间接模式下农产品期货市场参与主体履约困境及对策研究
发布时间：2018-12-30 18:02
【摘要】：2017年中央一号文件明确提出要进行“农业供给侧结构性改革”。文件中要求我国要优化农产品产业结构,要进一步推进我国农业发展,以提高农业发展质量,增进农业发展效果。由于受地理环境、经济和文化因素的制约,我国农业发展具有天然的脆弱性,谷贱伤农的现象也时常上演。农产品期货市场的价格发现和套期保值功能可以保证农户的正常收入,充分利用农产品期货市场,可以有效帮助农户增收,优化调整种植结构,促进组织化生产。当前,农产品期货市场已经逐渐成为优化农业结构,提高农业现代化程度,保障农户增收的重要途径。研究如何充分有效的利用农产品期货市场,充分发挥农产品期货市场功能不仅有重要的理论意义,更具有一定的实际意义。当前,我国农户参与期货市场的主要方式为间接模式,即由农户加入合作社或者公司间接地参与到农产品期货市场中。参与主体间履约问题却成为交易双方主体间持续合作,农产品期货市场进一步发展的桎梏。对此,本文首先梳理了相关文献,对当前学者们对于农产品期货市场的功能作用、违约问题、风险管理的研究做了概括与总结。文章之后对核心概念和理论做出陈述,分析了两种典型的间接对接模式,在此基础上分析间接模式下农户和中介组织合作中存在的问题以及合作双方的履约问题,再根据以上分析找到在双方合作过程中履约困难的原因,与此同时借鉴了一些国外发达的经验,并根据我国的情况提出了一些对策以促进双方的履约,便于双方能够更好地参与期货市场,发挥期货市场服务三农的功能和效果。文章提出政府等相关机构方面可以提供促进参与双方的合作机制,提供良好保障,如转换对农户的补贴方式;建立“以丰补歉”基金等;对中介组织来说,一方面本文主张提高中介组织的持续经营能力,提倡农户入股参与期货市场等。另一方面,对于中介组织在期货市场的盈利模式可以采用“代理套保模式”,对于平仓量进行严格控制,以减小投机风险。通过上述方式,可以在一定程度上起到促进合作方履约的效果,提高双方参与农产品期货市场的积极性,实现农产品期货市场的功能。
[Abstract]:In 2017, the first document of the Central Committee clearly proposed to carry out structural reform on the supply side of agriculture. In order to improve the quality of agricultural development and improve the effect of agricultural development, it is required that China should optimize the industrial structure of agricultural products and further promote the development of agriculture in China. Because of the restriction of geographical environment, economy and culture, the agricultural development of our country has the natural vulnerability, and the phenomenon of untouchable injury to agriculture is often performed. The function of price discovery and hedging in the futures market of agricultural products can ensure the normal income of farmers, make full use of the futures market of agricultural products, can effectively help farmers to increase income, optimize and adjust the planting structure, and promote organized production. At present, the futures market of agricultural products has gradually become an important way to optimize the agricultural structure, improve the degree of agricultural modernization and ensure the increase of farmers' income. The research on how to make full use of the agricultural product futures market and give full play to the function of the agricultural product futures market not only has important theoretical significance, but also has certain practical significance. At present, the main way for farmers to participate in futures market is indirect mode, that is, farmers join cooperatives or companies participate indirectly in the futures market of agricultural products. However, the performance problem between the parties involved has become the shackle of the continuous cooperation between the parties and the further development of the agricultural product futures market. This paper firstly combs the relevant literature and summarizes the current research on the function of agricultural product futures market, default problem and risk management. After the article makes a statement to the core concepts and theories, analyzes two typical indirect docking modes, and then analyzes the problems existing in the cooperation between farmers and intermediary organizations under indirect mode and the implementation of the cooperation between them. On the basis of the above analysis, we find out the reasons for the difficulty of performing in the process of cooperation between the two sides. At the same time, we draw lessons from some developed experiences of foreign countries, and put forward some countermeasures according to the situation of our country in order to promote the performance of both sides. It is convenient for both sides to participate in futures market better and give full play to the function and effect of futures market in serving agriculture, countryside and farmers. The article points out that the government and other relevant institutions can provide a cooperative mechanism to promote the participation of both sides and provide good protection, such as changing the subsidy to farmers, establishing the fund of "replenishing and apologizing with abundance", and so on. For intermediary organizations, on the one hand, this paper advocates to improve the continuing management ability of intermediary organizations and encourage farmers to participate in futures market. On the other hand, for the profit model of intermediary organizations in the futures market, we can adopt the "agency hedging mode", and strictly control the amount of liquidation, in order to reduce the risk of speculation. Through the above methods, we can promote the performance of the partners to a certain extent, improve the enthusiasm of both sides to participate in the agricultural product futures market, and realize the function of the agricultural product futures market.
【学位授予单位】：天津商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F724.5
本文编号：2395936
[Abstract]:In 2017, the first document of the Central Committee clearly proposed to carry out structural reform on the supply side of agriculture. In order to improve the quality of agricultural development and improve the effect of agricultural development, it is required that China should optimize the industrial structure of agricultural products and further promote the development of agriculture in China. Because of the restriction of geographical environment, economy and culture, the agricultural development of our country has the natural vulnerability, and the phenomenon of untouchable injury to agriculture is often performed. The function of price discovery and hedging in the futures market of agricultural products can ensure the normal income of farmers, make full use of the futures market of agricultural products, can effectively help farmers to increase income, optimize and adjust the planting structure, and promote organized production. At present, the futures market of agricultural products has gradually become an important way to optimize the agricultural structure, improve the degree of agricultural modernization and ensure the increase of farmers' income. The research on how to make full use of the agricultural product futures market and give full play to the function of the agricultural product futures market not only has important theoretical significance, but also has certain practical significance. At present, the main way for farmers to participate in futures market is indirect mode, that is, farmers join cooperatives or companies participate indirectly in the futures market of agricultural products. However, the performance problem between the parties involved has become the shackle of the continuous cooperation between the parties and the further development of the agricultural product futures market. This paper firstly combs the relevant literature and summarizes the current research on the function of agricultural product futures market, default problem and risk management. After the article makes a statement to the core concepts and theories, analyzes two typical indirect docking modes, and then analyzes the problems existing in the cooperation between farmers and intermediary organizations under indirect mode and the implementation of the cooperation between them. On the basis of the above analysis, we find out the reasons for the difficulty of performing in the process of cooperation between the two sides. At the same time, we draw lessons from some developed experiences of foreign countries, and put forward some countermeasures according to the situation of our country in order to promote the performance of both sides. It is convenient for both sides to participate in futures market better and give full play to the function and effect of futures market in serving agriculture, countryside and farmers. The article points out that the government and other relevant institutions can provide a cooperative mechanism to promote the participation of both sides and provide good protection, such as changing the subsidy to farmers, establishing the fund of "replenishing and apologizing with abundance", and so on. For intermediary organizations, on the one hand, this paper advocates to improve the continuing management ability of intermediary organizations and encourage farmers to participate in futures market. On the other hand, for the profit model of intermediary organizations in the futures market, we can adopt the "agency hedging mode", and strictly control the amount of liquidation, in order to reduce the risk of speculation. Through the above methods, we can promote the performance of the partners to a certain extent, improve the enthusiasm of both sides to participate in the agricultural product futures market, and realize the function of the agricultural product futures market.
【学位授予单位】：天津商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：F724.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 孙静;;我国农产品期货市场存在的问题及对策研究[J];中国市场;2016年46期
2 王燕青;张秀青;冯凯慧;武拉平;;供给侧结构性改革背景下期货市场服务“三农”的探析[J];农业展望;2016年08期
3 苏玉峰;;中国农产品期货市场发展与问题研究[J];改革与战略;2016年03期
4 王文虎;万迪f ;吴祖光;张璐;;投资者结构、交易失衡与商品期货市场的价格发现效率[J];中国管理科学;2015年11期
5 林笑;;资本市场服务“三农”再出招[J];农经;2015年06期
6 刘舰;郭永智;陈晨;;开办农产品期货保证金存管业务[J];农业发展与金融;2015年02期
7 安毅;王军;;与《期货法》立法相关的若干重要问题探讨[J];证券市场导报;2015年01期
8 张兵;张蓓佳;;农产品金融化对玉米期货价格的影响[J];西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版);2014年04期
9 姜洋;;让期货市场更好地服务实体经济[J];中国金融;2014年10期
10 安毅;宫雨;;我国农产品期货市场投机特征与非理性行为[J];证券市场导报;2014年05期
，本文编号：2395936
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/guojimaoyilunwen/2395936.html
