[J];名作欣赏;2006年20期

8 王三毛;;《全宋诗》作者重出考辨四则[J];图书馆杂志;2007年09期

9 杜学林;;宋代韩集注者王俦生平辨析——兼及《全宋诗·谢自然》一诗的两个问题[J];四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2013年06期

10 张炜;;《全宋文》误收徐铉铭文一篇考辨——兼正《全宋诗订补》误署作者一例[J];西南交通大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期

相关会议论文 前4条

1 陈洪;;玄学的诗化与诗的玄学化——关于玄言诗的发展、特征和价值的再认识[A];东方丛刊(2001年第1辑 总第三十五辑)[C];2001年

2 李建中;;玄学人格与东晋玄言诗[A];中国语言文学资料信息(1999.2)[C];1999年

3 卢斯飞;;浅谈朱熹的哲理诗[A];广西语言文学学会第九次学术年会交流论文集[C];2003年

4 胡大雷;;玄言诗中的佛陀之音——论支遁为玄言诗创制虚幻境界[A];东方丛刊(2004年第4辑 总第五十辑)[C];2004年

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 杨利青;中学生不妨写点哲理文章[N];光明日报;2008年

相关博士学位论文 前3条

1 杨合林;玄言诗研究[D];上海师范大学;2003年

2 李斯斌;玄言诗批评史研究[D];四川师范大学;2011年

3 董春春;尼古拉·扎博洛茨基自然哲理诗研究[D];北京外国语大学;2014年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 谢晓雪;叶茵诗歌研究[D];安徽大学;2016年

2 李孟霏;北宋六言诗研究[D];兰州大学;2011年

3 辛文;魏晋玄言诗研究[D];江南大学;2009年

4 周晓林;东晋玄言诗若干问题研究[D];武汉大学;2005年

5 刘俊凤;玄言诗研究[D];南京师范大学;2007年

6 赵微;魏晋玄言诗研究[D];扬州大学;2003年

7 翟琳;浅论玄言诗[D];山西大学;2004年

8 张迎春;魏晋玄言诗论[D];重庆工商大学;2012年

9 赵静;魏晋玄言诗中的“空白”问题研究[D];云南师范大学;2016年

10 杨伟鑫;简约与两晋诗风[D];福建师范大学;2016年



本文编号:2377422

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/gudaiwenxuelunwen/2377422.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户87815***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com