对新密李家沟遗址的几点认识

发布时间：2018-04-03 17:23

本文选题：李家沟遗址　切入点：优质燧石　出处：《中原文物》2013年05期

【摘要】：新密李家沟遗址是一处距今10500年至8600年左右连续的史前文化堆积,它的发掘为学术界深入研究中原地区旧石器时代向新石器时代过渡间的历史文化提供大量有价值的第一手实物资料。李家沟遗址石器加工技术可能受非本地技术因素的影响,但遗址所见早期居民所用优质燧石很有可能为本地所有,不大可能为"远距离采集运输所得"。李家沟遗址新石器时代遗存中大型食草类动物数量"锐减",似乎与以大型食草类动物骨骼制作成骨器有关,与生计方式变化似乎无必然关联。从李家沟遗址新石器时代到裴李岗文化,陶器制作技术似乎并没有继续向前发展,甚至出现一定的倒退,继承性远没有"变异"性明显。李家沟遗址早期新石器文化遗存中发现的石磨盘很有可能即为"研磨采集品的工具",其与裴李岗遗址发现的石磨盘、石磨棒的功能显然是有区别的。仅仅根据目前所掌握的材料,就将李家沟遗址确定为联结两个时代的重要剖面,填补了从旧石器时代向新石器时代过渡的缺环与空白,甚至与中国原始农业的起源相联系,结论为时过早。
[Abstract]:The Lijiagou site in Xinmi is a continuous accumulation of prehistoric culture from 10, 500 to 8, 600 years ago.It provides a great deal of valuable firsthand material for the academic circles to study the history and culture of the transition from Paleolithic to Neolithic in the Central Plains.Stone processing technology of Lijiagou site may be affected by non-local technical factors, but the high quality flint used by early residents at the site is likely to be locally owned and unlikely to be derived from "long-distance collection and transportation".The "sharp decline" in the number of large herbivorous animals in the Neolithic period at Lijiagou site seems to have something to do with making bones from large herbivorous animals, and does not seem to necessarily have anything to do with changes in the way of livelihood.From the Neolithic Age of Lijiagou site to Peiligang culture, the pottery making technology did not seem to continue to develop, or even a certain retrogression, the inheritance is far from "variation" obvious.The stone grinding disk found in the early Neolithic cultural remains of Lijiagou site is likely to be a "tool for grinding collection", and its function is obviously different from that of the stone grinding rod found at Peiligang site.Based only on the materials currently available, the Lijiagou site was identified as an important section linking the two eras, filling the gaps and gaps in the transition from the Paleolithic to the Neolithic, and even the origin of primitive agriculture in China.It is premature to conclude.
【作者单位】：华中师范大学马克思主义学院;苏州大学社会学院;
【分类号】：K878

【相似文献】