我国大学院级学术委员会组织建设研究
本文选题:学术委员会 切入点:院级学术委员会 出处:《扬州大学》2012年硕士论文
【摘要】:中国近现代模式的高等教育始于19世纪末,连同“教授治校”、“学术自由”等思想一起从西方移植到我国。随着国家政策的变化,我国最终确定高校实行党委领导下的校长负责制,这使得高校在高度集权的行政力量主导下运行。大学学术委员会是“教授治校”和“学术自由”理念在我国高校的合法制度形态,院级学术委员会在组织建制上隶属于大学学术委员会,是大学学术委员会的基层组织。因此,不管是完善大学学术管理,还是深入了解高校学术活动情况,都应该注重院级学术委员会建设。本研究期望通过系统的调查,了解我国高校院级学术委员会的实际运行情况,从而完善学术委员会制度,科学学术管理,彰显高校学术权力。 本文回顾了我国大学院级学术委员会组织变迁的过程,列举了大学学术委员会制度发展过程中的主要国家政策,以及这些政策对学术委员会制度带来的影响。文章在对大学学术管理概念界定的基础上,理清大学学术委员会、院级学术委员会的内涵,指出高校院级学术委员会是大学学术委员会的基层机构,本质上是高校基层学术组织,是高校基层学术管理的重要组织形式。院级学术委员会建设能够促进高校基层学术管理,完善大学学术委员会制度,彰显高校学术权力。对学院学术委员会组织建设的研究基于组织管理理论和高等教育“组织的观点”。 作者对高校院级学术委员会成员组成、职能现状进行调查,发现学院学术委员会组织建设存在的问题:组织结构不科学、组织职能践行不够、成员权益意识薄弱等。忽略科学管理、缺乏“过程”意识、漠视人文关怀是院级学术委员会组织建设存在问题的理论根源。解决这些问题,主要从以下两方面着手:完善院级学术委员会运行机制,例如建立健全相关法律法规、科学运用组织管理理论;提升学术权力地位,明确学术权力的重要地位,实现学术权力与行政权力的制衡。
[Abstract]:Chinese modern higher education began at the end of the 19th century and was transplanted from the West to China along with the ideas of "Professor governing School" and "academic Freedom".With the change of national policy, our country has finally decided to implement the president responsibility system under the leadership of the Party committee, which makes colleges and universities run under the guidance of highly centralized administrative power.The academic committee of university is the legal system form of the concept of "managing the university by professor" and "academic freedom" in our country. The academic committee at the college level is subordinate to the academic committee of the university in the organizational system, and is the basic organization of the academic committee of the university.Therefore, whether it is to perfect the academic management of the university or to understand the academic activities in the university, we should pay attention to the construction of the academic committee at the college level.The purpose of this study is to understand the actual operation of academic committees of colleges and universities in China through systematic investigation, so as to perfect the system of academic committees, scientific academic management and highlight academic power of colleges and universities.This paper reviews the process of the organizational change of academic committees at the university level in China, and lists the main national policies in the development of the academic committee system in universities and the influence of these policies on the academic committee system.Based on the definition of the concept of university academic management, this paper clarifies the connotation of the academic committee and academic committee of the university, and points out that the academic committee at the college level is the grass-roots organization of the academic committee of the university.In essence, it is a basic academic organization in colleges and universities, and an important organization form of academic management at basic level in colleges and universities.The construction of academic committee at the college level can promote the academic management at the grass-roots level, perfect the system of the academic committee of the university, and highlight the academic power of the university.The research on the organization construction of academic committee of college is based on the theory of organization management and the viewpoint of organization in higher education.The author investigates the composition and function status of academic committee in colleges and universities, and finds out the problems existing in the organization construction of academic committee of college, such as unscientific organization structure, insufficient practice of organizational function, weak awareness of members' rights and interests, etc.Neglecting the scientific management, lacking the consciousness of "process" and ignoring the humanistic concern are the theoretical roots of the problems existing in the organizational construction of academic committees at the academic level.To solve these problems, we should start from the following two aspects: perfecting the operating mechanism of academic committees at the academic level, such as establishing and perfecting relevant laws and regulations, scientifically applying the theory of organization and management, promoting the status of academic power and clarifying the important position of academic power,To realize the balance between academic power and administrative power.
【学位授予单位】:扬州大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:G644.6;G647.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 郭卉;美国大学评议会制度研究——以斯坦福大学为例[J];比较教育研究;2005年03期
2 李友唐;谈庚子赔款和清华学堂[J];北京社会科学;1997年03期
3 胡仁东;;大学组织学术发展的动力机制探析[J];北京教育(高教版);2006年09期
4 陈何芳;;创新大学学术组织结构,提高大学学术生产力[J];高等工程教育研究;2005年06期
5 向东春;;大学基层学术组织的属性透视[J];高等工程教育研究;2006年03期
6 向东春;;大学学术人员在学术事务管理中影响力的实证研究[J];教师教育研究;2008年05期
7 李春梅,陈彬;大学学术管理组织的历史演进及其启示[J];高教探索;2005年01期
8 董云川;论大学行政权力的泛化[J];高等教育研究;2000年02期
9 陈磊;高等学校学术权力的反思与建构[J];高等教育研究;2002年04期
10 胡成功;高等学校基层学术组织现状与问题——全国231所高等学校问卷调查报告[J];高等教育研究;2003年06期
相关博士学位论文 前2条
1 季诚钧;大学组织属性与结构研究[D];华东师范大学;2004年
2 王志彦;中国大学学术组织结构与运行模式研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 陈何芳;中国大学基层学术组织改革研究[D];华中师范大学;2002年
2 李芬;国外大学学术组织理论的发展、比较及其启示[D];华中师范大学;2005年
3 牟宇;知识管理与大学学术组织变革[D];浙江师范大学;2006年
4 刘双云;中美研究型大学学术组织机构研究[D];上海交通大学;2007年
5 杨永革;我国高等学校学术组织研究[D];西安电子科技大学;2007年
6 黄镇;美国加州大学教授会研究[D];河南大学;2007年
,本文编号:1728214
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/suzhijiaoyulunwen/1728214.html