所有制对高技术产业科技金融绩效的影响
发布时间:2018-06-18 03:35
本文选题:所有制 + 高技术产业 ; 参考:《宁波大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:高技术产业的发展代表了世界先进产业的发展方向,代表了21世纪世界经济的发展方向。高技术产业技术层次高、附加值高、市场潜力大、产业关联度高等优点被越来越多的人们所熟知,成为世界各国的战略必争点。众所周知,高技术产业的核心竞争力是技术创新。但由于技术创新过程高投入、高风险、收益期长的特征,使其成功不仅需要优质的科技资源,更需要一个高效、合理的外部支持体系。科技金融体系正好能满足这个需求,科技金融体系可以为高技术产业提供有力的外部支撑、可以为其提供差异化的服务、可以为其解除在研发创新过程中承担巨额亏损的后顾之忧。我国高技术产业的蓬勃发展几乎是伴随着社会主义所有制改革进行的,伴随着非公有制经济比重的大幅上升,期间涌现出了一大批实力雄厚的私营高技术企业,如联想、阿里巴巴、腾讯、华为等,然而本人经过数据整理后发现,实力雄厚的高技术企业大多是私营的,其中鲜有国营高技术企业的身影,那么我们不禁要产生疑问,国有高技术企业与私营高技术企业在科技金融绩效孰优孰劣?所有制在科技金融绩效中到底扮演一个怎么样的角色?所有制是通过何种方式影响科技金融绩效的?上述问题的剖析与解答,对于优化我国高技术产业所有制结构,提升高技术产业科技金融绩效有着至关重要的指导意义。本文以所有制为切入点,旨在探索所有制对高技术产业科技金融绩效的影响。理论分析方面,结合我国企业的所有制类型、我国高技术产业特征以及相关理论基础,阐述了所有制影响高技术产业科技金融绩效的作用机理,并在结尾提出了研究假设。实证研究方面,本文选择国有及国有控股高技术企业、私营高技术企业为研究对象,以高技术产业的5个子行业1995年至2008年的面板数据为样本,分别测度科技金融弹性、科技金融效率。结果表明:在国有及国有控股高技术企业中,科技金融对于技术创新的贡献不显著,科技金融效率较低,但利用效率逐年提升;私营高技术企业中,科技金融对于技术创新的贡献显著,科技金融效率较高,但利用效率波动较大。
[Abstract]:The development of high-tech industry represents the development direction of the world advanced industry and the development direction of the world economy in the 21st century. The advantages of high-tech industry, such as high level of technology, high added value, large market potential and high degree of industrial association, are more and more well known to people, and become the strategic points of all countries in the world. As we all know, the core competitiveness of high-tech industry is technological innovation. However, due to the characteristics of high investment, high risk and long profit period in the process of technological innovation, its success needs not only high quality scientific and technological resources, but also an efficient and reasonable external support system. The sci-tech financial system can meet this demand. The sci-tech financial system can provide strong external support for the high-tech industry and provide differentiated services for it. It can be lifted in the process of R & D innovation to bear a huge loss of worry. The vigorous development of China's high-tech industry has almost been accompanied by the reform of socialist ownership, accompanied by a large increase in the proportion of non-public ownership economy, during which a large number of powerful private high-tech enterprises, such as Lenovo, emerged. Alibaba, Tencent, Huawei, and so on. However, after data collation, I have found that most of the powerful high-tech enterprises are private, and few of them are state-owned high-tech enterprises, so we can't help but have a question. What is the better performance of state-owned high-tech enterprises and private high-tech enterprises in science and technology finance? What role does ownership play in the performance of science and technology finance? How does ownership affect the performance of science and technology finance? The analysis and solution of the above questions are of great significance to optimize the ownership structure of high-tech industry and to improve the performance of high-tech industry science and technology finance. This paper aims to explore the impact of ownership on the performance of high-tech industry science and technology finance. In terms of theoretical analysis, combined with the types of ownership of Chinese enterprises, the characteristics of high-tech industries in China and the relevant theoretical basis, this paper expounds the functional mechanism of ownership affecting the performance of high-tech industries in science and technology finance, and puts forward the research hypothesis at the end. In empirical research, this paper chooses state-owned and state-owned holding high-tech enterprises and private high-tech enterprises as research objects, and measures the elasticity of science and technology finance with panel data from 1995 to 2008 in five sub-industries of high-tech industries as samples. The efficiency of science and technology finance. The results show that the contribution of S & T finance to technological innovation is not significant in state-owned and state-controlled high-tech enterprises, and the efficiency of S & T finance is low, but the utilization efficiency is increasing year by year. The contribution of S & T finance to technological innovation is remarkable, the efficiency of S & T finance is high, but the utilization efficiency fluctuates greatly.
【学位授予单位】:宁波大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:F832.46;F271
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 吕炜;论风险投资机制的技术创新原理[J];经济研究;2002年02期
2 茹华所;尹豪;;云南省技术创新资本市场的发展对策研究[J];科技管理研究;2011年09期
3 王海燕;罗亚非;孙守霞;苏仁辉;曾慧;;通信设备、计算机及其它电子设备制造业R&D绩效分析[J];科研管理;2007年S1期
4 赵涛;张爱国;;基于因子分析的区域R&D绩效评价研究[J];西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版);2006年03期
5 杨晓冬;武永祥;;我国东、中部地区高技术产业创新绩效评价研究[J];科技进步与对策;2012年23期
6 丁文丽;基于最优规划模型的风险投资与技术创新关系的时间序列分析(英文])[J];云南民族大学学报(自然科学版);2004年01期
7 辜胜阻;洪群联;张翔;;论构建支持自主创新的多层次资本市场[J];中国软科学;2007年08期
,本文编号:2033872
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/chanyejingjilunwen/2033872.html