插话现象的性别差异研究及其对对外汉语教学的启示

发布时间：2018-05-18 03:43

本文选题：插话现象 + 性别差异　；参考：《东北师范大学》2010年硕士论文

【摘要】： 插话作为一种常见的言语现象,对它的研究有很重要的意义。本文通过社会调查,在采集、转写了自然环境中17段会话语料的基础上,对日常会话中插话现象的性别差异情况及其成因进行了数据统计分析,并与前人的研究成果进行了比较和对比分析。另外,本文也考察了成功插话的因素及成功插话语言策略的性别选择情况,旨在指导对外汉语教师将我们考察得来的规律应用于对外汉语教学实践,引导留学生熟悉汉语日常会话中话轮交替的语言因素和非言语行为因素,掌握成功抢接话轮的语言策略,最终能抢夺到发言权,顺利参与交谈,实现交际目的。根据本文的调查,我们认为:当今社会,在汉语日常会话中,女性比男性更爱插话。两种不同的插话形式,男女都更倾向于使用打断,且女性使用打断的频率远高出男性;男女使用重叠的频率都不高,但大体相当。异性之间插话现象较多,且女性的插话行为表现更活跃,更容易获得抢接话轮的成功;同性之间插话现象相对要少,男女表现趋同,但男性更容易以打断的方式获得抢接话轮的成功,且同性之间重叠并不是一种能很好地获得发言权的插话形式。另外,异性插话中,无论男女在成功插话后都更多地保持着一种积极合作的态度,大多数时候都愿意就对方感兴趣的话题继续展开交流,但转移话题时,往往是女性的行为表现更活跃;同性插话中,无论男女在成功打断后掌握话题控制权时都比较强势,而男性在成功重叠后基本上都会配合对方,继续原话题,合作态度很好。年龄、会话人之间的亲密度与插话现象的性别差异之间有关系,但职业、文化程度对插话现象的性别差异没有多大影响。这些插话现象性别差异的形成并不是某个单一因素作用的结果,而是由社会地位、心理、社会分工和文化角色、社会价值取向、交谈者之间的关系等多种因素交织在一起形成的。成功插话的因素有语言因素和非言语行为因素两类。成功插话的语言策略也有语音策略、词汇策略、语法策略、语用策略四类。
[Abstract]:As a common speech phenomenon, the study of interjection is of great significance. On the basis of collecting and writing 17 paragraphs of conversational data in the natural environment, this paper makes a statistical analysis of the gender differences and their causes of the phenomenon of interjection in daily conversation through social investigation. And compared with the previous research results and comparative analysis. In addition, this paper also examines the factors of successful interjection and the gender selection of successful interjection language strategies, with a view to guiding TCFL teachers to apply the laws we have investigated to teaching Chinese as a foreign language (TCFL). It can lead foreign students to be familiar with the language factors and non-verbal behavior factors in the daily Chinese conversation, and grasp the language strategy of successfully snatching the turn, so that they can finally seize the right to speak, participate in the conversation smoothly, and achieve the purpose of communication. According to the survey, we believe that in today's society, women are more likely to interject than men in daily Chinese conversation. In the two different interjections, both men and women tend to use interruptions, and the frequency of female interruptions is much higher than that of men; the frequency of overlap between men and women is not high, but roughly the same. The phenomenon of interjection between the opposite sex is more frequent, and the behavior of female interjection is more active, and it is easier to obtain the success of snatching the round; the phenomenon of interjection between the same sex is relatively few, and the behavior of men and women is similar. But men are more likely to cut off the wheel and overlap is not a good way to get a say. In addition, both men and women are more likely to maintain a positive cooperative attitude after successful interjections, most of the time willing to continue to communicate on topics of interest to each other, but when changing the topic, Women tend to be more active in behavior; in same-sex interruptions, both men and women are stronger when they control the topic after successful interruptions, while men basically cooperate with each other after successful overlap, continue the original topic, and have a good cooperative attitude. Age, conversational affinity and gender differences in interjection are related, but occupation and education have little effect on the gender differences. The formation of gender differences in these interjections is not the result of a single factor, but rather the result of social status, psychology, social division of labor, cultural roles, and social value orientation. Many factors, such as the relationship between the interlocutors, are intertwined. There are two kinds of factors of successful interjection: language factor and non-verbal behavior factor. There are four kinds of successful interjection strategies: phonetic strategy, lexical strategy, grammatical strategy and pragmatic strategy.
【学位授予单位】：东北师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：H195

【引证文献】