当前位置:主页 > 经济论文 > 经济理论论文 >

关于《资本论》第一卷研究起点的争论:简单商品生产还是简单商品流通

发布时间:2018-10-17 12:17
【摘要】:20世纪70年代,苏联学术界针对《资本论》第1卷的研究起点问题,发生了一场争论。以切森为代表的一方认为,马克思《资本论》第1卷的研究起点是"简单商品生产";而以施克列多夫为代表的一方则认为,《资本论》第1卷的研究起点不是"简单商品生产",而是"简单商品流通"。通过对比马克思和恩格斯本人对此问题的相关论述,可以发现,恩格斯首先提出了"简单商品生产"的概念,并认为它是《资本论》第1卷的研究起点。而在马克思那里,《资本论》第1卷的起点,是较低级抽象阶段上的简单商品流通。由于MEGA~2第2部分的出版,对这个问题的深入探讨有了新的文本基础。人们将会在这个基础上继续深入地讨论和研究《资本论》第1卷的研究起点问题。
[Abstract]:In the 1970s, there was a debate in Soviet academic circles about the starting point of the first volume of Capital. The side represented by Cheson believes that The research starting point of volume 1 of Marx's "Capital" is "simple commodity production", while the party represented by Schroedorf thinks that the research starting point of volume 1 of "Capital" is not "simple commodity production", but "simple commodity circulation". By comparing Marx's and Engels' exposition on this issue, it is found that Engels first put forward the concept of "simple commodity production" and considered it as the starting point of the first volume of Capital. In Marx, the starting point of the first volume of Capital is the simple commodity circulation in the lower abstract stage. Due to the publication of part 2 of MEGA~2, there is a new text basis for further discussion of this problem. On this basis, people will continue to discuss and study the starting point of volume 1 of Capital in depth.
【作者单位】: 德国柏林《马克思恩格斯全集》历史考证版编辑促进协会;中央编译局马列部;
【分类号】:F014.3;F091.91


本文编号:2276629

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/jingjililun/2276629.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户7a34a***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com