大学生领导力：结构及相关影响因素的路径分析

发布时间：2018-06-09 06:40

本文选题：大学生 + 领导力结构　；参考：《华东师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：领导力是社会科学中研究较多的课题之一,但由于缺乏系统整合的理论框架,西方领导力研究至今未形成一个被大家广为认可的理论体系。已有的领导力理论及研究成果主要是针对商业领袖、管理者、军官等成人样本,对于大学生这个特殊群体,其领导力包含哪些要素,应该如何培养,国内外还缺乏系统的研究。本研究在借鉴前人研究的基础上,运用问卷调查法收集数据,采用探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、方差分析、相关分析、多元线性回归分析等多种统计分析方法,对数据进行分析解释,建构并验证了大学生领导力结构模型。通过对长三角地区三所院校近900名大学生的测试,就我国大学生领导力结构及其相关因素进行了探讨。研究主要结果如下：一、通过探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析,构建了包含任务处理、关系处理和动机态度三个维度的大学生领导力结构模型。大学生领导力问卷的信度和效度均符合心理测量学的要求；二、人格维度中的宜人性A(p.001)、责任心C(p.001)、神经质N(p.05)和成就动机维度的追求成功(p.001)、回避失败(p.01)对领导力均有显著预测作用,其中宜人性A、责任心C、追求成功与领导力得分呈现显著正相关,而神经质N与领导力得分呈现显著负相关；三、担任学生干部的累计时间与责任心C(p.05)、追求成功(p.01)和回避失败p.01)三个维度得分均呈显著相关,其与责任心C、追求成功存在显著正相关,而与回避失败存在显著负相关；四、学业成就的两个指标——高考成绩和综合测评成绩对领导力得分没有显著的预测作用；五、领导力得分并不存在男女性别上的差异,同时也没有发现人格、成就动机、学业成就和领导力得分在专业、年级等因素上的差异。
[Abstract]:Leadership is one of the most widely studied topics in social sciences. However, due to the lack of systematic integration theory framework, the western leadership research has not formed a widely recognized theoretical system. The existing leadership theory and research results are mainly aimed at business leaders, managers, military officers and other adult samples, for this special group of college students, what elements of leadership should be developed, There is no systematic research at home and abroad. Based on the previous studies, this study uses questionnaire method to collect data, adopts exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, variance analysis, correlation analysis, etc. Multiple linear regression analysis and other statistical analysis methods are used to analyze and interpret the data and construct and verify the leadership structure model of college students. Based on the test of nearly 900 college students in three universities in the Yangtze River Delta, this paper discusses the leadership structure of Chinese college students and its related factors. The main results are as follows: firstly, through exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis, a leadership structure model of college students is constructed, which includes three dimensions: task processing, relationship processing and motivational attitude. The reliability and validity of the leadership questionnaire of college students met the requirements of psychometrics. Secondly, the personality dimensions, such as aptitude, responsibility, neuroticism, and achievement motivation, had a significant predictive effect on leadership, and the dimensions of achievement motivation, avoidance, failure and avoidance were significant predictors of leadership. Among them, A, C of sense of responsibility, pursuit of success and leadership score were positively correlated, while neurotic N was negatively correlated with leadership score. The accumulative time of student cadres was significantly correlated with the scores of responsibility, success, success and avoidance failure, which was positively correlated with responsibility C and success, but negatively correlated with avoidance failure. There was no significant predictive effect on leadership scores by the two indicators of academic achievement: college entrance examination results and comprehensive assessment results. Fifth, there was no gender difference in leadership scores, and no personality or achievement motivation was found. Differences in academic achievement and leadership scores in professional, grade and other factors.
【学位授予单位】：华东师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：B844.2

【参考文献】