《资本论》史书工作意蕴再解析——中国语境与中国运用
发布时间：2018-10-12 12:08
【摘要】：《资本论》逻辑的始源规定是"史",从而和"中华史书"工作方法及逻辑内在契合。以此把握《资本论》史的结构,可整体显露"事的科学"的性质,即"专业史"和"总史"的事的统一,以及相应地以"批判"为内置工作结构的历史与逻辑的统一。其整体要求将政治经济学批判作为"学科方法"看待,以历史—思维—语言的体式具体把握学科发展逻辑,从中升华出"逻辑科学"。该结构克服了科学主义弊端,并通过经济学范畴构造,成功运用了黑格尔逻辑学,同时由于根本采用"条目体"的工作领衔体制,又能够控制纯逻辑的漫无边际。以此审视《资本论》的"中国之用",则借鉴意义完全聚焦于"副标题"之上,亦即在于体现中华经济形态史与"政治经济学批判"的结合,以促成研究上的"中华资本论"向"原创意义的中国经济学"的创造性转化。它的实质意蕴在于书写"中国人资格"的经济思维方法,通过阐明中国历史文化语境之"批判逻辑",实现"重新研究全部历史"之导向的时代感召要求。
[Abstract]:The origin of logic is "history", which agrees with the working method and logic of Chinese History Book. In order to grasp the structure of the history of Capital, the nature of "science of events" can be revealed as a whole, that is, the unity of "professional history" and "general history", and the unity of history and logic with "criticism" as the built-in working structure. Its whole request regards the criticism of political economy as a "subject method", grasps the discipline development logic concretely in the style of history, thought and language, and sublimates "logic science" from it. The structure overcomes the disadvantages of scientism, and uses Hegel's logic successfully through the structure of economics category. At the same time, it can control the boundlessness of pure logic because of the basic work leading system of "item body". In order to examine the use of China in Capital, the significance of reference is completely focused on the subtitle, that is to say, it embodies the combination of the history of Chinese economic formation and the critique of political economy. In order to promote the creative transformation from "Chinese Capital" to "Chinese Economics of original meaning". Its essential implication lies in writing the economic thinking method of "Chinese qualification", and realizing the request of "re-studying the whole history" through expounding the "critical logic" of Chinese historical and cultural context.
【作者单位】： 江西财经大学经济学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“《资本论》与中国经济学实践创新研究”(15YJA790073)
【分类号】：F091.91
本文编号：2266051
[Abstract]:The origin of logic is "history", which agrees with the working method and logic of Chinese History Book. In order to grasp the structure of the history of Capital, the nature of "science of events" can be revealed as a whole, that is, the unity of "professional history" and "general history", and the unity of history and logic with "criticism" as the built-in working structure. Its whole request regards the criticism of political economy as a "subject method", grasps the discipline development logic concretely in the style of history, thought and language, and sublimates "logic science" from it. The structure overcomes the disadvantages of scientism, and uses Hegel's logic successfully through the structure of economics category. At the same time, it can control the boundlessness of pure logic because of the basic work leading system of "item body". In order to examine the use of China in Capital, the significance of reference is completely focused on the subtitle, that is to say, it embodies the combination of the history of Chinese economic formation and the critique of political economy. In order to promote the creative transformation from "Chinese Capital" to "Chinese Economics of original meaning". Its essential implication lies in writing the economic thinking method of "Chinese qualification", and realizing the request of "re-studying the whole history" through expounding the "critical logic" of Chinese historical and cultural context.
【作者单位】： 江西财经大学经济学院;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“《资本论》与中国经济学实践创新研究”(15YJA790073)
【分类号】：F091.91
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 刘文海;论技术的本质特征[J];哲学动态;1994年08期
2 王晓超;可持续的建筑和建造:事实与数字[J];产业与环境(中文版);2004年Z1期
3 郭玉洁;;浅析交叉与跨学科方法对科学技术发展的影响[J];考试周刊;2014年49期
4 陈燮君;;论分析与综合的系统化发展[J];上海社会科学院学术季刊;1992年01期
5 ;[J];;年期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 石培基;;地理科学方法论初步探讨[A];中国地理学会2007年学术年会论文摘要集[C];2007年
2 蔡晋安;钱家栋;赵家骝;席继楼;黄伟;;地震地电方法调研、模拟、试验与标准编制[A];中国地震学会地震电磁学专业委员会、中国地震学会空间对地观测专业委员会2010年会暨学术研讨会会议摘要[C];2010年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 田保华;推进有“灵魂”的教学[N];中国教师报;2011年
，本文编号：2266051
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2266051.html
