发展中国家在国际气候谈判中的地位与策略研究——基于新制度经济学与公共选择理论的视角

发布时间：2018-02-23 23:44

本文关键词： 国际气候谈判规则发展中国家集体行动　出处：《工业技术经济》2012年08期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：气候变暖的生态环境危机是关系到全人类生存与发展之共同利益的全球性问题。面对日益严峻的全球气候变暖的紧张形势,发达国家与发展中国家应在国际气候谈判的平台上搁置争议、通力合作,实现全球气候的共同治理与保护。然而在国际气候谈判中,不同国家在本国经济发展与全球气候保护问题上均有各自的利益诉求。在各国为自身谋求更多的排放权与发展空间的过程中,作为发展中国家的各国寄希望于在国际气候谈判中通过集体行动增进共同利益,然而由于发展中国家集团内部就减排与发展问题的利益冲突,特别是"搭便车"行为的普遍存在,致使发展中国家在与发达国家集团的气候谈判博弈中难以形成"合力"。本文旨在透过新制度经济学与公共选择理论的视角,就如何切实保护发展中国家在全球气候治理与本国经济发展中的权益问题,从国际气候谈判规则的改革与重构,以及发展中国家在国际气候谈判中应当坚持的原则这两个方面,给出一个合理的解释与建议。
[Abstract]:The ecological and environmental crisis of climate warming is a global problem related to the common interests of the survival and development of all mankind. Developed and developing countries should put aside their disputes on the platform of international climate negotiations and work together to achieve common governance and protection of the global climate. Different countries have their own interests on the issues of economic development and global climate protection. In the process of seeking more emission rights and development space for themselves, Countries, as developing countries, have placed their hopes on promoting common interests through collective action in international climate negotiations, however, due to conflicts of interest within the group of developing countries on emission reduction and development, In particular, the widespread existence of "hitchhiking" makes it difficult for developing countries to form a "resultant force" in the climate negotiation game with the group of developed countries. The purpose of this paper is to use the perspective of the new institutional economics and the theory of public choice. On the question of how to effectively protect the rights and interests of developing countries in global climate governance and their own economic development, from the two aspects of the reform and restructuring of the rules of international climate negotiations and the principles that developing countries should uphold in international climate negotiations, Give a reasonable explanation and suggestion.
【作者单位】：吉林大学;
【基金】：国家社科基金重点项目(批准编号:11AZD100)
【分类号】：X321;F091.349

【参考文献】