面向学习过程的多元化评价研究
发布时间:2018-04-03 12:03
本文选题:教学设计 切入点:评价 出处:《宁夏大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:《基础教育课程改革纲要(试行)》提出:“改变课程过分强调甄别和选拔的功能,发挥评价促进学生发展、教师提高和改进教学实践的功能,建立促进学生全面发展的体系。”教育进入信息化时代以来,教育所追求的最终目标发生了改变,从“学习知识”到“培养全面发展和能够进行终身学习的学习者”。在这样的目标引领下,教育评价由“面向结果”向“面向过程”转变。评价作为教学设计和教学活动的一个重要环节应该贯穿于整个学习过程之中。因此,评价不仅应该关注学生的考试成绩,而且要注重发展学生多方面的能力,了解学生在学习过程中的成长,帮助学生学会学习、学会生活。本研究在整理和分析文献的基础上,开发了设计面向学习过程的多元化评价框架,并将该框架应用于教学实践,对得到的反馈信息加以分析、总结,提出若干建议,期望为广大教师在教学中对学生进行面向学习过程的多元化评价提供理论指导和实践帮助。具体来说,本研究共由六部分构成:第一部分,主要阐述为何进行该问题的研究,本研究的研究目的及内容、研究方法及思路主要是什么,并且梳理了国内外关于过程性评价、多元化评价的相关研究现状。第二部分,主要是对教育评价、过程性评价、多元化评价的涵义、特征等内容进行综述,并且在解读文献的基础上确定本研究的理论基础,为研究的下一步开展奠定坚实的基础。第三部分,构建了一个面向学习过程的多元化评价框架。首先从教学目标、学习任务、学习活动三个方面论述了与面向学习过程的多元化评价的联系,然后对构建的评价框架进行阐述,并对该框架下的各个要素进行分析和说明。第四部分,对面向学习过程的多元化评价框架中的评价方法和工具这一要素进行了论述。主要是介绍了几种常用的评价方法、工具,以供教师在进行过程性评价和多元化评价时选择和使用。第五部分,将上述开发的面向学习过程的多元化评价框架以及介绍的几种常用的评价方法、工具运用到教学实践,通过实践获得反馈,发现问题、提出建议,为教师进行面向学习过程的多元化评价提供参考。第六部分,主要是对本研究进行总结,发现研究中存在的不足,并对后续研究进行展望。
[Abstract]:The "outline of basic education curriculum reform (Trial)" put forward: "to change the course of too much emphasis on screening and selection functions, play evaluation to promote the development of students, teachers improve teaching practice and enhance the function, promote the establishment of the education system." since entering the information age, changed the pursuit of the ultimate goal of education, from "learn" to "cultivate all-round development and to lifelong learning." in this goal under the guidance of changing education evaluation from "results oriented" to "process oriented" evaluation. As an important part of teaching design and teaching activities should be throughout the whole learning process. Therefore, not only the evaluation should pay attention to the students' test scores, and the ability to pay attention to the development of students, understanding students in the learning process of growth, help students learn how to learn, learn to live Live. In this study the collation and Analysis on the basis of the literature, the development of diversified evaluation design learning process oriented framework, the framework is applied to the teaching practice, summarizes the feedback information analysis, put forward some suggestions, hoping to provide theoretical guidance and practical help for the teachers to carry out diversified learning process oriented evaluation the students in the teaching. Specifically, this paper consists of six parts: the first part mainly expounds the reasons why the study of the problem, research purpose and content of this research, research methods and ideas and what if, and reviews the domestic and foreign about the process of evaluation, the related research status of diversified assessment. The second part that is mainly to the education evaluation, process evaluation, pluralistic evaluation of meaning, content and other characteristics are reviewed, and the theoretical basis is determined based on the interpretation of the literature on The foundation for the research development, the next step to lay a solid foundation. The third part, to build a diversified learning process oriented evaluation framework. Firstly, from the teaching objectives, learning tasks, and discusses the diversified learning process oriented evaluation with three aspects of learning activities, and to construct the evaluation framework described analyzed and explained and various elements of the framework. The fourth part discusses the opposite to the diversification of evaluation factor evaluation of the learning process in the framework of methods and tools. Mainly introduced several commonly used evaluation methods, tools for teachers' selection and use in the process of evaluation and evaluation when the fifth part evaluation of common methods of the development of the learning process oriented diversified evaluation framework and introduces the tool applied to teaching practice, through practice to obtain feedback, Finding problems and making recommendations to provide references for teachers to make diversified learning oriented learning process. The sixth part is the summary of this research, finding out the shortcomings in the research, and looking forward to the follow-up research.
【学位授予单位】:宁夏大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:G632.4
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 高凌飚;关于过程性评价的思考[J];课程.教材.教法;2004年10期
2 吴维宁;过程性评价的理念与方法[J];当代教育科学;2005年16期
3 黄梅;;教学设计的评价范畴及其有效性探析[J];教育探索;2008年07期
4 高凌飚,钟媚;过程性评价:概念、范围与实施[J];上海教育科研;2005年09期
5 窦福良;;新课改背景下的多元化评价原则初探[J];新课程研究(基础教育);2008年10期
6 丁念金;;学习过程评价的方法探讨[J];基础教育;2012年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 梁惠燕;过程性学习评价行动研究[D];华南师范大学;2004年
2 徐春华;量规在教学评价中的应用研究[D];华南师范大学;2005年
3 刘丽颖;基础教育改革中过程性评价平台的构建与完善[D];云南师范大学;2008年
4 任娟;发展性学业评价之多元评价主体的研究[D];西南大学;2012年
,本文编号:1705119
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/1705119.html