中国绿色发展效率的评价与区域差异

发布时间：2018-05-24 12:18

本文选题：绿色发展效率 + 节能减排　；参考：《经济地理》2017年03期

【摘要】：运用基于跨期生产前沿的SBM-DEA模型测算了中国省际1999—2012年的绿色发展效率,对中国绿色发展效率的演变特征与区域差异进行了考察,并对其收敛性进行了检验。研究发现,中国省际绿色发展效率水平不高,总体呈“先降后升”的演变趋势,且节能减排无效率是绿色发展无效率的主要来源;东部在样本初期没有显著拉大与中西部的绿色发展效率差距,而始于1999年实施的区域协调发展战略和2006年以后严格推行的节能减排政策在高新技术产业向东部集聚和高耗能高污染产业大量内迁的双重影响下,却引致东部与中西部的绿色发展效率呈现出严重的两极分化格局;中国省际绿色发展效率不存在显著σ收敛和绝对β收敛,但存在显著条件β收敛,而东中西三大区域呈现出典型的“俱乐部收敛”特征,说明由于三大区域之间的绿色发展效率差异在不断增大,导致中国省际绿色发展效率差距在逐步扩大,并没有朝完全相同的稳态水平收敛趋同,然而各个区域内的绿色发展效率差距在逐步缩小,并以不同的收敛速度向各自不同的稳态水平趋近。
[Abstract]:Based on the SBM-DEA model of intertemporal production frontier, the green development efficiency between 1999 and 2012 in China is calculated. The evolution characteristics and regional differences of green development efficiency in China are investigated, and the convergence of green development efficiency is tested. It is found that the level of green development efficiency is not high among provinces in China, and the main source of green development inefficiency is energy saving and emission reduction. At the beginning of the sample period, the eastern region did not significantly widen the gap between the green development efficiency of the eastern region and the central and western regions, However, the regional coordinated development strategy that began in 1999 and the energy saving and emission reduction policy that has been strictly implemented since 2006 have a dual impact on the agglomeration of high and new technology industries to the east and the massive inward migration of high-energy and high-pollution industries. However, the green development efficiency in the east and the central and western regions shows a serious polarization pattern, and there is no significant 蟽 convergence and absolute 尾 convergence in the green development efficiency among provinces in China, but there are significant conditional 尾 convergence. The three regions of East and West show typical characteristics of "club convergence", which indicates that the difference of green development efficiency between the three regions is increasing, which leads to the widening of the gap of green development efficiency among provinces in China. However the gap of green development efficiency in different regions is gradually narrowing and converging to different steady-state levels at different convergence rates.
【作者单位】：韶关学院经济管理学院;厦门大学建筑与土木工程学院;
【分类号】：F127

【相似文献】