高等学校基础设施:效用偏差评价与供给逻辑分析
发布时间:2018-02-02 22:49
本文关键词: 普通高校 基础设施 效用偏差 供给逻辑 出处:《教育与经济》2015年01期 论文类型:期刊论文
【摘要】:1999年开始的大学扩招进程中,普通高等学校面临"基础设施效用不彰"的问题。以学生类校舍的生均面积及其"标杆值"为基础,以各学生类校舍的"效用偏差"为分析对象,采用熵值法测算了八类校舍"效用偏差"的权重,评价了扩招以来各年度学生类校舍的效用总偏差。研究发现:八种学生类校舍的"效用偏差"可以区分为"保健型"指标、"激励型"指标和"中间型"指标三种类型;扩招以来的学生类校舍综合效用处于"不彰"甚至一定程度的"倒退"状态。研究结论是:第一,政府对普通高校基础设施缺乏有力的宏观调控;第二,普通高校打了一场后勤保障投入失当的"扩招之战"但面临提高学生类校舍综合效用的"重要机遇期";第三,普通高校具有实现组织利益最大化的倾向;第四,普通高校在基础设施供给方面体现了"赶牛式"行政的特征,且形成了一定程度的"投入惯性效应"。
[Abstract]:In 1999, in the process of university enrollment expansion, ordinary colleges and universities are faced with the problem of "inadequate utility of infrastructure", which is based on the average area of students' school premises and their "benchmark value". Taking the "utility deviation" of each student school building as the analysis object, the weight of the "utility deviation" of the eight kinds of school buildings is calculated by the entropy method. This paper evaluates the total utility deviation of the student school buildings in each year since the expansion of enrollment. The study finds that the "utility deviation" of the eight kinds of student schools can be divided into "health care type" indicators. "incentive type" index and "intermediate type" index three types; Since the expansion of enrollment, the comprehensive utility of student school buildings is in a state of "inefficiency" or even "retrogression" to a certain extent. The conclusions of the study are as follows: first, the government lacks strong macro-control over the infrastructure of ordinary colleges and universities; Second, colleges and universities have played a "war of expanding enrollment" with improper input of logistics support, but they are faced with the "important opportunity period" to improve the comprehensive utility of students' school buildings; Third, colleges and universities have the tendency to realize the maximization of organizational interests; In 4th, ordinary colleges and universities embodied the characteristics of "cattle herding" administration in infrastructure supply, and formed a certain degree of "input inertia effect".
【作者单位】: 兰州大学管理学院;
【基金】:国家自然科学基金重点项目“政府职能转变背景下绩效管理研究”(项目编号:71433005);国家自然科学基金面上项目“基于公共价值的政府绩效结构、生成机制及中国情境下的实证研究(项目编号:71373107)”
【分类号】:G40-054
【正文快照】: 1详情参见:高校扩招带来的问题极其严重[EB/OL].http://bbs1.people.com.cn/post/2/1/1/142272655.html/2014-10-01.2详情参见:高校扩招,大学生却蜗居旧校舍[EB/OL].http://gaokao.gaofen.com/article/133595.htm/2014-10-01.3详情参见:深大学生因校舍不足寄宿城中村上课要走
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 黄淑霞;;高校生均综合定额拨款模式探讨[J];财会通讯;2010年17期
2 尚虎平;;行将勃兴的“治理绩效管理”潮流——基于第三次明诺布鲁克会议的预测[J];公共管理学报;2010年01期
3 王富喜;毛爱华;李赫龙;贾明璐;;基于熵值法的山东省城镇化质量测度及空间差异分析[J];地理科学;2013年11期
4 陈文艺;高校教育资源浪费现象探析[J];华南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2005年01期
5 邹华;徐玢玢;杨朔;;基于熵值法的我国区域创新能力评价研究[J];科技管理研究;2013年23期
6 胡永宏;对TOPSIS法用于综合评价的改进[J];数学的实践与认识;2002年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 阳曦;张新全;王运琦;王赞;张耿;高洪文;于遵波;;高燕麦草苗期耐盐性鉴定及综合评价[J];安徽农业科学;2006年23期
2 王彬;傅贤治;张士康;;基于熵权TOPSIS模型的鲜活农产品供应商评价研究[J];安徽农业科学;2008年13期
3 董t熺,
本文编号:1485676
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jiaoyulunwen/xuekejiaoyulunwen/1485676.html