东盟方式的运作困境

发布时间：2018-04-18 23:02

本文选题：东盟方式 + 运作困境　；参考：《厦门大学》2014年硕士论文

【摘要】：冷战后,经济危机、跨国移民等地区性问题开始质疑“东盟方式”的合理性和有效性,要求修改不干涉内政原则,强化东盟机制建设,形成一套有效的跨国管理模式,更好地发挥其地区管理者的作用。那么,东盟会调整“东盟方式”以适应不断变化的国际和地区环境变化的需要吗? 本文试图从东盟有意识的加强自身组织建设过程中探寻“东盟方式”的困境。冷战后,东盟组织经历了一系列重大调整。在组织结构方面,完善决策机制满足政治经济发展需要,吸收印支三国和缅甸实现大东盟梦想。在组织目标方面,借鉴欧洲共同体发展经验,成立自由贸易区,加紧东盟共同体建设。然而,扩大后的东盟成员国对国家主权的依然高度敏感,国家利益优先于地区利益。东盟共同体建设并没有深化成员国之间的政治经济联系,推进东盟制度化建设,其目的是共同协商处理地区问题。因此,东盟组织的完善并没改变东盟松散联盟的性质,决定了“东盟方式”存在的必要。然而,不容忽视的是：《东盟宪章》赋予了东盟法律人格,保障了东盟实体地位,确立了《东盟宪章》至高无上的地位以及普遍约束力。首脑会议的机制化以及东盟秘书处行政权力的扩大强化了东盟的机制化建设,突破了东盟对非正式安排的偏好,“加强互动”概念的出台和应用软化了不干涉内政原则。他们或多或少都修正了传统的“东盟方式”,而东盟互动的持续加强必然导致“东盟方式”不断变化。
[Abstract]:After the Cold War, the economic crisis, transnational migration and other regional issues began to question the rationality and effectiveness of the "ASEAN approach," and called for the revision of the principle of non-interference in internal affairs, the strengthening of the ASEAN mechanism, and the formation of an effective transnational management model.To play a better role as a regional manager.Will ASEAN adjust its approach to the changing international and regional environment?This paper tries to explore the predicament of ASEAN way from the process of consciously strengthening its own organization construction.After the cold war, ASEAN organization experienced a series of major adjustments.In terms of organizational structure, perfect the decision-making mechanism to meet the needs of political and economic development, absorb the Indochina three countries and Myanmar to realize the dream of Greater ASEAN.In terms of organizational objectives, draw lessons from the development experience of the European Community, set up a Free Trade area, and step up the construction of ASEAN Community.However, the expanded ASEAN members remain highly sensitive to national sovereignty and national interests take precedence over regional interests.The construction of ASEAN Community does not deepen the political and economic ties among member countries and promote the institutionalization of ASEAN. Its purpose is to deal with regional problems through joint negotiation.Therefore, the perfection of ASEAN does not change the nature of ASEAN loose alliance, which determines the necessity of ASEAN mode.However, it can not be ignored that the ASEAN Charter endows ASEAN with legal personality, guarantees ASEAN entity status, and establishes the supreme status and universal binding force of ASEAN Charter.The institutionalization of the summit and the expansion of the administrative power of the ASEAN Secretariat strengthen the institutional construction of ASEAN, break through ASEAN's preference for informal arrangements, and soften the principle of non-interference in internal affairs with the introduction and application of the concept of "enhanced interaction".They have more or less revised the traditional ASEAN mode, and the continuous strengthening of ASEAN interaction will inevitably lead to the constant change of ASEAN mode.
【学位授予单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D814.1

【参考文献】