试析社会、高校、政府在高校创业教育中的主体功能——基于中美的比较分析

发布时间：2018-04-18 10:20

本文选题：中美高校 + 创业教育　；参考：《比较教育研究》2017年09期

【摘要】：创业教育的实践性必然要求社会、高校、政府三者成为其发展主体,发挥各自的主体功能,以科学的功能体系保障高校创业教育良性发展。通过对比中美高校创业教育的主体功能定位,发现美国"社会主导、高校主动、政府协调"的协同化模式使高校创业教育在上下联动、同频共振的合力推动下获得良性发展。中国高校创业教育呈现"政府主导、高校被动、社会旁观"的政府孤立主体主导特点,未能发挥高校、社会应有的主体功能,该特点使中国高校创业教育缺乏合力、功能效果不佳。借鉴美国经验,实现社会由"边缘旁观"向"核心引领"的效力提升、高校由"被动参与"向"主动推进"的功能优化、政府由"全面主导"向"宏观引导"的职能转变,应是未来我国高校创业教育主体功能定位的新选择。
[Abstract]:The practicality of entrepreneurship education must require the society, universities and governments to become the main body of their development, to give play to their respective main functions, and to ensure the benign development of entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities with a scientific functional system.By comparing the main functions of entrepreneurship education in Chinese and American universities, it is found that the cooperative mode of "social leading, university initiative and government coordination" in the United States makes the entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities develop well under the joint action of the upper and lower levels and the same frequency resonance.Entrepreneurship education in Chinese universities is characterized by "government leading, universities passive, society watching", the government isolates the main body and fails to give full play to the main body function of the university and the society, which makes the entrepreneurship education in Chinese universities lack the joint force.The function effect is not good.Drawing lessons from American experience, we can improve the effectiveness of society from "marginal onlookers" to "core guidance", optimize the function of colleges and universities from "passive participation" to "active advancement", and transform the function of government from "overall leading" to "macro guidance".It should be a new choice of the main function of entrepreneurship education in colleges and universities in the future.
【作者单位】：三峡大学高等教育研究所;
【分类号】：G647.38

【相似文献】