电子票据立法问题研究
发布时间：2019-01-26 19:58
【摘要】：商务与金融的电子化趋势,使得作为支付工具之一的传统票据面临着全新的挑战,也为票据的发展带来了新的机遇。传统票据随之开启了电子化进程,并以电子票据为其终极发展目标。甚至有人预言电子票据会最终取代传统票据,成为未来最佳支付工具之一。然而,由于电子票据的特殊存在方式,其法律地位并未得到立法的明确承认,在运行规则、当事人权利义务等方面又与传统票据法理论存在着诸多矛盾与冲突,亟待相应的理论研究与立法规制加以解决。 本文分四部分对电子票据的立法保护问题进行论述： 第一部分对电子票据基础理论进行研究。首先,从内涵与外延两方面,对电子票据做出明确的界定。其次,分析电子票据与传统票据法理论的冲突,并探索电子票据对传统票据功能的新发展。 第二部分运用归纳与比较的分析方法,从联合国、美国、日本及我国台湾地区关于电子票据的立法入手,考察并分析境外电子票据立法例,总结其先进的立法技术与法律制度,以备我国立法时参考借鉴之用。 第三部分从电子票据立法的合法性、必要性与可行性角度,阐述我国对电子票据进行立法保护的正当性问题。并为第四部分我国电子票据法律制度的构建提供充足的正当性基础。 第四部分则是全文的研究重点所在。该部分中,确定适合我国的电子票据的立法模式。并且,在安全性、可操作性及兼容性的立法原则指导下,从微观上对我国电子票据法律制度进行具体的设计。
[Abstract]:The electronic trend of commerce and finance makes the traditional bill as one of the payment tools face new challenges and brings new opportunities for the development of the bill. The traditional bill opens the electronic process, and takes the electronic bill as its ultimate development goal. Some even predict that electronic bills will eventually replace traditional bills as one of the best payment instruments in the future. However, due to the special existence of electronic instruments, their legal status has not been explicitly recognized by legislation, and there are many contradictions and conflicts with the traditional negotiable instrument law theory in the aspects of operation rules, parties' rights and obligations, etc. It is urgent to solve the problem of relevant theoretical research and legislative regulation. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the legislative protection of electronic instruments: the first part studies the basic theory of electronic bills. First of all, from the connotation and extension of two aspects, to make a clear definition of electronic bills. Secondly, it analyzes the conflict between electronic bill and traditional negotiable instrument law, and explores the new development of electronic bill's function to traditional instrument. The second part uses the analysis method of induction and comparison, starting with the legislation of the United Nations, the United States, Japan and Taiwan about electronic bill, investigates and analyzes the overseas electronic bill legislation example, summarizes its advanced legislation technology and legal system. For our country to legislate for reference. The third part expounds the legitimacy of legislation on electronic instruments from the angle of legality, necessity and feasibility. And for the fourth part of the legal system of electronic bills to provide adequate legal basis. The fourth part is the research focus of the full text. In this part, the legislative model of electronic bill suitable for our country is determined. Furthermore, under the guidance of the legislative principles of security, operability and compatibility, the legal system of electronic bills in China is designed microscopically.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.287
[Abstract]:The electronic trend of commerce and finance makes the traditional bill as one of the payment tools face new challenges and brings new opportunities for the development of the bill. The traditional bill opens the electronic process, and takes the electronic bill as its ultimate development goal. Some even predict that electronic bills will eventually replace traditional bills as one of the best payment instruments in the future. However, due to the special existence of electronic instruments, their legal status has not been explicitly recognized by legislation, and there are many contradictions and conflicts with the traditional negotiable instrument law theory in the aspects of operation rules, parties' rights and obligations, etc. It is urgent to solve the problem of relevant theoretical research and legislative regulation. This paper is divided into four parts to discuss the legislative protection of electronic instruments: the first part studies the basic theory of electronic bills. First of all, from the connotation and extension of two aspects, to make a clear definition of electronic bills. Secondly, it analyzes the conflict between electronic bill and traditional negotiable instrument law, and explores the new development of electronic bill's function to traditional instrument. The second part uses the analysis method of induction and comparison, starting with the legislation of the United Nations, the United States, Japan and Taiwan about electronic bill, investigates and analyzes the overseas electronic bill legislation example, summarizes its advanced legislation technology and legal system. For our country to legislate for reference. The third part expounds the legitimacy of legislation on electronic instruments from the angle of legality, necessity and feasibility. And for the fourth part of the legal system of electronic bills to provide adequate legal basis. The fourth part is the research focus of the full text. In this part, the legislative model of electronic bill suitable for our country is determined. Furthermore, under the guidance of the legislative principles of security, operability and compatibility, the legal system of electronic bills in China is designed microscopically.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D922.287
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王姝;;电子票据法律制度研究[J];鞍山科技大学学报;2006年01期
2 李良 ,陈晓红;电子支票的法律问题探讨[J];银行家;2004年08期
3 吕苏榆;尚静;;票据伪造下的银行付款困境[J];金融论坛;2007年09期
4 董翠香;论我国票据法中票据付款人的审查义务[J];当代法学;2002年08期
5 汪世虎;票据签章问题研究[J];当代法学;2002年12期
6 弋t，
本文编号：2415855
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/jingjilunwen/zbyz/2415855.html
