当前位置:主页 > 教育论文 > 初中教育论文 >

课程标准下高中生生物科学素养测评工具的研究

发布时间:2018-01-16 06:13

  本文关键词:课程标准下高中生生物科学素养测评工具的研究 出处:《南京师范大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


  更多相关文章: 高中生 生物科学素养 测评工具 SOLO分类理论


【摘要】:伴随着生物科学素养作为高中生物课程核心任务和基本理念中的关键词在课标中的反复提出,学生生物科学素养水平的提高成为近年来评价和衡量生物科学教育成效中目标达成度的重要关注点。然而由于生物科学素养内涵的丰富且复杂,造成针对其的测评相当困难。因此,构建科学有效测评生物科学素养水平工具的研究就显得十分有价值。本研究以完成高中生物必修课程学习的高中生为研究对象,将定性与定量的研究方法贯穿运用于论文始终,基于《高中生物课程标准》的具体目标内容尝试运用SOL0分类理论这一新的评价视角作为技术路线编制完成了以纸笔方式考查高中生生物科学素养水平的测评工具。该测评工具由两大部分内容构成,第一部分是生物科学素养测评指标体系,包括:①涵盖生物科学知识、能力及情感态度价值观三大维度具体评价范围的内容框架;该框架的建立为后续编制测评题目的内容选择提供了依据;②明确各级评价指标要素所占比例的权重框架,共涉及3项一级指标,11项二级指标,19项评价要点;第二部分为生物科学素养测评题目,包括针对知识及能力维度的测评试卷和情感态度价值观维度的调查五级量表。通过对上述题目的各项质量指标数据检验结果结合受测学生的访谈情况进行分析讨论,最终确定的测评试卷由25道题目组成(21道客观选择题、4道综合能力运用题),其中知识维度试题15道,能力维度试题10道;调查五级量表包含20道题目,涉及评价情感、态度、价值观三项二级指标维度的题目分别为6道、7道、7道。由此看出,实际编制的测评题目不仅信效度良好,而且在内容和分值分配上也均与建构的测评指标体系分布大致吻合,因此一定程度上相互印证了整个测评工具两部分研究成果的科学实用性。纵观整个高中生生物科学素养测评工具的设计过程,由于所依据的SOL0分类理论在科学素养测评领域的运用还尚处于探索阶段,因此本研究可借鉴的方法较少,测评研究路线也有待进一步完善和优化。
[Abstract]:Along with the biological science literacy as the core task and basic concept of high school biology curriculum key words in the curriculum standard repeatedly put forward. In recent years, the improvement of students' biological scientific literacy has become an important concern in evaluating and measuring the degree of achievement of the goal in biological science education. However, because of the rich and complex connotation of biological science literacy. It's very difficult to measure it. It is very valuable to construct a scientific and effective tool to evaluate the level of biological science literacy. This study takes senior high school students who have completed the required course of biology in senior high school as the research object. The qualitative and quantitative research methods are applied throughout the paper. Based on the target content of Senior Middle School Biology Curriculum Standard, this paper attempts to use the new evaluation angle of SOL0 classification theory as the technical route to complete the test of senior high school students' biological science literacy level by paper and pen. The evaluation tool consists of two parts. The first part is the evaluation index system of biological science literacy, including the content framework of the three dimensions of biological science knowledge, ability and emotional attitude values. The establishment of the framework provides a basis for the content selection of the evaluation topics. (2) defining the weight frame of the proportion of evaluation index elements at all levels, involving 3 first-grade indicators and 11 second-level indicators, including 19 evaluation points; The second part is the subject of biological science literacy evaluation. It includes a five-level scale on the dimensions of knowledge and ability and the dimensions of emotion, attitude and values. The results of each quality index data of the above topics are analyzed and analyzed with the interviews of the students. On. The final test paper consists of 25 questions, 21 objective multiple choice questions and 4 comprehensive ability application questions, including 15 knowledge dimension questions and 10 ability dimensions questions. The questionnaire consists of 20 subjects, involving the evaluation of emotion, attitude, and values of the three second-level dimensions of the subjects are 6, 7 and 7, from which we can see. Not only the reliability and validity of the test questions compiled in practice are good, but also the distribution of the content and the distribution of the score are roughly consistent with the distribution of the evaluation index system. Therefore, to a certain extent, the scientific practicability of the two parts of the evaluation tool is confirmed. Throughout the design process of the biological science literacy assessment tool for senior high school students. Because the application of the SOL0 classification theory in the field of scientific literacy evaluation is still in the exploratory stage, there are few methods that can be used for reference in this study, and the research route of evaluation and evaluation needs to be further improved and optimized.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G633.91

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前6条

1 吴有昌;;SOLO分类学对布卢姆分类学的突破[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2009年04期

2 冯全成;李韶山;;高三复习中培养学生生物科学素养的尝试[J];华南师范大学学报(自然科学版);2010年S1期

3 王可炜;梁皑莹;萧文斌;羊芳明;;中学教育从业人员科学素养测评研究[J];科技管理研究;2012年23期

4 邓可,刘恩山;美国对科学教科书中科学素养的评价及其启示[J];生物学通报;2005年06期

5 赖小琴;;PISA 2006中学生科学能力评价的分析及启示[J];教育测量与评价(理论版);2013年05期

6 严芳;吕萍;;试析PISA科学素养测评[J];外国中小学教育;2009年01期

相关硕士学位论文 前1条

1 赵会景;初中生生物科学素养评价指标体系的构建与验证[D];河北师范大学;2012年



本文编号:1431878

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/1431878.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f8d8d***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com