建筑形态学视角下的多米诺体系的演化与变形
发布时间：2018-10-30 15:04
【摘要】：自建筑学和土木工程学出现专业分工以来,建筑工程设计通常表现出一种先建筑后结构的线性思维和单向流程特征。由于结构知识匮乏造成的误解与偏见成为了建筑形态塑造的约束与限制,同时,勉强服从于缺乏客观结构规则基本判断的建筑设计目标,会造成结构资源的巨大浪费,然而,建筑与结构并非没有互动的愿望,只是缺少一套可供交流的共同语言。在这种情况下,本文运用形态学研究方法,着重讨论了结构原型的演化与变形策略,明确了结构设计在建造整体目标中的重要位置,修正了长期以来建筑先入为主、结构被动配合的思维定势,实现了建筑形态与结构形态的有机整合,将改善既有结构原型自身弱点与拓展建筑形态多样性并举,建立建筑与结构两专业的沟通机制,有利于改变当今建筑与结构两专业在实践与研究领域的二分状态。本文首先从形态学视角明确了建筑形态与结构形态的含义,并对两者的众多关联性类型给予价值判断,进而通过对框架结构的演化历程的解析,从中归纳出结构原型的更迭机制。在此基础上,以当代应用最广范的多米诺体系为例,通过对诸多结构形态与建筑形态彼此合一并相互触发的案例进行解析与分类研究,从材料置换、几何变形和力流重构三方面阐述了通过结构原型的变形实现建筑与结构形态有机整合的设计方法。
[Abstract]:Since the emergence of specialized division of labor between architecture and civil engineering, architectural engineering design usually shows a linear thinking and one-way flow characteristics of first construction and later structure. The misunderstanding and prejudice caused by the lack of structural knowledge has become the constraint and limitation of architectural shape shaping. At the same time, the lack of basic judgment of objective structural rules will lead to a huge waste of structural resources. Architecture and structure are not without the desire to interact, but there is a lack of a common language to communicate. In this case, this paper mainly discusses the evolution and deformation strategy of the structure prototype by means of morphological research, clarifies the important position of the structure design in the whole construction goal, and corrects the long term preconceived construction. The thinking pattern of passive coordination of structure realizes the organic integration of architectural form and structural form, improves the weakness of the existing structural prototype and expands the diversity of architectural form, and establishes the communication mechanism between architecture and structure. It is helpful to change the dichotomy of architecture and structure in the field of practice and research. In this paper, the meaning of architectural form and structural form is clarified from the perspective of morphology, and the value judgment of many related types is given, and then the evolution of frame structure is analyzed. The mechanism of structural archetype change is concluded. On this basis, taking the domino system with the most extensive application in modern times as an example, through analyzing and classifying many cases in which the structural and architectural forms are one another and triggering each other, the replacement of materials is carried out. Geometric deformation and force-flow reconstruction are introduced to realize the organic integration of architecture and structure form through the deformation of structural prototype.
【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU201
[Abstract]:Since the emergence of specialized division of labor between architecture and civil engineering, architectural engineering design usually shows a linear thinking and one-way flow characteristics of first construction and later structure. The misunderstanding and prejudice caused by the lack of structural knowledge has become the constraint and limitation of architectural shape shaping. At the same time, the lack of basic judgment of objective structural rules will lead to a huge waste of structural resources. Architecture and structure are not without the desire to interact, but there is a lack of a common language to communicate. In this case, this paper mainly discusses the evolution and deformation strategy of the structure prototype by means of morphological research, clarifies the important position of the structure design in the whole construction goal, and corrects the long term preconceived construction. The thinking pattern of passive coordination of structure realizes the organic integration of architectural form and structural form, improves the weakness of the existing structural prototype and expands the diversity of architectural form, and establishes the communication mechanism between architecture and structure. It is helpful to change the dichotomy of architecture and structure in the field of practice and research. In this paper, the meaning of architectural form and structural form is clarified from the perspective of morphology, and the value judgment of many related types is given, and then the evolution of frame structure is analyzed. The mechanism of structural archetype change is concluded. On this basis, taking the domino system with the most extensive application in modern times as an example, through analyzing and classifying many cases in which the structural and architectural forms are one another and triggering each other, the replacement of materials is carried out. Geometric deformation and force-flow reconstruction are introduced to realize the organic integration of architecture and structure form through the deformation of structural prototype.
【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：TU201
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 李德锋;;浅谈建筑形态学对建筑设计的启示[J];山西建筑;2010年28期
2 林莆程;;建筑形态学与结构主义对建筑设计的启示[J];建材世界;2012年01期
3 韦s，
本文编号：2300336
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jianzhujingjilunwen/2300336.html
