思想政治教育教学相长的边界自觉与协同思维——超越“主客体”与“双主体”之争

发布时间：2018-10-09 09:46

【摘要】：思想政治教育学不是纯粹哲学,而是一门实践科学,实践有效性是思想政治教育理论创新的宗旨。"主客体说"与"双主体说"的争鸣体现了创新思想政治教育话语体系的理论自觉。超越"主客体"与"双主体"之争,有待于从思想政治教育的整体性和有效性上寻找进路。教学相长的边界自觉是达成话语共识的内在前提,要求从整体性上明确"教育者"或"施教者"在"主客体说"中的政治前提和逻辑关系,肯定"教育者"在顶层设计和施教过程中的主导地位或引领作用。"双主体说"不是对"主客体说"的替代性的范式革新,而是作为一项未完成的"创新"承载着尚待建构的协同思维,意在理清"双主体说"的教育方式定位和作用范围,运用"主体—客体—主体"实践辩证法来增强思想政治教育的实效性。
[Abstract]:Ideological and political education is not a pure philosophy, but a practical science, practical effectiveness is the aim of ideological and political education theory innovation. " The contentions between the theory of subject and object and the theory of double subject embody the theoretical consciousness of the discourse system of innovative ideological and political education. To transcend the dispute between subject and object and double subject, we need to find the way from the integrity and effectiveness of ideological and political education. The self-awareness of the boundary between teaching and learning is the internal premise of reaching the consensus of discourse, which requires that the political premise and logical relationship of "educator" or "teacher" in "subject and object theory" should be made clear from a holistic point of view. Affirming the leading position or leading role of educators in the design and teaching process at the top level. " The "double subject theory" is not an alternative paradigm innovation to the "subject and object theory", but as an unfinished "innovation" bearing the cooperative thinking yet to be constructed, with a view to clarifying the orientation and scope of the educational mode of the "double subject theory". The practical dialectics of subject-object-subject is used to enhance the effectiveness of ideological and political education.
【作者单位】：西安交通大学马克思主义学院;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金特别资助项目“中国腐败治理体系的协同要素与主导机制研究”(2016T90936);中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“社会工程与腐败治理体系现代化研究”(2015M580864) 西安交通大学基础课程本科教学改革项目“‘马克思主义基本原理概论’课程‘中班授课与小班讨论’实践模式研究”(1502Z-36)
【分类号】：G410

【参考文献】