探索教育研究的生活世界——建制民族志的技术路线与哲学依据

发布时间：2018-05-10 05:30

本文选题：质性研究方法 + 建制民族志　；参考：《教育学术月刊》2014年01期

【摘要】：与以往对质性研究方法纯粹形而上或形而下的叙述不同,文章以田野调查为实例,阐释作为质性研究新视角的建制民族志在教育研究中的技术路线与哲学依据。建制民族志关注日常生活世界中行动者的活动和经验,考察社会生活是如何组织的;重视访谈、观察与文本在资料收集与分析中的价值,并提出"以文本为媒介的社会组织"的路径进行越地情境与在地情境的有效对话。就研究的质量检测而言,提出质性研究的有效性和推广性有其生态界限。对教育研究中生活世界的探索是一个开放、持续和沟通的过程,研究者应站在主体间性的立场,在隐性的社会事实中建构结构化,为没有走进田野的人提供理解与沟通的可能性,从而走向交往行为的理性。
[Abstract]:Different from the former research methods of quality, this paper takes field investigation as an example to explain the technical route and philosophical basis of the educational research of the organizational nationality as a new perspective of qualitative research. The ethnography focuses on the activities and experiences of the actors in the world of daily life, examines how social life is organized, and emphasizes the value of interviews, observations and texts in data collection and analysis. And put forward the path of "social organization with text as the medium" to carry on the effective dialogue between the situation in the place and the situation in the place. In terms of quality detection, it is suggested that the validity and generalization of qualitative research have their ecological limits. The exploration of the world of life in educational research is an open, continuous and communicating process. Researchers should take the position of intersubjectivity and construct structure in the hidden social facts. To provide the possibility of understanding and communication for those who do not enter the field, and thus to the rationality of communicative behavior.
【作者单位】：天津师范大学教育科学学院;
【基金】：2012年度北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(12JYA001) 2013年度教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“博士生培养模式的学科差异研究”(13YJC880061)
【分类号】：G40

【参考文献】