专利密集型产业、专利制度与经济增长

发布时间：2018-03-10 23:38

本文选题：专利密集型产业　切入点：专利保护强度　出处：《中国软科学》2017年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：本文利用专利案件数量与专利授权数量构建反映司法保护和行政保护的指标全面刻画我国的专利保护强度,借助模糊优选法从投入和产出两个维度设计指标筛选专利密集型产业,在此基础上对比分析中、美专利制度对产业经济增长的影响。本文提出并验证了如下假说:在经济发展水平临界点两侧,专利制度对专利密集型产业和非专利密集型产业的经济贡献度会发生逆转。经济发展水平低于临界点时,专利保护强度降低对非专利密集型产业经济贡献大于其对专利密集型产业的贡献;超过临界点时,专利保护强度提升对专利密集型产业经济贡献大于其对非专利密集型产业的贡献。中美产业层面数据的实证结果还表明,经济发展水平超过临界点后,专利保护强度的提升会提高专利制度对专利密集型产业经济贡献的弹性系数,而对非专利密集型产业经济发展贡献不显著甚至带来负增长效应,这也说明专利密集型产业不仅是数量密集,更重要的是制度依赖,同时,有必要在我国专利司法保护中探索引入产业政策杠杆。
[Abstract]:This paper uses the number of patent cases and the number of patent authorizations to construct an index reflecting judicial and administrative protection to characterize the intensity of patent protection in China. Based on the fuzzy optimization method, the patent intensive industries are selected from the input and output design indicators, and on the basis of the comparative analysis, This paper puts forward and verifies the following hypothesis: on both sides of the critical point of economic development, When the level of economic development is below the critical point, the degree of economic contribution of the patent system to both patent-intensive and non-patent-intensive industries will be reversed. The reduction of patent protection intensity contributes more to the economy of non-patent intensive industries than to patent intensive industries. The enhancement of patent protection intensity contributes more to the economy of patent intensive industries than to non-patent intensive industries. The empirical results of industrial level data from China and the United States also show that when the level of economic development exceeds the critical point, The enhancement of patent protection intensity will increase the elasticity coefficient of patent system contribution to the economy of patent intensive industry, while the contribution to the development of non-patent intensive industry will not be significant or even bring negative growth effect. This also shows that patent intensive industries are not only concentrated in quantity, but more important is institutional dependence. At the same time, it is necessary to explore the introduction of industrial policy leverage in the judicial protection of patent in China.
【作者单位】：南京理工大学知识产权学院;国家知识产权局专利管理司;
【基金】：国家知识产权局软科学课题(SS15-A-03)
【分类号】：G306

【相似文献】