北京市集体建设用地利用状况分析

发布时间：2019-03-09 10:08

【摘要】：中央政府提出促进集体建设用地合理流转,实现集体建设用地与国有建设用地"同地" "同价""同权",各地陆续开展集体建设用地直接入市试点工作已积累不少经验。如何将集体建设用地管理纳入已有的城镇建设用地管理体系,实现"国有"与"集体"二元结构并轨不仅是试点工作的重点,也是学术探讨的热点和本文的选题依据。本文首先阐述了研究集体建设用地流转的必要性及现实意义,并通过文献综述总结目前该研究主题涉及的主要内容并据此提出自己的命题。同时,文章也对研究中可能运用到的相关概念和理论基础进行简要介绍。在此基础上,文章实证部分重点介绍了北京市集体建设用地利用现状,主要内容包括从利用及结构、数量、效益四个方面分析体建设用地总体与分区县的利用情况,并结合大兴区与昌平区案例对北京市集体建设用地进行具体效益评价。最后,提出了目前北京市集体建设用地在利用过程中存在的问题及制度改革的总体思路、原则及相关的政策建议。研究结论1:北京市集体建设用地总体上呈现"小、散、碎"分布,从市中心向外逐渐增加,并在六环以外迅猛增加。各区县总量规模极不均衡,发展晚的区县开发潜力规模大,有些区县已无土地开发。城市功能拓展区经营性用地比例高于其他类型用地,城市发展新区工矿仓储用地比例高与商服用地。生态涵养发展区商服用地与工矿仓储用地之和低于全市平均水平的。各种用途的规模分布呈现从中心城区向外围逐渐降低趋势,其中商服用地的比例在下降,工矿仓储用地的比例在中心城区外围最高,向郊县减少的趋势。研究结论2:北京市集体建设用地在利用过程中存在大量违规现象、开发效率低下和收益分配混乱不均等问题。鉴于此,本文基于现有法律框架、按照同地同权的思想,提出在解决历史遗留问题基础上加快确权颁证、探索多元化流转方式、构建利益共享机制等建议。
[Abstract]:The central government proposed to promote the rational transfer of collective construction land, to realize the "same place", "same price", "same right" of collective construction land and state-owned construction land. Many experiences have been accumulated in the pilot work of collective construction land directly entering the market one after another. How to integrate the management of collective construction land into the existing management system of urban construction land and realize the combination of "state-owned" and "collective" dual structure is not only the focus of the pilot work, but also the hot spot of academic discussion and the basis of this paper. Firstly, this paper expounds the necessity and practical significance of studying the circulation of collective construction land, and summarizes the main contents involved in the current research subject through literature review, and puts forward its own proposition accordingly. At the same time, the paper also gives a brief introduction to the relevant concepts and theoretical basis which may be used in the study. On this basis, the paper mainly introduces the current situation of the collective construction land use in Beijing, including the utilization and structure, quantity and benefit of the total construction land and the utilization of the sub-district and county, the main contents are analyzed from four aspects: the utilization and the structure, the quantity and the benefit. Combined with the case of Daxing District and Changping District, this paper evaluates the concrete benefit of collective construction land in Beijing. Finally, the problems existing in the utilization of the collective construction land in Beijing and the general ideas, principles and relevant policy suggestions of the system reform are put forward. Conclusions 1: the distribution of collective construction land in Beijing is "small, scattered and broken", increasing gradually from the center of the city to the outside, and increasing rapidly outside the sixth Ring Road. The total quantity of each district and county is very uneven, the development potential of late district and county is large, and some districts and counties have no land development. The proportion of operational land in urban functional expansion area is higher than that of other types of land, and the proportion of industrial and mining storage land and commercial and service land in urban development new area is high. The sum of commercial service land and industrial and mining storage land in ecological conservation development area is lower than the average level of the whole city. The scale distribution of various uses shows a decreasing trend from the central city to the periphery, in which the proportion of commercial and service land is decreasing, the proportion of industrial and mining storage land is the highest in the periphery of the central city, and it is decreasing to the suburban county. Conclusion 2: there are a large number of violations in the use of collective construction land in Beijing, the development efficiency is low and the income distribution is not equal. In view of this, based on the existing legal framework, according to the idea of the same place and the same power, this paper puts forward some suggestions, such as speeding up the confirmation of rights on the basis of solving the problems left over by history, exploring the ways of pluralistic transfer, and constructing the mechanism of benefit sharing.
【学位授予单位】：南京农业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F301.2

【相似文献】