北京市三所学校初一学生预防性侵犯教育影响评价

发布时间：2018-04-19 19:24

本文选题：中学生 + 学校健康教育　；参考：《中国儿童保健杂志》2013年01期

【摘要】：【目的】评价学校预防性侵犯教育对初一年级学生知识和技能的影响,为在初中生中开展预防性侵犯教育和研究提供科学依据。【方法】采用方便取样。选取北京市3所学校初一年级学生作为研究对象。将学生以班级为单位分为教育组和对照组。由学校教师使用统一编写的教案,在学校对学生开展预防性侵犯教育。分别于教育前、教育后1周和教育后4个月对学生进行问卷调查,比较两组学生预防性侵犯知识和技能的差异。【结果】有关预防性侵犯知识和技能,教育前,教育组与对照组学生得分(知识2.17vs 2.21;技能1.97vs 1.97)比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05);教育后1周和教育后4个月,教育组学生知识和技能得分均明显高于对照组学生得分(教育后1周,知识:3.20vs2.35,技能:2.72vs 2.09;教育后4个月,知识:3.00vs 2.58,技能:2.58vs 2.20),差异有统计学意义(P0.01)。【结论】学校预防性侵犯教育,可有效地帮助初一年级学生学习预防性侵犯知识和技能。
[Abstract]:[Objective] to evaluate the influence of preventive education on the knowledge and skills of first grade students in school, and to provide scientific basis for carrying out preventive education and research in junior middle school students. [Methods] the first grade students in 3 schools in Beijing city were selected as the research images. And the control group. The school teachers used the unified teaching plan to carry out preventive education on the students in the school. Before the education, 1 weeks after the education and 4 months after the education, the students were investigated, and the differences between the two groups of students were compared with the knowledge and skills of preventive aggression. The scores of students in the education group and the control group (knowledge 2.17vs 2.21; skill 1.97vs 1.97) had no significant difference (P0.05); 1 weeks after education and 4 months after education, the scores of students' knowledge and skills in the education group were significantly higher than those of the control group (1 weeks after education, knowledge: 3.20vs2.35, skill: 2.72vs 2.09; 4 months after education, knowledge: 3.00vs) 2.58, skills: 2.58vs 2.20), the difference was statistically significant (P0.01). [Conclusion] school preventive education can effectively help junior grade students to learn preventive knowledge and skills.

【作者单位】：北京大学医学部公共卫生学院/儿童青少年卫生研究所;
【基金】：北京市教育科学“十一五”规划课题(AGA09094)
【分类号】：G479;G635.5

【共引文献】