大学生对慕课教学与传统教学的体验感知差异——以优课联盟“积极心理学”课程为例

发布时间：2018-05-11 12:38

本文选题：慕课教学 + 传统教学　；参考：《开放教育研究》2017年04期

【摘要】：近年来,"慕课风暴"席卷世界高等教育,然而慕课教学是否会取代传统教学一直充满争议。本研究以优课联盟"积极心理学"慕课为例,采用问卷调查及访谈相结合的实证研究方法,在拉姆斯登的课程体验问卷基础上,编制适用于本研究的课程体验问卷,并对同一门课、相同教学内容且由同一教学团队实施的两种教学方式——慕课教学及传统教学开展了课程体验比较研究。结果表明:与传统教学相比,学生对慕课满意度高,大学生对慕课教学积极认可,参与过慕课学习的学生更倾向于选修慕课,认为慕课学习的选择面广、学习效率高、学习更自主。然而,大学生普遍认为慕课无法取代传统课程,认为慕课可能导致更多人混学分,且难以具有持续的学习动力与压力。虽然慕课有较高的报名率和优势,但仍然无法在短时间内取代传统课程,更适合作为传统课程的补充。本研究结果支持慕课与传统课程之间关系的"融合论"观点。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the storm of admiration has swept the world's higher education. This study takes the "positive psychology" course of the excellent course alliance as an example, adopts the empirical research method of combining questionnaire and interview, and based on the curriculum experience questionnaire of Ramsden, compiles the curriculum experience questionnaire suitable for this research. A comparative study was carried out on the two teaching methods of the same course, the same teaching content and the same teaching team, that is, the "Mu" course teaching and the traditional teaching. The results show that compared with the traditional teaching, the students are more satisfied with the courses, and the students who have taken part in the study of the courses are more inclined to take the courses, and think that the students have a wide range of choices and high learning efficiency, and the students who have taken part in the learning of the courses are more likely to take the courses. Learning is more autonomous. However, the college students generally think that the Moo course can not replace the traditional curriculum, and that the Mudu course may lead to more people mixed credit, and it is difficult to have continuous learning motivation and pressure. Although Moo courses have higher enrollment rate and advantages, they can not replace the traditional courses in a short time, and are more suitable to supplement the traditional courses. The results of this study support the "fusion theory" view of the relationship between Mu class and traditional curriculum.
【作者单位】：深圳大学心理与社会学院;
【基金】：2016年度广东省高等教育教学改革项目:“‘慕课’教学与传统教学的课程体验比较研究——以‘积极心理学’为例”(粤教高函2016236号)和“以审核评估为导向的大学生学习与发展研究”(粤教高函2016236号)
【分类号】：G434;G642

【参考文献】