市场化进程、国企薪酬管制与高管薪酬业绩敏感度
[Abstract]:As an important mechanism of corporate governance, executive compensation has been highly concerned by academia and government departments. Since the outbreak of the subprime mortgage crisis in 2008, high executive pay has attracted widespread concern. The phenomenon of corporate performance decline and executive pay rise instead of falling has been severely criticized by the society, which directly led to the introduction of various versions of the "pay restraint order." However, can government pay control effectively improve the performance sensitivity of executive compensation? Should the government regulate the pay of executives in state-owned enterprises or let the market determine the pay? From the perspective of market-oriented process, this paper studies the influence of government compensation regulation on the performance sensitivity of senior executives in state-owned enterprises. In order to improve the incentive effect of executive compensation in state-owned enterprises and improve the incentive system of executive compensation in state-owned enterprises, this paper provides a theoretical reference and empirical basis. In this paper, the relationship between executive compensation and corporate performance of state-owned listed companies under the background of salary regulation is studied by combining theoretical analysis with empirical research. The full text is divided into five chapters. The first chapter is the introduction. Firstly, the research background and significance, research content and research methods are described, and the innovation and research framework of this paper are put forward. The second chapter reviews the related literature. The third chapter uses principal-agent theory, optimal contract theory and management power theory to analyze the sensitivity of executive compensation performance. The research hypothesis is put forward through theoretical analysis, and the research model is designed according to the hypothesis. The fourth chapter is the empirical test, first of all, the executive pay performance sensitivity and compensation regulation of the various proxy indicators for descriptive statistical analysis. Then the regression method is used to test the relationship between the marketization process and compensation regulation and executive compensation performance sensitivity. The fifth chapter summarizes the main conclusions of this paper and puts forward the countermeasures and suggestions according to the empirical research results as well as the shortcomings of this paper and prospects for future research. This paper finds that: (1) compensation control will distort the sensitivity of executive pay performance, (2) the process of marketization will improve the distorting effect of compensation regulation on the sensitivity of executive pay performance; (3) the effect of compensation regulation on the sensitivity of executive compensation performance in central enterprises is more than that on local state-owned enterprises; (4) the establishment of professional committees makes the corporate governance mechanism perfect day by day. Based on the results of the study, this paper puts forward the following policy recommendations to improve the executive compensation incentive system of state-owned enterprises: (1) to continue to promote market-oriented reform, to create a fair competitive environment, (2) to implement differentiated compensation control; (3) establishing the performance appraisal system that the executive compensation is linked to the company's performance; (4) continuing to promote the establishment of the professional committee in order to perfect the internal control system of the company.
【学位授予单位】:江西师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:F272.92;F276.1
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 ;冷静看待高管薪酬[J];新理财;2006年06期
2 马红漫;;国企高管薪酬困局何时能解开[J];国际商务财会;2009年03期
3 ;动荡中的高管薪酬[J];首席财务官;2009年05期
4 李维安;黄郑州;王彩星;;构筑科学的高管薪酬决定机制[J];资本市场;2009年08期
5 万希;;高管薪酬设计的困惑[J];中外企业文化;2009年06期
6 江南草;;“高管薪酬将下降”还得边走边看[J];经济研究参考;2009年36期
7 裘益政;高书胜;;企业制衡权与高管薪酬的实证研究[J];财会通讯;2009年33期
8 陈胜蓝;;高管薪酬与公司定价——来自股权分置改革前后新股发行的经验证据[J];财会通讯;2009年36期
9 丁冬冬;袁兴;王亮;双希;;产权、股东制衡与高管薪酬[J];现代商业;2010年15期
10 董梅生;洪功翔;;上市公司高管薪酬与普通职工收入及其差距的实证分析[J];华东经济管理;2010年09期
相关会议论文 前10条
1 谢佼遂;;盈余管理与高管薪酬的关系:文献回顾及未来研究趋势[A];经济生活——2012商会经济研讨会论文集(下)[C];2012年
2 井润田;;行业层面的管理决断权度量及其对高管薪酬的影响[A];系统工程与和谐管理——第十届全国青年系统科学与管理科学学术会议论文集[C];2009年
3 赵纯祥;;国企高管薪酬管制的经济学分析[A];中国会计学会高等工科院校分会2010年学术年会论文集[C];2010年
4 李艳辉;陈震;;市场化进程与高管薪酬——业绩敏感性[A];中国会计学会财务成本分会2011年年会暨第二十四次理论研讨会论文集[C];2011年
5 王清刚;胡亚君;;管理层权力与异常高管薪酬行为研究[A];中国会计学会2011学术年会论文集[C];2011年
6 罗宏;张玮倩;;媒体报道对高管薪酬的管制作用研究[A];中国会计学会2011学术年会论文集[C];2011年
7 孙俊奇;贵永m,
本文编号:2383408
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/xmjj/2383408.html