市场中“马太效应”探析

发布时间：2018-04-04 16:09

本文选题：马太效应　切入点：消费者选择　出处：《重庆大学》2004年硕士论文

【摘要】：市场中的“马太效应”是现实生活中的一个常见现象，但是研究它的人却并不多。从能够查到的国内外资料来看，研究只侧重于市场结构的描述分析，对成因进行分析的文章几乎没有，本文第一次比较系统的对市场中“马太效应”进行了分析，主要分为三部分：第一部分：对市场中“马太效应”的定性描述，主要描述市场中“马太效应”的成因；第二部分：对市场中“马太效应”的模型分析，根据成因分析建立相应的模型；第三部分：对休闲服市场“马太效应”的实证分析，对模型实用意义进行试验检验。本文的主要结论集中在第2到4章：第2章从“马太效应”的描述文章中，提炼了四个产生市场中“马太效应”的原因，并给出了对市场中“马太效应”的参考定义，，给出了差异导致了“马太效应”，市场中资源配置差异、厂商经营能力差异、消费者选择差异与市场规则是导致市场中出现“马太效应”原因的结论。第3章构建了一特定偏好序细分市场的模型并给出了比较完整的解结构。证明要使细分市场中不出现“马太效应”的结果，必须满足商品对消费者来说不存在差异，这证明了“差异导致‘马太效应”’的结论，而且得出另外一个相关的结论：消费者选择上的无差异导致了多种资源消耗结构。第4章重点讨论了偏好序与市场结构及“马太效应”的关系。在模型的解结构中，得出了当某类商品市场中偏好序种数小于该市场中同类商品种数且不考虑收入约束或收入约束不明显时，必然会出现“马太效应”，部分商品的生产商会被淘汰出局的结论。这一个结论对“马太效应”的预测具有指导意义。
[Abstract]:The Matthew effect in the market is a common phenomenon in real life, but few people study it.From the domestic and foreign data we can find, the research only focuses on the description and analysis of the market structure, and there are few articles to analyze the cause of formation. For the first time, this paper makes a systematic analysis of the "Matthew effect" in the market.It is divided into three parts: the first part: the qualitative description of the "Matthew effect" in the market, the main description of the causes of the "Matthew effect" in the market, the second part: the model analysis of the "Matthew effect" in the market.The third part: the empirical analysis of "Matthew effect" in casual wear market, and test the practical significance of the model.The main conclusions of this paper focus on chapters 2 to 4:Chapter 2 abstracts four reasons of "Matthew effect" in the market from the description of "Matthew effect", and gives the reference definition of "Matthew effect" in the market, and shows that the difference leads to the "Matthew effect".Differences in resource allocation, firms' operating ability, consumer choice and market rules are the reasons for the "Matthew effect" in the market.In chapter 3, we construct a model of a particular preference order subdivision market and give a complete solution structure.To prove that the result of the "Matthew effect" does not appear in the market segment, we must satisfy the conclusion that there is no difference between the commodity and the consumer, which proves the conclusion that the difference leads to the "Matthew effect".Another relevant conclusion is that no difference in consumer choice leads to a variety of resource consumption structures.Chapter 4 focuses on the relationship between preference order, market structure and Matthew effect.In the solution structure of the model, it is concluded that when the number of preference order species in a commodity market is less than the number of similar commodity species in that market and no income constraints or income constraints are considered, the "Matthew effect" will inevitably occur.The conclusion that some producers of commodities have been eliminated.This conclusion is instructive for the prediction of Matthew effect.
【学位授予单位】：重庆大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2004
【分类号】：F014.3

【相似文献】