“人教版”初中物理教材与“浙教版”初中科学教材物理部分的比较研究
发布时间：2018-08-27 17:33
【摘要】：随着基础教育课程改革的全面推行,在新版《课程标准》(2011版)的指导下,教育部对初中《科学》教材、初中《物理》教材进行了同步的修改和完善,于2012年秋季学期正式推广使用。本研究选取在初中科学课改试验区中,使用范围较为广泛的“浙教版”初中《科学》教材的物理部分与“人教版”初中《物理》教材做为比较对象,旨在通过比较研究,促进两版教材的优势互补,推进物理教材的丰富和发展,为基础教育课程改革贡献一己之力。本研究,采用文献法、比较法,分析综合法等科学研究方法,在宏观上,对这两个不同版本的教材在课程标准、编排结构、栏目设置、图片设计、习题配置等方面进行比较分析,分析两版本教材的特色和不足,提出了教材编写上值得商榷的地方。在微观上,选取两版本教材中的案例,从“问题解决策略”的“策略准备、策略实施和策略运用”等角度进行比较研究,分析教材与《课标》的吻合度。通过比较研究,发现与“浙教版”相比,“人教版”教材的编写与新版《课程标准》的吻合度不高。在教材编写上值得商榷的地方是:1.“人教版”教材⑴以活动取代知识陈述的繁冗。⑵增加教材趣味性。⑶降低课后习题难度。⑷增加科学方法指导;2.“浙教版”科学教材物理部分⑴知识体系分散,不利于教学。⑵活动偏多,个别实验难度大。⑶缺乏知识与过程的统一。
[Abstract]:With the overall implementation of the curriculum reform of basic education, under the guidance of the new edition of Curriculum Standards (2011 Edition), the Ministry of Education has revised and perfected the junior high school "Science" textbooks and the junior high school "Physics" textbooks simultaneously. In the fall of 2012 semester officially promote the use. The purpose of this study is to compare the physics part of the "Zhejiang Education Edition" junior middle school "Science" textbook with the "Man Education Edition" junior middle school "physics" textbook in the experimental area of junior middle school science curriculum reform. Promote the complementary advantages of the two editions of teaching materials, promote the enrichment and development of physical teaching materials, contribute to the curriculum reform of basic education. In this study, scientific research methods, such as literature method, comparative method, comprehensive analysis method and so on, are adopted. On the macro level, the two different versions of textbooks are designed in curriculum standard, arrangement structure, column setting, picture design, etc. This paper makes a comparative analysis on the assignment of exercises, analyzes on the characteristics and shortcomings of the two versions of the textbooks, and puts forward some points for discussion on the compilation of the textbooks. On the micro level, this paper selects the case of the two versions of the textbook, and makes a comparative study from the angles of "strategy preparation, strategy implementation and strategy application" of "problem solving Strategy", and analyzes the consistency between the textbook and the Curriculum Standard. Through the comparative study, it is found that the compilation of the teaching material of the "Man Education Edition" is not in accord with the new edition of Curriculum Standard compared with the "Zhejiang Education Edition". The problem with the compilation of textbooks is that of 1: 1. "people's Education Edition" textbook 1 replaced by activities knowledge statement. 2. Increase the interest of the textbook. 3 reduce the difficulty of after-class exercises. 4 increase the scientific method of guidance. 2. The physical part 1 of the science teaching material of Zhejiang Education Edition is scattered, which is not conducive to teaching .2 activities, and individual experiments lack the unity of knowledge and process.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G633.7
本文编号：2207951
[Abstract]:With the overall implementation of the curriculum reform of basic education, under the guidance of the new edition of Curriculum Standards (2011 Edition), the Ministry of Education has revised and perfected the junior high school "Science" textbooks and the junior high school "Physics" textbooks simultaneously. In the fall of 2012 semester officially promote the use. The purpose of this study is to compare the physics part of the "Zhejiang Education Edition" junior middle school "Science" textbook with the "Man Education Edition" junior middle school "physics" textbook in the experimental area of junior middle school science curriculum reform. Promote the complementary advantages of the two editions of teaching materials, promote the enrichment and development of physical teaching materials, contribute to the curriculum reform of basic education. In this study, scientific research methods, such as literature method, comparative method, comprehensive analysis method and so on, are adopted. On the macro level, the two different versions of textbooks are designed in curriculum standard, arrangement structure, column setting, picture design, etc. This paper makes a comparative analysis on the assignment of exercises, analyzes on the characteristics and shortcomings of the two versions of the textbooks, and puts forward some points for discussion on the compilation of the textbooks. On the micro level, this paper selects the case of the two versions of the textbook, and makes a comparative study from the angles of "strategy preparation, strategy implementation and strategy application" of "problem solving Strategy", and analyzes the consistency between the textbook and the Curriculum Standard. Through the comparative study, it is found that the compilation of the teaching material of the "Man Education Edition" is not in accord with the new edition of Curriculum Standard compared with the "Zhejiang Education Edition". The problem with the compilation of textbooks is that of 1: 1. "people's Education Edition" textbook 1 replaced by activities knowledge statement. 2. Increase the interest of the textbook. 3 reduce the difficulty of after-class exercises. 4 increase the scientific method of guidance. 2. The physical part 1 of the science teaching material of Zhejiang Education Edition is scattered, which is not conducive to teaching .2 activities, and individual experiments lack the unity of knowledge and process.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：G633.7
【参考文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前2条
1 张继玲;武汉市初中科学课程实施现状分析与建议[D];华中师范大学;2008年
2 刘震飞;香港、新加坡和美国的中学物理教材研究[D];华东师范大学;2008年
，本文编号：2207951
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/chuzhongjiaoyu/2207951.html
