能力视角下的生计资本分析框架拓展

发布时间：2018-05-31 14:36

本文选题：可行能力 + 生计资本　；参考：《兰州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：纵观中国的反贫困历程,其扶贫事业大多是在政府主导在先、贫困人口参与在后的自上而下的扶贫模式下进行的,这在实践过程中已取得了显著的成效。但随着贫困认定标准的提高,一些贫困地区,尤其是西部贫困地区的减贫速度落后于增长速度、脱贫人口再度返贫等问题仍然存在,加之贫困人口还受到民族文化、习俗、传统等因素的深刻影响,相同的扶贫措施带来的减贫效果可能存在较大差异。随着中国的反贫困政策导向由“普遍撒网"向“区域化”、“集中连片贫困区”方向的转变,贫困问题的区域“异质性”特性尤其突出。本文在探讨、评价传统的生计资本分析框架特别是SL框架的基础上,通过“脆弱性”讨论和可行能力理论的引入,对“区域属性”做了更深入的理解和分析。进而提出了一套基于能力理论的可持续生计资本分析框架,建立了生计资本评价指标体系,并用拓展后的生计资本分析框架对太子山自然保护区农户贫困现状及替代生计实施效果进行了实证分析、评价,最后得出了以下基本结论：第一,改进后的可持续生计分析框架,由于在评价体系中增加了可行能力成长条件的评价指标,得出评价结论较之改进前更为全面,也更具可塑性；第二,评价结果显示,太子山自然保护区通过GEF项目的实施,五项指标得分均有了较大的增长；第三,在上述基础上,针对太子山自然保护区特殊资源约束条件和产业发展现状提出的替代生计创新项目,有助于在拓展区域主体的可行能力的同时,提高区域可持续生计资本的积累。
[Abstract]:Throughout the history of anti-poverty in China, most of its poverty alleviation undertakings are led by the government, and the poor people participate in the top-down poverty alleviation model, which has achieved remarkable results in the process of practice. However, with the improvement of the standards for the determination of poverty, the poverty reduction rate in some poor areas, especially in the western poor areas, is lagging behind the growth rate, and there are still problems such as the return of the poverty-stricken population to poverty. In addition, the poor population is also suffering from national culture and customs. Traditional factors and other factors, the same poverty reduction measures may bring about greater differences in poverty reduction. With the change of anti-poverty policy direction from "universal network" to "regionalization" and "concentrated poverty zone", the regional "heterogeneity" of poverty problem is particularly prominent. Based on the discussion and evaluation of the traditional livelihood capital analysis framework, especially the SL framework, this paper makes a deeper understanding and analysis of the "regional attribute" through the discussion of "vulnerability" and the introduction of the theory of feasible ability. Then a set of sustainable livelihood capital analysis framework based on capacity theory is put forward, and the evaluation index system of livelihood capital is established. With the extended livelihood capital analysis framework, the poverty situation of farmers and the effect of alternative livelihood implementation in Taizishan Nature Reserve are empirically analyzed and evaluated. Finally, the following basic conclusions are drawn: first, The improved analysis framework for sustainable livelihoods, as a result of the inclusion in the evaluation system of evaluation indicators of the conditions for viable capacity growth, leads to evaluation conclusions that are more comprehensive and more flexible than before the improvements; second, the evaluation results show that, Through the implementation of the GEF project, the five index scores of the Prince Zishan Nature Reserve have increased greatly. Third, on the basis of the above, According to the constraints of special resources and the present situation of industrial development in Taizishan Nature Reserve, the innovation project of alternative livelihood can help to improve the accumulation of regional sustainable livelihood capital while expanding the feasible ability of regional main body.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F323.8

【引证文献】