全要素生产率视角下我国区域中心城市经济增长方式研究

发布时间：2018-06-05 03:19

本文选题：区域中心城市 + 全要素生产率　；参考：《河南大学》2013年硕士论文

【摘要】：区域中心城市作为区域经济发展的增长极、国家经济的重要支撑点和参与世界经济竞争的结节点，经济获得了快速发展，各项建设成果显著。区域中心城市经济增长方式的转变，关系到整个区域乃至整个国家的经济发展的状况，在区域和国家加快转变经济增长方式的过程中起着举足轻重的作用。近年来，区域中心城市在发展的同时付出了巨大的环境和资源代价，经济发展与资源环境矛盾日趋尖锐。本文针对区域中心城市全要素生产率展开研究，通过分析中心城市经济增长动力以及影响因素，为进一步推进中心城市的持续、有效、健康发展提供参考。本文首先基于DEA-Malmquist指数方法，运用面板数据，研究了2000-2010年间我国35个区域中心城市全要素生产率的变动状况，并将其分解为技术进步和技术效率，研究发现这11年期间，我国35个区域中心城市全要素生产率的平均增长率为3.3%。全要素生产率改善同时来自技术效率和技术进步的贡献，其中技术进步的贡献较大，具有2.7%的增长率；技术效率的增长率仅为0.5%，对技术效率进一步分解，其规模效率的增长率为1.2%，纯技术效率略有下降。这表明我国35个区域中心城市全要素生产率主要是基于技术变化的改善，这也印证了我国改革开放和推行市场经济体制之后大力进行技术革新和技术引进的效果。其次，，本文按照我国东、中、西三大经济地带的划分对不同区域中心城市全要素生产率的进行差异分析。我国35个区域中心城市按照东、中、西三大地区划分的全要素生产率指数均大于1，即这三大地区的中心城市的全要素生产率均值都是改善的，且西部地区全要素生产率改善的最高为5.3%，东部地区全要素生产率改善了2.3%，中部地区全要素生产率改善的最低为1.6%。这三大区域全要素生产率的改善的主要来源均是技术变化的提升，且西部地区技术变化改善的程度最高，东部次之，中部最低，三大地区中心城市技术效率改善的程度则不高，东部地区的技术效率甚至出现了下降。再次，从区域中心城市全要素生产率对经济增长的贡献来看，作者发现石家庄市、呼和浩特市、西宁市、上海市、乌鲁木齐市、长春市、天津市这7个城市全要素生产率增长对经济增长的贡献都达到百分之五十以上，这表明这7个城市更多的是依靠全要素生产率对经济增长的贡献，经济是集约增长型。其余28个中心城市全要素生产率对经济增长的贡献则在百分之五十以下，这也表明了这28个城市的经济增长更多是依靠要素投入，而全要素生产率的增长对经济增长的贡献率较低，这些城市仍处于传统粗放型的经济增长方式。最后，本文进一步研究了人力资本、利益分配格局、政府行为、城市化水平、产业结构等因素对区域中心城市全要素生产率的影响，并提出了相关的政策性建议。研究表明，人力资本是影响我国中心城市TFP增长的重要因子，虽然由于本文选择了不恰当的替代变量，从而造成人力资本的不显著，但是人力资本的提升对全要素生产率的促进作用毋庸置疑；城市化水平和政府支出对我国区域中心城市TFP的增长具有显著的推动作用；利益分配格局的替代变量政府收入则对我国中心城市的TFP的增长为显著的负效应，政府在利益分配中份额有所下降，企业和个人有了提高产出效率的内在冲动，从而使经济增长建立在一个合乎人类理性的基础之上；产业结构的演进即第三产业的发展对中心城市的TFP的增长也具有积极效应。
[Abstract]:As the growth pole of regional economic development , the important supporting point of the national economy and the nodule point participating in the world economic competition , the regional center city has achieved rapid development , and the construction results are remarkable . In recent years , the urban economic growth pattern of the regional center plays an important role in the process of accelerating the transformation of the economic growth mode . In recent years , the regional central city has paid great environmental and resource costs , economic development and resource environment contradiction become more acute . In recent years , the paper studies the whole factor productivity of the regional center city , and provides a reference for further advancing the sustainable , effective and healthy development of the central city .

Based on DEA - Malmquist index method and panel data , this paper studied the changes of urban total factor productivity in 35 regional centers in China from 2000 to 2010 , and decomposed them into technological progress and technical efficiency .
The growth rate of the technical efficiency is only 0.5 % , the technical efficiency is further decomposed , the growth rate of the scale efficiency is 1.2 % , and the pure technical efficiency decreases slightly . This shows that the total factor productivity of the 35 regional centers in China is mainly based on the improvement of technological change , which also confirms the effect of technological innovation and technology introduction after China ' s reform and opening up and the introduction of the market economy system .

Secondly , according to the division of the three major economic zones in the east , middle and west of our country , the whole factor productivity index of the central cities in China is more than 1 , that is , the whole factor productivity index of the central cities in the three regions is improved , and the whole factor productivity in the western region is improved by 2.3 % , and the whole factor productivity in the central region is improved by 2.3 % . The improvement of the whole factor productivity in the western region is the highest , the improvement of the technical efficiency of the central city in the central region is not high , and the technical efficiency in the east region has even decreased .

Again , from the contribution of the whole factor productivity to economic growth from the whole factor productivity of the regional center city , the author finds that the contribution of the whole factor productivity growth to the economic growth of Shijiazhuang City , Huhehaote City , Xiining City , Shanghai , Urumqi , Changchun and Tianjin is more than 50 percent , which shows that the economic growth of the 28 cities is more dependent on the factor input , and the contribution rate of the whole factor productivity to the economic growth is low , and the cities are still in the traditional rough economic growth mode .

Finally , this paper further studies the influence of human capital , interests distribution pattern , government behavior , urbanization level , industrial structure and other factors on the whole factor productivity of regional center cities , and puts forward some relevant policy suggestions .
The urbanization level and government expenditure have a significant impetus to the growth of the urban TFPs in China ' s regional center ;
The government ' s income of the substitution variable of the distribution pattern of interest is negative effect on the growth of TFPs in the central city of our country , and the share of the government in the distribution of interest is decreased , the enterprises and individuals have the inner impulse to improve the output efficiency , thus the economic growth is built on the basis of human rationality ;
The evolution of the industrial structure , that is , the development of the tertiary industry , has positive effects on the growth of the central city .
【学位授予单位】：河南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：F127

【参考文献】