大学生应对及认知灵活性与心理健康的关系
本文选题:大学生 切入点:心理健康 出处:《山东大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:大学时代作为个体人生中重要的转折阶段,在平时的生活学习中会面对很多类型的应激事件,应对作为应激与个体适应的重要中介元素,受到了广泛学者的关注,然而传统的有关应对的研究大多停留在应对策略与心理健康的关系研究,近年来有关应对灵活性的研究引起了研究者广泛的关注,不再仅仅局限于研究什么应对方式对身心健康有利,而同时考虑到了个体对情境可控性的认知评价是否灵活。此外作为社会认知的重要内容—归因,Fresco等认为应该重视个体在面对不同应激事件时归因方式的变化程度—归因灵活性,因此,我们试图探讨:1、应对灵活性与心理健康的关系2、归因方式及灵活性(社会认知)与应对灵活性及心理健康的关系3、认知灵活性(一般认知)与归因、应对灵活性及心理健康之间的关系。 研究一:大学生应对灵活性及归因与心理健康的关系 研究方法:采用方便取样,选取山东省某大学279名在读大学生,运用抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、正性负性情绪量表(PANAS)、乐观量表(LOT-R)、应对灵活性问卷(CFQ)及归因方式问卷(ASQ)对心理健康状况、应对灵活性及归因灵活性进行调查。通过独立样本t检验,比较男、女大学生在应对灵活性及归因方式问卷各维度得分上的差异情况;通过Pearson相关分析及多元逐步回归分析,分析应对灵活性与归因方式及灵活性之间,以及三者与心理健康之间的关系。 研究结果:1、不同性别大学生在应对灵活性各维度得分上不存在显著差异;在ASQ的正性事件普遍维度和负性事件的内外维度上以及归因灵活性得分上差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),男生得分均高于女生 2、大学生应对灵活性与心理健康存有一定的相关性;归因方式及其灵活性与应对灵活性及心理健康均相关。 研究二:大学生认知灵活性与心理健康的关系 研究方法:对从上述被试中随机挑选的106名学生进行威斯康星卡片分类测验及连线测验。通过独立样本t检验,比较男、女大学生在认知灵活性各维度得分上的差异情况;通过Pearson相关分析分别考察认知灵活性与归因、应对灵活性及心理健康之间的相关;通过多元逐步回归分析,考察认知、归因及应对灵活性与心理健康的关系。 研究结果:1、不同性别大学生威斯康星卡片分类测验及连线测验得分均不存在显著差异。2、大学生认知灵活性与归因方式及其灵活性相关。3、大学生认知灵活性与应对灵活性相关。4、大学生认知灵活性与心理健康水平相关。5、认知灵活性、归因灵活性及应对灵活性共同影响大学生的抑郁水平。 结论: 1、大学生对事件可控性感知的灵活性及应对有效性主观评估均与抑郁、焦虑及负性情绪呈显著负相关;与正性情绪及乐观度呈显著正相关。 2、负性事件内外维度及归因灵活性对心理健康各指标回归效应均显著,归因方式及其灵活性与应对灵活性各维度均相关。 3、认知灵活性与归因方式及其灵活性、应对灵活性、心理健康均相关,认知灵活性、应对效果主观评价及归因灵活性共同作用于抑郁,拥有较高的情境策略匹配度及归因灵活性的个体焦虑水平比较低,具有不良的归因方式的个体拥有较高的负性情绪。
[Abstract]:As an important turning point in the life of the individual college, in the usual life will face many types of stressful events, coping with stress as an important intermediary elements in individual adjustment, has attracted wide attention of scholars, but the research on coping with the traditional mostly stay in the study on the relationship between coping strategies and mental health in recent years. Study on coping flexibility has attracted widespread attention, is no longer confined to the study of what coping style on the physical and mental health benefits, while considering the situation of individual cognitive controllability evaluation is flexible. In addition as an important content of social cognitive attribution, Fresco think we should pay attention to individual attribution change degree method the attribution of flexibility in the face of different events so we try to investigate: 1, relationship between coping flexibility and mental health 2, attribution The relationship between mode and flexibility (Social Cognition) and coping flexibility and mental health. 3, cognitive flexibility (general cognition) and attribution, coping flexibility and mental health.
Study 1: the relationship between College Students' coping flexibility and attribution and mental health
Methods: using convenience sampling from a university in Shandong province 279 undergraduate college students, using self rating Depression Scale (SDS), self rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), positive and negative affect scale (PANAS), optimism scale (LOT-R), Coping Questionnaire (CFQ) and attribution questionnaire the way (ASQ) on mental health, coping flexibility and attribution flexibility were investigated through independent sample t test, comparison of male, female college students in the attribution style questionnaire and coping flexibility difference scores on the situation; through Pearson correlation analysis and multiple stepwise regression analysis, the analysis between attribution style and coping flexibility and flexibility. And the relationship between the three party and mental health.
Results: 1, students of different gender have no significant differences in the scores of coping flexibility; in the internal and external dimension of positive events ASQ common dimensions and negative events and attribution flexibility score differences were statistically significant (P0.05), the scores of boys were higher than girls
2, college students have a certain correlation with flexibility and mental health, and the attribution style and its flexibility are related to coping flexibility and mental health.
Study two: the relationship between cognitive flexibility and mental health of College Students
Research methods: the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and connection test subjects were randomly selected from the 106 students through independent sample t test, compared with male, female college students' differences in cognitive flexibility scores on cognitive flexibility; observation and attribution were admitted by the Pearson correlation analysis between mental health and coping flexibility correlation; multivariate stepwise regression analysis on cognition, attribution and coping flexibility and mental health.
Results: 1, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test and attachment to the gender difference of College Students' test scores are not significantly different.2, cognitive flexibility and attribution style of college students and the flexibility of.3, students' cognitive flexibility and coping flexibility.4, students' cognitive flexibility and mental health level of.5, cognitive flexibility, attribution flexibility and coping flexibility influence college students the level of depression.
Conclusion:
1, college students' subjective evaluation of perceived controllability and coping effectiveness was negatively correlated with depression, anxiety and negative emotions, and positively correlated with positive emotion and optimism.
2, the internal and external dimensions of negative events and attributional flexibility have significant regression effects on all indicators of mental health. Attributional style and flexibility are related to all dimensions of coping flexibility.
3, cognitive flexibility and attribution and flexibility, coping flexibility, mental health were related to cognitive flexibility, subjective evaluation and attribution flexibility with the effect of interaction on depression, situational strategies have high, low level of anxiety and attribution flexibility, negative emotion has good attribution way the individual has more.
【学位授予单位】:山东大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:B844.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张自伟;刘小玉;王岚;王学义;;医护人员心理健康状况及应对方式的调查分析[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2010年02期
2 赵云龙;赵建新;;人格、应对方式和心理健康的关系研究[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2011年06期
3 牛荣华;王冠军;刘冰;;高校大学生应对方式与心理健康的关系[J];中国健康心理学杂志;2011年08期
4 张德玄;郑莉君;李问;宋美荣;贾文斌;;认知灵活性与大学生心理健康的相关关系[J];中国学校卫生;2009年04期
5 桑标;陆洋;;高一学生应对灵活性及其影响因素的研究[J];心理科学;2006年05期
6 张雨新,王燕;归因方式和抑郁[J];心理学报;1989年02期
7 王登峰,甘怡群;对生活事件知觉的认知──知识系统模型[J];心理学报;1994年01期
8 王纯;张宁;;归因方式问卷的初步修订[J];中国行为医学科学;2006年05期
9 魏立莹,赵介城,巫善勤;抑郁与归因方式关系的研究[J];中国临床心理学杂志;1999年04期
10 李美华;沈德立;白学军;;中学生心理健康水平与认知灵活性关系研究[J];中国临床心理学杂志;2006年03期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 赵兵;大一新生认知灵活性与学校适应的关系研究[D];河北大学;2011年
2 李成齐;大学生归因方式及其与心理健康关系研究[D];华东师范大学;2004年
3 刘建鸿;大学新生应对灵活性类型的界定及其与入学适应关系的研究[D];华东师范大学;2005年
,本文编号:1721463
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/jiaoyugaigechuangxinlunwen/1721463.html