准市政公共产品民营化后的价格管制
发布时间:2018-04-12 10:58
本文选题:价格 + 政府规制 ; 参考:《国防科学技术大学》2004年硕士论文
【摘要】:各地政府在纷纷响应国家政策号召开放准市政公共行业市场的时候,对民营化最关键、最核心的问题——产品与服务的“定价”问题倍感困惑。准市政公共产品的公共特性要求实现公共利益最大化,最大程度得到消费者剩余,而民营企业为了实现利润最大化目标,必然凭借垄断地位制定垄断价格,从而损害了公众利益。由于这种行业特有的公共性和自然垄断性质,产品的价格无法靠市场实现自主调节,要求政府对价格给予管制。政府定价是否可以有效解决产品的公共特性定价要求与民营特性定价要求之间的矛盾呢?根据政府定价要遵循的原则,对准市政公共行业的自然垄断性质引出的垄断高价、无效率进入、价格歧视三个基本问题进行经济分析,得出政府价格管制可以有效解决这三个问题的结论。在实际应用中,具体的定价模式还应根据行业特点、发展阶段和市场供求均衡等具体情况来进行选择。定价模式基本确认后,结合中国目前的客观现状对政府产生价格的三种有效操作形式,听证会、事前竞价、事后介入进行分析,提出适合当前发展要求的操作形式,使准市政公共产品民营化定价理论在制度层面和操作层面上得以完善,最后,提出优化准市政公共产品民营化定价的条件。
[Abstract]:Local governments have in response to the national policies to open when the quasi municipal public sector market, the key to privatization, the core issue of the product and service "pricing" feel confused. Quasi public characteristic of municipal public product requirements to maximize the public interest, the maximum degree of consumer surplus, and private enterprises in order to to achieve the profit maximization goal, inevitable with a monopoly to develop a monopoly price, to the detriment of the public interest. Due to the industry characteristic of the public and the nature of natural monopoly, the price of the product can not rely on the market to achieve independent regulation, asking the government to give control to the price. The government pricing can effectively solve the pricing requirements of public product characteristics and contradictions private property pricing between? According to government pricing principles to be followed, at the municipal public sector natural monopoly nature guide The monopoly price, no price discrimination efficiency into three basic issues of economic analysis, the government price control can effectively solve these three conclusions. In practical application, the pricing mode should be based on the characteristics of the industry, to choose the development stage and the market equilibrium of supply and demand situation. The basic pricing model after that, combined with the current status of the Chinese objective produces three kinds of effective operation in the form of price, government hearings, before bidding, post intervention analysis, put forward to suit the requirements of the development of the form of the quasi privatization of municipal public goods pricing theory to improve on system and operation finally, put forward the optimization of quasi municipal the privatization of public product pricing conditions.
【学位授予单位】:国防科学技术大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2004
【分类号】:F062.6
【引证文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 杨风华;;对我国城市公共体育场馆服务民营化改革的认识[J];首都体育学院学报;2008年05期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 杨风华;公共体育场馆服务的有效供给[D];北京体育大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 薛裴;公共物品供给的民营化研究[D];首都经济贸易大学;2006年
2 刘东峰;我国公共体育场馆运营模式的初步研究[D];武汉体育学院;2008年
3 杨俊萍;基于系统观的PPP项目定价机制研究[D];重庆大学;2012年
4 刘震涛;梅州市水务市场化中政府监管问题研究[D];华南理工大学;2013年
,本文编号:1739446
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/1739446.html