资本主义经济危机相关理论若干学派评析

发布时间：2018-03-04 21:34

本文选题：边际效用学派　切入点：凯恩斯学派　出处：《经济学动态》2014年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：自边际效用学派建立西方经济学新古典主流范式以来,总要遇到在这个主流范式限定的经济学范围内无法解释的资本主义经济危机问题。目前,西方经济学主流学派仍然只用市场交易定义资本主义经济,用主观价值论和理性经济人假说回避生产过程和生产关系对流通过程和交换关系的决定作用,这也就阻碍了它们对资本主义经济危机相关问题的政治经济学分析。凯恩斯学派在宏观经济层面打破了边际效用学派的一些假设,提出了一些有助于在短期内缓解资本主义经济危机的对策。但当它提出的对策遭遇通货膨胀和经济停滞等问题的长期困扰以后,它的理论像反凯恩斯学派或称新自由主义学派的各种理论一样走进了死胡同,因为它也像它的那些论辩对手一样,回避了对如何解决资本主义生产方式基本矛盾的探讨。
[Abstract]:Since the marginal Utility School established the neo-classical mainstream paradigm of western economics, it has always encountered the problem of the capitalist economic crisis which cannot be explained within the scope of economics limited by this mainstream paradigm. The mainstream school of western economics still uses market transaction to define capitalist economy, and uses subjective value theory and rational economic man hypothesis to avoid the decisive effect of production process and production relations on circulation process and exchange relationship. This has hampered their political and economic analysis of issues related to the capitalist economic crisis. The Keynesians have broken some of the assumptions of the marginal utility school at the macroeconomic level. Put forward some countermeasures that will help alleviate the capitalist economic crisis in the short term. But when it comes up against the problems of inflation and economic stagnation for a long time, Its theory, like various anti-Keynesian or neoliberal theories, has come to a dead end because, like its opponents, it has shunned the discussion of how to solve the fundamental contradictions of capitalist production.
【作者单位】：中国社会科学院经济研究所;
【基金】：中国社会科学院经济研究所创新工程项目“经济危机相关理论及其历史作用研究” 中国社会科学院经济研究所重点课题“资本主义经济危机理论研究” 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目“《资本论》及其手稿再研究”(项目批准号:11JZD004)的研究成果
【分类号】：F039;F091

【参考文献】